Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: The W. H. B. Smith 1950’s shoot-off: BSA MK2 Airsporter vs. Diana Model 50

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Wooster
    Posts
    3,532
    Quote Originally Posted by Shed tuner View Post
    I meant just a weaker spring, not an alteration. If it makes it nices to shoot, you'll enjoy shooting it more... I'm thinking you weren't planning on hunting with it

    My mk2 runs around 9FP and isn't too harsh at all...
    Harsh may be a “harsh” term lol. I’m comparing it to a 6 fpe heavy gun in the Diana. If I was comparing it to my Beeman C1 it surely would be the smoother one? The trigger and sights of the Diana are just a treat. Maybe these early ones are under appreciated; graceful lines and great natural shooters.
    Last edited by 45flint; 26-04-2018 at 12:03 PM.

  2. #2
    Hsing-ee's Avatar
    Hsing-ee is offline may also be employed in conjunction with a drawn reciprocation dingle arm, to reduce sinusoidal repleneration
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    18,270
    Quote Originally Posted by 45flint View Post
    Harsh may be a “harsh” term lol. I’m comparing it to a 6 fpe heavy gun in the Diana. If I was comparing it to my Beeman C1 it surely would be the smoother one? The trigger and sights of the Diana are just a treat. Maybe these early ones are under appreciated; graceful lines and great natural shooters.
    My old Mk 2 Airsporter would 'BOING' like a big piece of panty elastic when it went off, it gave 12 fpe power too. Trimming the spring, as Jon says, makes it far more well-mannered and enjoyable to shoot, as well as accurate.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •