Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 24

Thread: Springers from an engineering standpoint.

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    1,207

    Springers from an engineering standpoint.

    So I've been away from shooting now for a few years due to motorcycling, but its really peaking my interest again being winter and all, I'm really fancying a simple lightweight sporting springer with open sights (the traditional look), I'm a sucker for quality engineering so would I still be right in thinking the correct way to go would be an open sighted HW95? or have other manufacturers caught up or surpassed them? I'm liking the look of some Diana's right now but they still seem to be festooned with plastic.

  2. #2
    look no hands's Avatar
    look no hands is online now Even better looking than a HW35
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Coventry, even closer to Tony L.
    Posts
    11,979
    Just search for HW99 and then knock yourself out.

    But you didn't hear it from me right

    Pete
    Far too many rifles to list now, all mainly British but the odd pesky foreigner has snuck in

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    A few miles east of Nottingham
    Posts
    547
    Having broken the spring on my LGU yesterday, and finding my HW97 refusing to cock this afternoon (now sorted, just been over-enthusiastic in trying to reduce sear engagement for a really crisp let off) I took my HW95 out for a lovely simple single hole grouping session, and thought nothing beats a good honest simple break barrel. Plenty of good ones out there but, depending on taste, not much to beat the 95.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Radcliffe on Trent ,nottinghamshire
    Posts
    4,662
    Was thinking exact same thing , light weight break barrel like a lightening or 95 , yeah right I ended up buying a HW80 , perfect

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Bruton
    Posts
    6,591
    By engineering, do you mean design, build quality, or a combination of both?

    Factory springer design basically peaked in 1991 with the Air Arms TX200. The (?) 2009 Umarex Walther LGV/LGU are in the same bracket. The 2000-vintage Webley Tomahawk and its slightly later little brother the Longbow get an honourable mention for break-barrels, but are less sophisticated inside, and no longer made. Of course, the TXs and Webleys are scope-only in factory trim.

    HW95 is a very good choice, but a 1980s HW85 is slightly better in design/quality terms.

    HW99S is great. Except when it's not (do a search, including the word "galling").

    Don't look down on Dianas. The 34 family are quite good, and worth considering against the 95.

    To be honest, my 1950s/60s Diana 35 is better made and finished than the later Dianas, and only slightly under their power (10ish ft-lbs).

    There is a lot to be said for a 1970s-80s FWB Sport, a BSF 70, or a 1984-94 Webley Omega.

    Which is a long way of saying that a modern 95 is a dratted good gun, but some of the oldies not only match but even beat it.

  6. #6
    Barryg's Avatar
    Barryg is offline Registered ̶D̶i̶a̶n̶a̶ User
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Nr. YEOVIL
    Posts
    5,007
    Quote Originally Posted by scorpion View Post
    So I've been away from shooting now for a few years due to motorcycling, but its really peaking my interest again being winter and all, I'm really fancying a simple lightweight sporting springer with open sights (the traditional look), I'm a sucker for quality engineering so would I still be right in thinking the correct way to go would be an open sighted HW95? or have other manufacturers caught up or surpassed them? I'm liking the look of some Diana's right now but they still seem to be festooned with plastic.
    Just wondering what parts of Diana are festooned with plastic and if you are a sucker for quality engineering have you looked closely at the Diana barrel hinge and breech area compared to a 95 also have you had a close look at the new screw on barrel stop setup on the new HWs

  7. #7
    look no hands's Avatar
    look no hands is online now Even better looking than a HW35
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Coventry, even closer to Tony L.
    Posts
    11,979
    Quote Originally Posted by Barryg View Post
    Just wondering what parts of Diana are festooned with plastic and if you are a sucker for quality engineering have you looked closely at the Diana barrel hinge and breech area compared to a 95 also have you had a close look at the new screw on barrel stop setup on the new HWs
    He probably means the older 34's that had the placky trigger guard and cylinder end cap.

    Pete
    Far too many rifles to list now, all mainly British but the odd pesky foreigner has snuck in

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    Glenrothes
    Posts
    1,352
    Quote Originally Posted by look no hands View Post
    He probably means the older 34's that had the placky trigger guard and cylinder end cap.

    Pete
    The current 34's have more plastic than the early ones.

  9. #9
    look no hands's Avatar
    look no hands is online now Even better looking than a HW35
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Coventry, even closer to Tony L.
    Posts
    11,979
    Quote Originally Posted by Drew451 View Post
    The current 34's have more plastic than the early ones.
    Really! are we talking open sights as well as the above mentioned items?

    Pete
    Far too many rifles to list now, all mainly British but the odd pesky foreigner has snuck in

  10. #10
    Barryg's Avatar
    Barryg is offline Registered ̶D̶i̶a̶n̶a̶ User
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Nr. YEOVIL
    Posts
    5,007
    Quote Originally Posted by look no hands View Post
    He probably means the older 34's that had the placky trigger guard and cylinder end cap.

    Pete
    Yes but I wouldn't call that festooned just a dust cap and a quick change for metal trigger guard.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    Glenrothes
    Posts
    1,352
    Quote Originally Posted by look no hands View Post
    Really! are we talking open sights as well as the above mentioned items?

    Pete
    Yes. Rearsight on the Premium and both on other models. Rearsight and trigger guard had me fooled i must admit.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    Glenrothes
    Posts
    1,352
    Quote Originally Posted by Barryg View Post
    Yes but I wouldn't call that festooned just a dust cap and a quick change for metal trigger guard.
    Metal guards very hard to get now. Personally, the plastic ones look fine to my eyes. Even the old 66 and 75 had them. Fooled me for a long time.

  13. #13
    tinbum's Avatar
    tinbum is offline Killer Vampire Lesbians on scooters
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Daarn Saaarf!
    Posts
    19,386
    To avoid disappointment buy a 95 or 80.
    God rest ye jelly mental men

  14. #14
    Barryg's Avatar
    Barryg is offline Registered ̶D̶i̶a̶n̶a̶ User
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Nr. YEOVIL
    Posts
    5,007
    Quote Originally Posted by Drew451 View Post
    Metal guards very hard to get now. Personally, the plastic ones look fine to my eyes. Even the old 66 and 75 had them. Fooled me for a long time.
    Yes I suppose that all they do is add weight

    Anyway here is a pic of both.



  15. #15
    look no hands's Avatar
    look no hands is online now Even better looking than a HW35
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Coventry, even closer to Tony L.
    Posts
    11,979
    I personally can't see what the problem is with a placky guard and end cap, it's when it's things like the trigger that things get a bit worrying, some of the Airsporters had placky trigger blades and you could feel them bending when you pulled it.

    Pete
    Far too many rifles to list now, all mainly British but the odd pesky foreigner has snuck in

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •