HW45, and why I hate fibre-optics

[Geezer]

I never liked the HW45 much when they came out. It just didn't do it for me, somehow. None of the "magnum" springer pistols did back then. It seemed to me you got a lot of weight and cocking effort in exchange for a 10-20% power increase over a Webley Tempest or Diana Model 5.

I started changing my mind a few years ago when I got a BSA Scorpion, and decided that, at the right price, I might have a go with a 45 some time.

I finally got around to picking up at auction as new/as-new recent production in its box HW45, apparently unused, with all the paperwork. £156, including fees, which is a nice discount on the £250-270 price.

I won't bother with a lengthy description, as the 45 is well-known and easily Googled. I would note:

- It isn't as overbearingly huge and top-heavy as I had feared; probably down to the major parts being alloy, not steel. Compared to the Scorpion, it feels quite svelte. It doesn't feel clumsier than a Diana 5 or Webley Hurricane.

- It doesn't point quite like a 1911. I know my 1911s, and they come up on target for windage, with variations in elevation depending on the type of mainspring housing and where my right thumb is placed. But the 45 comes up low and left and needs correcting.

- Cocking is surprisingly easy. Not something I'd want to fire 50 quick shots from, but easier than the Scorpion (though the latter is a bit more powerful).

- It's poky. It twangs. Should I try the dry-fire thing?

- It seems to want to shoot. But I can't on an initial acquaintance and about fifty pellets get it to group under an inch at 10M from standing. That may be lack of familiarity. But...

- I cannot get on with the fibre-optic sights at all. The sight picture is all over the place, and depending on where I stand in my little indoor range in respect to the lights, I can get everything from huge glowing dots that obscure the blade and notch to almost no glow at all (but not none).

So, verdict. Nice pistol. Will probably never be my favourite. But terribly let down by its sights.

I'm sure fibre-optics are great for a quick blat at a short-range can, but not for much else (the same conclusion I reached with the only other gun I owned with them).

[tinbum]

It's a man's gun for sure! Only kidding, it'll be fine for you too. Eventually!

Open it up and give it a thorough de grease and rebuild virtually dry, I dry fire twice on rebuild, it works for me. With a little attention mine is virtually recoiless on half power with the shoulder stock, it accounted well for itself against the bell target at the bash.

[Geezer]

Shoulder stock conversion kit. Forgot that. Balls, another thing to spend money on just to see what it's like, and probably end up in the back of one of my spare bits boxes.

[tinbum]

Shoulder stock conversion kit. Forgot that. Balls, another thing to spend money on just to see what it's like, and probably end up in the back of one of my spare bits boxes.

You can borrow mine to try if you want. Good value from ze Germans if you do decide to get one.

[TonyL]

Persevere with it, Mr Geezer.

With a little more time for familiarisation, the required hold will let itself be known to you.

As for the fibre optics, I find them much better outdoor and quite like them.

[Geezer]

I will, Tone, but I fear, after 35 years of shooting pistols with normal sights, that it will take a long time to get used to fibre-optics. A problem I never had with white dots, white lines round the rear notch, or little tritium vials.

And, yes, I need to work out how and where to index my grip for a natural point. On real 1911s, the combination of the grip safety/beaver tail and riding the manual safety with the thumb sorted it out. The HW has neither to work with.