Results 1 to 15 of 44

Thread: .22 hornet

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Banbury, Oxon
    Posts
    2,995

    Thumbs up

    Quote Originally Posted by themariners View Post
    I use a 22 hornet for pests rats target shooting at close range pidgeons etc
    I use a 20 grain gamo 22 lead ball 13 grains of black powder compressed with a cardboard lubed wad
    The round travels at 4800 feet per second
    I think you may have made a typo.

  2. #2
    themariners Guest
    Which bit

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Banbury, Oxon
    Posts
    2,995
    Bullet speed seems a tad ambitious.

  4. #4
    themariners Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Guesty View Post
    Bullet speed seems a tad ambitious.
    Until you try it over a chrono as I have you can’t make a comment try it then report back

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Devizes
    Posts
    5,032
    Quote Originally Posted by themariners View Post
    Until you try it over a chrono as I have you can’t make a comment try it then report back
    I would suggest you try it in a universal breech and report back, confirming that you are not wildly over pressure with that velocity, if the velocity is correct.
    Thanks for looking

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Banbury, Oxon
    Posts
    2,995
    Quote Originally Posted by themariners View Post
    Until you try it over a chrono as I have you can’t make a comment try it then report back
    I don't need a chrono to know that a Hornet isn't going to get a 20 grain projectile to 4800fps with black powder.
    You do know that's more than 1000fps quicker than a 17 Hornet can manage using modern powders?

  7. #7
    Parabuteo is offline My Chrony has bought it a couple of times...
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Southampton
    Posts
    6,061
    Blimey.

    As the bear suggests, if your empties are giving you a stiff bolt lift, on something as small as a Hornet, well, its a classic sign of over pressure (quite bad overpressure as it goes, usual early signs are flattened or cratered primers and the case being burnished by the opening bolt rubbing on the case head).

    Your cases are not able to spring back and eject which means the poor little things are not well.
    I'm a maggot in another life you know

  8. #8
    themariners Guest
    the Hmr head doesent weight 18 grains quite a bit more

  9. #9
    Randy Bohannon's Avatar
    Randy Bohannon is offline “Junes1 is a whining bellend”
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    London
    Posts
    28,522
    Quote Originally Posted by themariners View Post
    Most feral people that don’t own any land call people
    Idiots when they have never met them so it’s very relevant
    You have also never tried the round or the that bullet weight or even
    Have access to a chrono unless someone lends you one on the lent land you shoot on

    Any chance of explaining the physics of getting 155% more velocity from a bullet of more than 57% of the mass whilst using a powder charge containing ~67% energy than a smokeless loaded .22 hornet with a 35 grain bullet?
    "An infinite number of monkeys banging away at type writers for an infinite period of time will eventually reproduce Hamlet" Thanks to discussion forums we now know this to be untrue.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Devizes
    Posts
    5,032
    Quote Originally Posted by themariners View Post
    the Hmr head doesent weight 18 grains quite a bit more
    Um, no one mentioned HMR, which are commonly 17 or 20 gr loads and gets nowhere near your quoted figures (2250ish with a 20gr) using modern powder, ok probably only only 5 gr of powder but smaller cartridge so higher pressure, tripling the powder won't more than double the velocity.

    If you're referring to Guesty's post then he is talking .17 hornet, same cartridge as yours necked down and renowned as a bit of a speed demon for capacity, yet it falls 1000 fps short of your reported figure without the wad slowing things down and using modern powder.
    Thanks for looking

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Exeter
    Posts
    35,840
    I'd hazard a guess that the chrono is reading bit's of wadding blown out ahead of the ball

    I can manage 3450fps with a nice aerodynamic 30gn from my "K" but that's a compressed load 13.7gn of lil-gun, & under 750fpe

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Devizes
    Posts
    5,032
    Quote Originally Posted by Guesty View Post
    Bullet speed seems a tad ambitious.
    It not the bullet speed, its the round speed, I guess the whole thing blows out of the chamber!!
    Thanks for looking

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •