Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: .223 case mouth size?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Rossendale, Lancashire
    Posts
    1,360
    Quote Originally Posted by miroku6.5 View Post
    Hi
    My 222 brass
    Measurement internal Neck dia after sizing =.222 so about two tho NK tension
    So think your right on the expander ball
    👍
    Thanks, I'd have expected about .002" neck tension. Thing is I've gone and ran ALL my brass through these dies so didn't have an old sized case to check and compare.

    Quote Originally Posted by sarge4318 View Post
    If it is consistent and you've not been getting any trouble leave it alone.

    Do you neck crimp?
    I can't leave it alone, if the necks are too tight and won't fit on the case trimmer they're not much good!

    I don't crimp unless there's a cannelure, and that's pretty rare, so no I don't.

    Cheers
    Greg

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Driffield, East Yorkshire
    Posts
    3,052
    Have you measured the expander ball?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Rossendale, Lancashire
    Posts
    1,360
    Quote Originally Posted by pothunter View Post
    Have you measured the expander ball?
    Measures .220" which must be undersize surely. I'd expect this to measure about .223" to allow the brass to contract back down to .222". I don't have another one to check and compare but will order a new expander tomorrow anyway.

    Cheers
    Greg

  4. #4
    Parabuteo is offline My Chrony has bought it a couple of times...
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Southampton
    Posts
    6,061
    You do not need a canelure to crimp unless it is a roll crimp. We crimp match bullets for use in AR15s regularly which improves consistency. Lee are quite clear on thsi in their instructions that you do not need a canelured bullet.

    That said IF the bullet has a canelure, I will adjust the die to crim into it.
    I'm a maggot in another life you know

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Rossendale, Lancashire
    Posts
    1,360
    Quote Originally Posted by Parabuteo View Post
    You do not need a canelure to crimp unless it is a roll crimp. We crimp match bullets for use in AR15s regularly which improves consistency. Lee are quite clear on thsi in their instructions that you do not need a canelured bullet.

    That said IF the bullet has a canelure, I will adjust the die to crim into it.
    I have a Lee factory crimp for the .223. I did some experiments with it and personally found no advantage accuracy-wise to crimping. It's an extra step and puts more stress into the brass. I've heard that it improves reliability cycling through rifles like the AR15, but that's not an issue with the type of rifle I have.

    New expander button is on it's way, will update with results!

    Cheers
    Greg

  6. #6
    Parabuteo is offline My Chrony has bought it a couple of times...
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Southampton
    Posts
    6,061
    Quote Originally Posted by Thegreg View Post
    I have a Lee factory crimp for the .223. I did some experiments with it and personally found no advantage accuracy-wise to crimping. It's an extra step and puts more stress into the brass. I've heard that it improves reliability cycling through rifles like the AR15, but that's not an issue with the type of rifle I have.

    New expander button is on it's way, will update with results!

    Cheers
    Greg
    Its chief advantage is to dummy the loading into the landes effect. By loading into the landes the peak let off pressure is usually more consistant. Obviously if you are loading for a magazine length you dont get the ability as a rule.

    This is proven, and I have seen the proof over all the rifles I have used when loaded to mag length. There is a science behind it. Clearly back when I was loading for F Class we did not have to worry about it, and I managed a 6fps ES on my load eventually (measured independantly be several chronos). Thank god I am out of that one

    It produces next to no extra stress in the brass as it is right at the very end of the neck. It really only increases reliability where you have semi or full auto capability.

    Another consideration may be a collet sizer which will produce a much better more consistant neck, but again it's Lee I use Lee in a Forster press, along side RCBS, Redding, Wilson and Forster dies and they all work well. True, you need to know what you are doing with the Lee dies and they need lubrication (of the collet and cone faces etc) but they work well
    I'm a maggot in another life you know

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Rossendale, Lancashire
    Posts
    1,360
    Quote Originally Posted by Parabuteo View Post

    Another consideration may be a collet sizer which will produce a much better more consistant neck, but again it's Lee I use Lee in a Forster press, along side RCBS, Redding, Wilson and Forster dies and they all work well. True, you need to know what you are doing with the Lee dies and they need lubrication (of the collet and cone faces etc) but they work well
    If the new expander button doesn't cure the problem I'll look at getting a collet die set, or possibly an expander mandrel. I use the Lee collet die set in my .375 H&H and it does work very well. I might end up getting one for the .223 too!

    Cheers
    Greg

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Driffield, East Yorkshire
    Posts
    3,052
    Quote Originally Posted by Thegreg View Post
    Measures .220" which must be undersize surely. I'd expect this to measure about .223" to allow the brass to contract back down to .222". I don't have another one to check and compare but will order a new expander tomorrow anyway.

    Cheers
    Greg
    It does seem a bit undersize, on various dies that I have had the expander has varied between .221 to .223, apart from Lee collet dies which had a .220 mandrel as they are squishing the neck onto a mandrel rather than using an expander to push a neck out that has already been undersized by the die.
    Too much neck tension is usually avoided, but..., if the ammunition that you are making gives good accuracy with that degree of tension, I would probably take a little material off the trimmer pilot so that it fits the neck.

    Many knock Lee stuff but I have been quite happy with the results from collet neck sizing dies.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Rossendale, Lancashire
    Posts
    1,360
    Quote Originally Posted by pothunter View Post
    It does seem a bit undersize, on various dies that I have had the expander has varied between .221 to .223, apart from Lee collet dies which had a .220 mandrel as they are squishing the neck onto a mandrel rather than using an expander to push a neck out that has already been undersized by the die.
    Too much neck tension is usually avoided, but..., if the ammunition that you are making gives good accuracy with that degree of tension, I would probably take a little material off the trimmer pilot so that it fits the neck.

    Many knock Lee stuff but I have been quite happy with the results from collet neck sizing dies.
    Thanks for the reply. The sizes you have quoted sound right to me. I think it'd be way too much neck tension if it were left as it is. I've changed to this die set from one I was borrowing so it's the die set that's the issue, I'm convinced of it. I know it'd be easy to polish the pilot down a bit but I didn't have this problem before and would rather leave things as standard.

    I think I'll get a Lee collet die set for what they cost. Once I've fired the fully sized brass I'll neck size using the Lee and see how they do.

    Cheers
    Greg

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •