Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 18 of 18

Thread: Clockwise verses Anti-clockwise.

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    4,842
    Quote Originally Posted by grumpygit View Post
    The old BSA Standards used to use two springs wound in opposite directions presumably to counter this when bell target shooting. Please correct me if i'm wrong.
    To stop them running up inside each other, as I often see when a spring breaks the one part winds into the other as they are the same "thread".

    Baz
    BE AN INDEPENDENT THINKER, DON'T FOLLOW THE CROWD

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Retford, Notts
    Posts
    34,956
    Quote Originally Posted by Loki_79 View Post
    From a physics perspective, only pistons that are free to rotate should produce any rotation of the action - otherwise you have not conserved angular momentum.
    Yep.

    I reported this very effect a few years ago and a few people concurred. The rifle I noticed it with was a Walther LGV. It was a very, very sweet shooting rifle belonging to an ex-HFT champ. High mag scope fitted. Once I had "dialled into it" after a few shots the effect, although slight, was most definitely detectable. Didn't harm the accuracy one bit, mind, and it was also very forgiving.
    THE BOINGER BASH AT QUIGLEY HOLLOW. MAKING GREAT MEMORIES SINCE 15th JUNE, 2013.
    NEXT EVENT :- May 4/5, 2024.........BOING!!

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    New Milton, Hampshire
    Posts
    14,389
    Quote Originally Posted by Loki_79 View Post
    From a physics perspective, only pistons that are free to rotate should produce any rotation of the action - otherwise you have not conserved angular momentum.
    Yep, but you'd be amazed how many think the opposite.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •