Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Air Strippers - what if the barrel itself was a cone??

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Chichester
    Posts
    1,191

    Air Strippers - what if the barrel itself was a cone??

    Day off, few hours shooting this morning, couple of hours in the workshop fettling

    I have touched on this before, when looking into muzzle end shapes - not crowns as I see that as the intersection where the very point the internal bore meets the end face of the barrel.

    Advised logic is to have some form of concave end be it the mythical 11 degrees, or just a recess, its always said this is to protect the crown - makes sense, but...

    When is the last time you saw a PCP with nothing on the end, moderator, stripper, brake, shroud??

    I have always had a sceptical view of the common belief of how strippers work, that is the stripping away of turbulent air so not disrupting the pellet, I am not so sure about that.

    However my limited experience is one advantage lies in reducing muzzle flip by disrupting/dispersing the jet that comes out the end, in that sense they work (don't like brakes that send the air up - in winter it masks the view of the pellet flight).

    I also absolutely believe they act as surrogate barrel tuners when people move the cones around so altering the harmonics.

    So in those senses they do have a positive effect, however every time I look at one I think if the idea is get as much of the jetting air away from the pellet as quick as possible surely a concave ended muzzle is not the best idea - what about a cone facing a cone?


    https://photos.app.goo.gl/39y3XrXuxXAq5DXw2


    I would like to try it with a long thin type adjustable stripper but only have a Steyr double cone so machined a Lothar barrel end like the cone of the stripper and placed the crown such that the edge of the head of the pellet is just entering the cone before the tail leaves the crown.

    Result, well it definitely sounds different, still loud but less of a crack, accuracy, just shot 30 through it benched out to 40 yards and definitely tighter than the bare barrel, maybe even a tad tighter than with the shroud that was fitted....need to shoot some more, maybe next week.
    ..."My son," said the Norman Baron...."The Saxon is not like us Normans. His manners are not so polite. But he never means anything serious till he talks about justice and right"...

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Malta, sometimes London
    Posts
    5,881
    I guess only high speed photography that can make out gas flow - sorry I don't remember how it's done, but the Cardews did it - will show what is going on and the differences between a near flat muzzle end, and the cone you have created.

    Theoretically the cone shape will allow air from around the muzzle to flow more easily in the direction of the muzzle blast - the blast itself is high pressure but flowing forwards it will create a low pressure zone around it just as it exits and should "pull" surrounding air - the cone ought to make it easier for this to happen, so the blast ought to be somewhat smoother. But it's also a question of time - if the blast were a continuous flow that's one thing, but since it is not, there may not be enough time for any of this to happen meaningfully - the pellet may well already be several metres from the muzzle by then.

    One of those things where you either need specialised equipment to understand what is happening, or you just compare end results and conclude that something is or is not working, even though you may not understand exactly why.
    Last edited by air-tech; 16-03-2018 at 06:03 PM. Reason: Shoddy writing :)
    **WANTED**: WEBLEY PATRIOT MUZZLE END; Any Diana/Original mod.50 parts, especially OPEN SIGHTS

  3. #3
    eyebull's Avatar
    eyebull is offline Even a stopped clock is right twice a day
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Borehamwood
    Posts
    6,769
    I wonder if there is a (safe!) way of colouring the air, to make it easier to discern what is going on when viewing in slow-motion?
    Good deals with these members

  4. #4
    Turnup's Avatar
    Turnup is offline Dialling code‎: ‎01344
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Crowthorne
    Posts
    5,491
    Schlieren photography can reveal small density changes in air (such as caused by turbulent air flow) and can be combined with video recording or flash illuminaton. It might be necessary to construct a stripper from some transparent material to allow a full visualisation.
    True freedom includes the freedom to make mistakes or do foolish things and bear the consequences.
    TANSTAAFL

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    hartlepool
    Posts
    353
    I used to have a Ripley ar5s were the barrel was machined like that.Probably the most accurate least pellet fussy rifle I’ve had.Should never have sold it.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    New Milton, Hampshire
    Posts
    14,389
    There's a big difference between a shock wave and flow. One is a pressure wave propagating through the medium, the other is the medium moving.

  7. #7
    Turnup's Avatar
    Turnup is offline Dialling code‎: ‎01344
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Crowthorne
    Posts
    5,491
    Quote Originally Posted by RobF View Post
    There's a big difference between a shock wave and flow. One is a pressure wave propagating through the medium, the other is the medium moving.
    Yes there is, and Schlieren photography can reveal both. I once took a Schlieren photograph of the turbulent heated air rising off my outstretched hand.

    EDIT: more precisely it reveals density differences, from which flow can be deduced.
    True freedom includes the freedom to make mistakes or do foolish things and bear the consequences.
    TANSTAAFL

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    New Milton, Hampshire
    Posts
    14,389
    Quote Originally Posted by Turnup View Post
    Yes there is, and Schlieren photography can reveal both. I once took a Schlieren photograph of the turbulent heated air rising off my outstretched hand.

    EDIT: more precisely it reveals density differences, from which flow can be deduced.
    Yep. Because density changes cause a change in IOR.

    You can do it without but you need a collimated light source against a background (like the sun) which essentially Schlieren is. I've captured shock wave IOR changes off planes. These aren't the puffy clouds causes by low pressure condensation, these are rifts that displace wing tips or background objects along a pressure wave. This isn't mine. But you can see the effect on a background.

    https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3928/...8e5f642b_h.jpg

    You can also see the spherical shockwave off an explosion preceding the blast.

    http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/image...sion1_copy.jpg

    I experimented with Schlieren a few years ago by using a telescope to collimate a normal light source by reversing it (placing the light in the ocular) and then the subject in the objective and projecting the image against a wall. You can see simple effects like the turbulent air coming off a match quite easily, however you need a lot of light and for high speed work you need a real lot of light in a short duration. Last time I looked into it the suitable source for it was a few grand.

    People often see a shots of a turbulent column behind projectiles and assume this is pushing the pellet and thus make the leap that it overtakes the pellet... however it's caused by the pellet moving through the air, it's drag. That's what drag is, how much air is pulled behind an object with it. No surprise then that the more slippery shapes have less turbulence behind them. This is why F1 cars are difficult to overtake because their aero causes lots of turbulent air behind... and as we know if they lower the downforce they go faster.

    http://specialised-imaging.com/img/img_large/img_12.jpg

    Above you can see the bullet is way away from the muzzle blast, but it still has turbulence behind it, just like a boat always has a turbulent wake (not the V shaped one)... and it doesn matter if it's doing 40kt in a canal or open lake that's always there.

    You will see a drop in pressure waves etc from a brake or stripper, but it doesn't mean that pellet has suddenly been stripped of the turbulence behind it. Same as putting the boat in a canal, it just contains it, for a moment. It can't magically remove it. And just like a wake takes time to react to the walls of the canal and the boat is always ahead then it's always ahead of any turbulence it's creating. Shock waves are the things which over take the pellet not turbulence... hence my original point... people see Schlieren and assume the overtaking shockwaves are flow...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •