Results 1 to 15 of 38

Thread: Hw77 or hw57 ??

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    sunderland
    Posts
    866

    Hw77 or hw57 ??

    Fancy a new rifle.looking at hw77 and hw57 you lads know more than me so in your experiance which do you prefer ?,others i considered were tx200 and hw80 but both heavy.maybe hw77 and 57 are heavy ??,dunno what do yas think ?.rifles will be used for shooting vermin upto 50 yards.

  2. #2
    tinbum's Avatar
    tinbum is online now Killer Vampire Lesbians on scooters
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Daarn Saaarf!
    Posts
    19,520
    The 57 is an underlever format based around the Hw99, as such it's much lighter than the others mentioned. I would shoulder them and see how you feel.
    My ignore list: ​<Hidden information>

  3. #3
    Blackrider's Avatar
    Blackrider is offline It don't mean a thing, if it ain't got a Spring
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Perthshire the Heart of Scotland !
    Posts
    9,364
    All depends upon what you want to use it for Rob ?
    Sounds as if the HW 77k would fit your bill nicely and I'd go for .22 cal. !
    “An airgun or two”………

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Eastbourne
    Posts
    2,130
    I have a TX200 and I am thinking about purchasing an HW77 to use with open sights. One thing I would say about the TX is although heavy, the weight "intentionally" helps balance the recoil resulting in an amazingly accurate springer!!! Perfect for vermin

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Buckley, Flintshire.
    Posts
    1,075
    I've never owned a HW77, but I have owned a HW97k....it was heavy, on a par with the TX200 weight-wise. I've also owned a HW57, these are NOT heavy! Being honest the 97k is the better gun, but not as good as a TX (now I've done it!), but if I was going to buy a '57 or '77 it would be the '57. Much easier to haul about.
    HuMa regulated S200 .22...
    Artemis PP800 .177...
    Weihrauch HW45 .177

  6. #6
    Murphy is offline Cooee! Chase me you naughty boys!
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Wigan
    Posts
    22,392
    The 57 is not even half the rifle the other 3 are.
    Master Debater

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    sunderland
    Posts
    866
    Haha mixed bag of opinions here ha,ive had a hw97k loved it but i got tennis elbow and arthritis in my shoulder so i sold it.tx200 is a gun i always wanted but ill struggle lug that about all afternoon.what about hw80 is that same weight as tx 200 and hw97k ??.

  8. #8
    Gareth W-B's Avatar
    Gareth W-B is offline Retired Mod & Airgun Anorak Extraordinaire
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Near(ish) Chelmsford
    Posts
    26,446
    Quote Originally Posted by robhw97k View Post

    Fancy a new rifle.looking at hw77 and hw57 you lads know more than me so in your experiance which do you prefer ?,others i considered were tx200 and hw80 but both heavy.maybe hw77 and 57 are heavy ??,dunno what do yas think ?.rifles will be used for shooting vermin upto 50 yards.
    Not read all the replies to this thread as yet, as am wading straight in, so apologies if what I am about to say has already been said, but imho, for shooting the distance you require (50 yards) under no circumstances give the HW57 any more consideration as it is so significantly inferior to the HW77 (or HW97 if you want to go for a scoped HW) in this regard, that I can't even think where to begin (field tested an HW57 in .177 and an HW57 in .22 by putting several tins of premium pellets through each a decade or so ago, and afterwards, I vowed I'd never waste a single second of my shooting time firing one in preference to either of the aforementioned ever again).

    Hope this rant sort of helps (?), and sorry if my opinion offends anyone, but if it does, tough (lol), as it is just that, my opinion, calculated, and based on my own real-time personal experience, and I will not enter into a debate on the subject. Would just like to close by saying however, that 'cosmetics' can count when buying an air rifle, too, and (again imho), so when choosing, don't forget that the HW57 is also pig ugly.

    .
    Last edited by Gareth W-B; 14-10-2017 at 12:05 PM. Reason: to ad the bit about it being ugly :-D
    _______________________________________________

    Done my bit for the BBS: http://www.airgunbbs.com/showthread....-being-a-mod-… now I’m a game-keeper turned poacher.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    worthing
    Posts
    3,333
    Nice one Gareth, that should stir things up a treat...

  10. #10
    Gareth W-B's Avatar
    Gareth W-B is offline Retired Mod & Airgun Anorak Extraordinaire
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Near(ish) Chelmsford
    Posts
    26,446
    Quote Originally Posted by rabbitwrecker View Post

    Nice one Gareth, that should stir things up a treat...
    Cheers. Am always 'AIMING' to please (did ya see what I did there?)
    _______________________________________________

    Done my bit for the BBS: http://www.airgunbbs.com/showthread....-being-a-mod-… now I’m a game-keeper turned poacher.

  11. #11
    Murphy is offline Cooee! Chase me you naughty boys!
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Wigan
    Posts
    22,392
    Pro Sport is probably the ultimate hunting rifle.

    Nice balance and very quiet.
    Master Debater

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Bromsgrove
    Posts
    870
    Quote Originally Posted by Murphy View Post
    Pro Sport is probably the ultimate hunting rifle.

    Nice balance and very quiet.
    compeletely agreeing with that ....i have one ....
    but he was on about mid priced HWs.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •