Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 25

Thread: Binoculars for hunting

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    sunderland
    Posts
    866

    Binoculars for hunting

    Anyone recomend light pair binoculars idea for hunting.price range £100-120.thanks

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    East Midlands, 6 chains from the graveyard.
    Posts
    8,416
    For that sort of price you can get some quite nice compact Hawkes, Nature Trek 10x25 at around £90 full price, or for a bit more quality Endurance ED 10x25 at around £130 full price.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Reading, Berks
    Posts
    13,730
    I’d go for the Bushnell H2O (fully waterproof) they come 8x42 and 10x42 not sure how good they are at dusk though
    And then an ice hockey game broke out: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G0woZ...layer_embedded
    son got MOM in world championships: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZoCcYwNJxv4

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    aberdeenshire
    Posts
    25,209
    My laser range finder is a 6x25 and its fine for using to spot bunnies at rim fire ranges I shoot . So it cover 2 items for me.

    https://www.amazon.co.uk/Visionking-...g+range+finder

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Bruton
    Posts
    6,592
    There are basically three price ranges for binos.

    Up to £200: they range from totally rubbish to OK.

    £300-500: from OK to really good.

    £1000+: awesome (Swarovski, Zeiss, Leica...). Some of the £300-500 stuff gets very close to these (Nikon, for example).

    Binos are worth investing in, if you can. Buy once, use forever.

    The best value in binos is often a porro-prism design (the old-fashioned dog-leg WW2 U-Boat commander style, not the newer roof prism with two tubes on a hinge style). Roof prisms are better, but at the £100 level, good porros are a great buy.

    Do not go below 30mm lenses. Or over 40-42. 7 or 8-8.5 power mag is what you need. 6 would do, but is rare. Never buy variable-power, you don't need it and it usually is rubbish (mail order catalogues push things like cheap 8-21x25mm; they are all awful).

    Best place to research is a birdwatcher forum. Those guys really care about their glass.

    Check out the Bresser 8x40 or Avalon 8x32. Or used Steiners.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    Burnley
    Posts
    19
    I had this dilemma a couple of months ago when my very old glasses were beyond economical repair. My budget was 150 quid.
    I looked through a lot, but settled on a pair of Vortex Diamondback 8x32.
    In a back to back with the Hawke ED and Minox offerings, the diamondbacks just came to the eye better.
    A bit over my budget, but I'm very pleased with them.
    Look through as many as you can in various light settings if possible, to compare contrast, brightness and light gathering.
    Atb

    Chris
    “It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society.”

    Jiddu Krishnamurti

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Bath
    Posts
    3,081
    Quote Originally Posted by Lon'gun View Post
    I had this dilemma a couple of months ago when my very old glasses were beyond economical repair. My budget was 150 quid.
    I looked through a lot, but settled on a pair of Vortex Diamondback 8x32.
    In a back to back with the Hawke ED and Minox offerings, the diamondbacks just came to the eye better.
    A bit over my budget, but I'm very pleased with them.
    Look through as many as you can in various light settings if possible, to compare contrast, brightness and light gathering.
    Atb

    Chris
    +1 for Diamondback 8x32.. great bins for the cash, excellent size. I compared them with £300 Nikon, hawk, Zeiss, kowa, and the only thing that really rivaled them was the kowa. They were just as bright but the kowa was easier on the eye. I just didn't feel that twice the money was worth it, especially with the vortex guarantee.
    They whipped the floor with lots of £50-£150 bins so I thought they were great value.
    Rhys

    Ps.. try the different sizes in one range.. I found the 8x32 much nicer than the 8x42's in a few different brands so make sure as said above, that you spend some time in a decent shop really trying them all. Even stuff more expensive so you can get a feel for where the value is

    Happy bins hunting
    "corners should be round" Theo Evo .22/.177 - Meopta 6x42, DS huntsman classic .20 vortex razor LH 3-15x42 under supervised boingrati tuning by Tony L & Tinbum, HW77 forest green - Nikon prostaff 2-7x32 plex.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    bideford
    Posts
    2,916
    Quote Originally Posted by NigelG View Post
    I’d go for the Bushnell H2O (fully waterproof) they come 8x42 and 10x42 not sure how good they are at dusk though
    ANother vote here for the H20. Really good glass
    I have the 8x42 and these compare very well to more expensive brands in the field.
    I don't take them out hunting though.
    B.A.S.C. member

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    sunderland
    Posts
    866
    ok lads thanks for ya input,ill check all bins out ya recomended.ive also joined a bird watching forum ill ask there and see which bins get mentioned the most.thanks again folks

  10. #10
    Blackrider's Avatar
    Blackrider is offline It don't mean a thing, if it ain't got a Spring
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Perthshire the Heart of Scotland !
    Posts
    9,361
    All good advice and I'll add one more point !
    Not always practical but the best time to check out a pair of binoculars is dawn or dusk or in poorer light levels.
    Years back when choosing mine I spent one and a half hours peering through four different pairs of quality bins before I eventually chose one.
    “An airgun or two”………

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    An Clachan
    Posts
    20,548
    Quote Originally Posted by Geezer View Post
    There are basically three price ranges for binos.

    Up to £200: they range from totally rubbish to OK.

    £300-500: from OK to really good.

    £1000+: awesome (Swarovski, Zeiss, Leica...). Some of the £300-500 stuff gets very close to these (Nikon, for example).

    Binos are worth investing in, if you can. Buy once, use forever.

    The best value in binos is often a porro-prism design (the old-fashioned dog-leg WW2 U-Boat commander style, not the newer roof prism with two tubes on a hinge style). Roof prisms are better, but at the £100 level, good porros are a great buy.

    Do not go below 30mm lenses. Or over 40-42. 7 or 8-8.5 power mag is what you need. 6 would do, but is rare. Never buy variable-power, you don't need it and it usually is rubbish (mail order catalogues push things like cheap 8-21x25mm; they are all awful).

    Best place to research is a birdwatcher forum. Those guys really care about their glass.

    Check out the Bresser 8x40 or Avalon 8x32. Or used Steiners.
    ^ All good info that. Especially the advice on earwiging in on twitchers preferences.
    Quote Originally Posted by Beach Ball Steve View Post
    Cut from the same mad socialist cloth as wee Nippy. No wonder you're rooting for her Wullie.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Horsham West Sussex
    Posts
    331
    I’m made up with my Barr and Stroud 8 x 42 Saharas for around £70. Nice bright and sharp image only downside is the weight for they are a little heavy. There are smaller options in the range.

    I wouldn’t go big on the magnification as you get wobble. 8 x ideal in my view.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    sunderland
    Posts
    866
    Quote Originally Posted by Simonsays View Post
    I’m made up with my Barr and Stroud 8 x 42 Saharas for around £70. Nice bright and sharp image only downside is the weight for they are a little heavy. There are smaller options in the range.

    I wouldn’t go big on the magnification as you get wobble. 8 x ideal in my view.
    i asked about these sahara on birdwatching forum,yea supposed be decent but 1 guy says sierra model is slightly better than saharas,only only 7 quid more so i bought them.cheers simon and everyone else input.rob

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Horsham West Sussex
    Posts
    331
    Quote Originally Posted by robhw97k View Post
    i asked about these sahara on birdwatching forum,yea supposed be decent but 1 guy says sierra model is slightly better than saharas,only only 7 quid more so i bought them.cheers simon and everyone else input.rob
    Ok good. I’d be interested to know what you think of them.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    sunderland
    Posts
    866
    Quote Originally Posted by Simonsays View Post
    Ok good. I’d be interested to know what you think of them.
    No probs mate ill pm ya after few days of use,tell ya what they like.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •