Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Air rifles and diminishing returns

  1. #1
    creed Guest

    Air rifles and diminishing returns

    I dare say this has been dwelt on before but yesterday,whilst visiting my friendly neighbourhood RFD I handled some rifles and enquired of prices as you do.
    Air Arms S400 £425
    FX Streamline £730 (I think)
    Weihrauch HW100 sporter £800
    Air Arms HFT500 £900 I will add for comparison purposes.
    Admittedly,it was the AA S410 I picked up but I would guess fit is about the same for a S400 although I am happy to be corrected.
    Yes,the HW100 was a slightly better fit on the day to me but the S400/410 was so close and I do think the German rifle seemed more "solid" but not twice the price more solid.Would it be twice as accurate?
    Thankfully,my hand would not fit around a Daystate thumbhole stock to reach the trigger so at least I am spared looking at £1000+ air rifles.
    At what point do you say to yourselves "enough of this lunacy.It's just an air rifle and I will not pay more than £xxx for one"?
    So maybe in the near future I will buy an S400 classic ...but that German rifle did seem awfully nice

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    cardiff, south wales.
    Posts
    3,368
    I agree prices have rocketed over the last few years, and 10 years ago if you would have asked me, would I pay a grand for an air rifle I would have laughed in your face Sadly it seems that's where the prices are, which pushes the second hand prices up as well. Are they worth the money, probably not, but if you want a particular rifle you have to pay the price. And people must be buying them as they wouldn't make them otherwise surely ?

    John
    Law of any kind only affects those willing to abide by it.

  3. #3
    Hsing-ee's Avatar
    Hsing-ee is offline may also be employed in conjunction with a drawn reciprocation dingle arm, to reduce sinusoidal repleneration
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    18,217
    I don't know but I bought I secondhand BSA Scorpion PCP, the first model, and it will shoot 0.2" groups centre to centre in still air at 30 yards off a bench with RWS Superdomes from a tin. I think the rifle was £250 or something.

    I don't think I would notice an increase in inherent accuracy from a more expensive rifle. It might be easier to shoot, but that is all.

  4. #4
    secretagentmole Guest
    Funny thing is round here an HW100 will set you back £690!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    peterborough
    Posts
    864
    Pretty much the same with anything, clothes, food, cars, houses, electrical good, women etc.

    I make parts for my guns, each part has very little effect, the more parts I fit, the less I notice the difference, doesn’t stop me trying to make my gun better.

    AA s400 is 1/3 of the price of a an ftp900, the 900 is not 3 times more accurate, not 3 times more consistent not 3 times better but from an engineering point of view, imo it represents better value for money than the 400.

    Bb

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Clacton on Sea
    Posts
    183
    I wonder how these places survive unless you are constantly selling rifles. I am guessing most people would only buy the odd rifle possibly years apart. As mentioned last week I have just brought a Walther Classus, it has a Lothar Walther barrel a Minelli stock and cost £199 delivered. I almost feel guilty that I wasn't paying more. Admittedly I would not have brought it if it had been more expensive and I didn't need it so I can't really see the dealers being able to increase prices without loosing customers.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    East Sussex, Nr Rye
    Posts
    17,109
    I expect that for every 20% on a rifle 80% goes on all the other costs. So a £300 rifle only be £60 of rifle. £1,000 you get £200 of rifle. That extra money they can do a lot with.
    The second limitation is the pure 12ft/lbs and pushing out a small lead pellet. Consistency getting out of the barrel and consistency flying through the air. The top end rifles with complimentary ammo can deliver incredible accuracy if the marksman is any good. A great trigger makes it easier, the rest is ergonomics. However, the pellet having been fantastically released is soon influenced by outside conditions and that is for the marksman to work out. Its not far, not much more than 10m. But an average rifle won't even set the pellet off perfectly every time, so there is error from the start, which can show at 10m or so. If the pellet set out badly from the start things get worse the further out the pellet goes. Tiny error at 10m is a barn door at 30, above that of the conditions.

    Are you good enough to get the most out of a top end rifle? I don't think I am any more, so I relent to the fact I have to shoot at bigger targets. Thats the difference between 1/4" and 3/4". Fortunately the targets I normally shoot at are even bigger, so an average rifle is good enough to keep them there. But that is not going to win some competitive competition...why I don't compete in them. It seems to me my groups with a top end rifle just isn't remarkably different to a good average rifle, because I am too much error. Its not a lot but its there. When I was very young I could shoot and optimise the best rifles.

    1/2 my rifles can outshoot me. 1/4 shoot to about what I can do. And a quarter I am handicapped by the rifle as it can't hold it there to what I can do. If tend to find what a rifle can deliver and then cut back to where it can comfortably "hold it there". Some of my springers want to shoot straight but, hold sensitive or what, they don't. Its not really the barrel, pellet, or power send off, its whats going on before it leaves the barrel. Which is why I use the saying: "the rifle wants to shoot accurately".

    So if you want absolute accuracy and can use that accuracy then you have to pay. But if you can't, then a plenty good enough rifle can keep it there and save you a bomb. All that extra cost is to get a tiny advantage against the competition if you can deliver. Thats why the top ten on a score board all have rifles that are proven to shoot tiny, but the difference is all how the marksmen read the rest. Its not the rifles. Gets to the stage the kit isn't reason for where on the score board a competitor lands; less than a bit of luck on the day. You can't buy yourself a win, its skill. But having said that to compete then the kit has to be tac driving from the start, which doesn't come cheap.

    For the rest of us mer mortals buy what at least can hold you there; and shoot at targets that are possible. Most good guns will do that, outshoot the shooter.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Newcastle-under-Lyme
    Posts
    3,636
    People are fascinating things.

    How many target shooters actually buy the very best and latest rifle because they need and can make use of that extra 3% of accuracy ... and how many buy them because they are the latest thing and God forbid they appear to be using 'last year's' kit?

    Does that housewife and young mother need that top of the range 4x4 to drop the 4 year old off at school half a mile away?

    I walked into a barbers in Milton a while back. Nice little place. Décor was basic but clean. Barber did a good job for a good price. He was having the place refurbished. I chatted to him and he said that he was having it all done up to look like a trendy barbers with all modern décor. The prices would be doubled. He explained that when money gets tight for the lower end of the market the folk that can still afford luxuries don't want the low end product ... or perceived low end product. They want to feel that they are a bit special and can afford something high end. It makes them feel they are in a certain 'group', even if they don't need that product. He said it will be the same barber ... in the same building ... doing the same haircuts ... with the same pair of scissors ... but a different clientele, with a few more quid to spend.

    Sounds familiar to me.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Chelmsford
    Posts
    2,041
    Bozzer hits the nail on the head there!

    The humble s400 simply embarrasses so called high end stuff, but people like to think because its more expensive its 'got' to be better, well it has to doesn't it
    bigtoe, Harry, hydroclamp, jpsnorton, gayle89, mark410, Stu83, smallholder1, wellhouse0, readingcop, sir-slots-alot, danco1987, Stevenb, DarylDiane, simpleSimon, Ratinator, Milek, Josh, Maxtich, Woodsie99, Ozzie, master_shriller, niloc, Drake267, deejayuu, shootingstars

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    peterborough
    Posts
    864
    Quote Originally Posted by 32:1 View Post
    Bozzer hits the nail on the head there!

    The humble s400 simply embarrasses so called high end stuff, )
    Sorry will have to disagree with that, the 400 is nice, accurate and competitively priced but there are plenty of things on it that could be better. The more you pay, the list of things that could be better(generally speaking) gets shorter.

    For what it’s worth, none of my guns have cost me more than £600, so I am not one of those who has to have the latest gear but I can appreciate why some guns do cost considerably more than other.

    Bb

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Exeter
    Posts
    35,662
    Quote Originally Posted by creed View Post
    I dare say this has been dwelt on before but yesterday,whilst visiting my friendly neighbourhood RFD I handled some rifles and enquired of prices as you do.
    Air Arms S400 £425
    FX Streamline £730 (I think)
    Weihrauch HW100 sporter £800
    Air Arms HFT500 £900 I will add for comparison purposes.
    Admittedly,it was the AA S410 I picked up but I would guess fit is about the same for a S400 although I am happy to be corrected.
    Yes,the HW100 was a slightly better fit on the day to me but the S400/410 was so close and I do think the German rifle seemed more "solid" but not twice the price more solid.Would it be twice as accurate?
    Thankfully,my hand would not fit around a Daystate thumbhole stock to reach the trigger so at least I am spared looking at £1000+ air rifles.
    At what point do you say to yourselves "enough of this lunacy.It's just an air rifle and I will not pay more than £xxx for one"?
    So maybe in the near future I will buy an S400 classic ...but that German rifle did seem awfully nice
    You have many things to consider, weight, shape, balance, feel, looks, shot count, cocking action, magazine capacity, anti double load, manufacturer support, and a few more besides, But of course you also pay for the name.
    I paid something like £80 more for my S510 than the S410 was at the time, because I don't like the S410 cocking bolt but did like the S510 side lever.

    I do however agree that "top end" pricing offers little over mid range performance for most people, although I did pay more for my used Rapids than for my new S510's & they're still far better rifles.

  12. #12
    phil384's Avatar
    phil384 is offline Likes to eat trifle wearing scuba gear
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Warlingham, Surrey
    Posts
    4,613
    Quote Originally Posted by bozzer View Post
    People are fascinating things.

    How many target shooters actually buy the very best and latest rifle because they need and can make use of that extra 3% of accuracy ... and how many buy them because they are the latest thing and God forbid they appear to be using 'last year's' kit?

    Does that housewife and young mother need that top of the range 4x4 to drop the 4 year old off at school half a mile away?

    I walked into a barbers in Milton a while back. Nice little place. Décor was basic but clean. Barber did a good job for a good price. He was having the place refurbished. I chatted to him and he said that he was having it all done up to look like a trendy barbers with all modern décor. The prices would be doubled. He explained that when money gets tight for the lower end of the market the folk that can still afford luxuries don't want the low end product ... or perceived low end product. They want to feel that they are a bit special and can afford something high end. It makes them feel they are in a certain 'group', even if they don't need that product. He said it will be the same barber ... in the same building ... doing the same haircuts ... with the same pair of scissors ... but a different clientele, with a few more quid to spend.

    Sounds familiar to me.
    Sounds familiar. Many moons ago I was a motorcycle mechanic. The garage I worked at was a Yamaha and BMW dealership. I worked on a Yamahas at £25 per hour and BMWs at £50 per hour (To the customer obviously). Same tools, same mechanic. Mental.

    So back on subject.....I'm not a target shooter. I have a BSA Ultra and the accuracy with JSB 4.53s is astonishing for £350. OK it might be nice to have more shots per fill, but I simply don't need anything better.
    Daystate Air Ranger FAC - Kral Bullpup & NP03 - CZ 452 .22lr - Lithgow 17hmr - Remington 783 .223 - Franchi 612vs 12G - Renato Gamba 12G O/U - Hatsan Escort 12G
    Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.....

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Leeds/Cheadle
    Posts
    10,612
    You're paying mostly for fit when it comes to more expensive rifles. I shot a GML S400 for years and it put a fair few HFT trophies in the cabinet, hardly standard though as the action was fettled and it was in a target stock. Out of the 5 most accurate rifles i've ever shot 2 were AA MPR's but when the trigger and fit is compared to something like a Steyr it's not in the same league. I suppose it really depends on the level of the shooter and what they're aiming for in the end, if it's competition level then a single target can mean the difference between world champ and not, believe me, been there.

    More often than not it's a standing or kneeling shot that makes the difference and that's where a really good trigger and fit make more of an impact. Accuracy wise, there's not much between a Steyr and a S400 if bench rested and shooting onto card.
    Chairman Emley Moor F.T.C. 2023 - Misfits champ, HFT extreme champ, NEFTA hunter champ, Midlands Hunter champ, UKAHFT champ.
    https://sites.google.com/site/emleymoorftc/contact-us

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    preston
    Posts
    527

    Air rifles

    The limiting factor for accuracy is the pellets, sizing,weighing and lubing is the only thing you can do after setting your rifle to fit you. I won't pay more than around a grand for an air rifle and I feel I am being ripped off at that. BUT if you want it you have to pay up and grit your teeth.
    mk2 rapid.22

  15. #15
    Jesim1's Avatar
    Jesim1 is offline Likes to wear driving gloves in the bedroom
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Wigan
    Posts
    4,939
    Price is always a touchy subject because there is never an actual thing to agree on as we are all individual and have different disposable income and views on "value for money".

    I often hear people on here complaining about the price of pellets - but to me they are £7/10 a tin and very cheap, so I have no issue - it's cheaper than smoking, but the same person may be paying £40/month for their phone - I do PAYG and it costs me about £3/month over the year - horses for courses.

    More expensive guns tend to become technically better up to a price point and then it starts going ballistic with paying hundreds of extra pounds for very little if any perceptible difference/gain. You also get the diminishing returns for price - so an extra £100 may get you something slightly better, but an extra £500 is only slightly better again - and so on till you can throw an extra grand at it with no perceptible difference to performance at all - but if you have the money and want to spend it that way then fair play.

    My son wants designer cloths which are no better quality than what I wear but are 10x+ the price - he does not understand that although I can afford designed gear they simply do nothing for me, so I choose better value items which do the same job - and he genuinely struggles with this concept! I do like cars though - and guess what - he don't understand why I spend so much on them

    James
    Making a mockery of growing old gracefully since I retired

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •