Sliding breeches can crush digits, but break-barrels can smash teeth and noses. You pay your money and take your chances...
Sliding breeches can crush digits, but break-barrels can smash teeth and noses. You pay your money and take your chances...
THE BOINGER BASH AT QUIGLEY HOLLOW. MAKING GREAT MEMORIES SINCE 15th JUNE, 2013.
NEXT EVENT :- August 3/4, 2024.........BOING!!
Far too many rifles to list now, all mainly British but the odd pesky foreigner has snuck in
Short and stumpy, preferrably a gas-sham. The lack of mechanical advantage means the extra effort allows one to be hit in the face, break the stock AND possibly get your fingers/web of the hand pinched or crushed in the breech when it 'kangaroos' the unfortunate shooter. The scope should be destroyed when the brute hits the ground scope-down in accordance with Murphy's Law.
A HW35 Export with its nice long lever is perfectly controllable.
Didn't Hitler's people dream one up like that that could shoot round corners?
Well, for a few shots anyway!
THE BOINGER BASH AT QUIGLEY HOLLOW. MAKING GREAT MEMORIES SINCE 15th JUNE, 2013.
NEXT EVENT :- August 3/4, 2024.........BOING!!
Yes
Krummlauf Curved Barrel on an StG-44
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HSsFiS2Voxg
The Krummlauf. Or, more correctly, the Vorsatz J (or I) and Vorstaz Pz. Originally a way (Pz = Panzer, 90 degree bend) of letting tank crews engage infantry without sticking their heads above the open hatch. Also developed (I or J, 30 degree bend) for infantry in trench or urban warfare.
Not sure it ever saw service. Never replicated by any other army. Which tells you something about its utility, 72 years later.
Back on topic. Tap-loader, anyone? Surely it's not just me?
Yep, it's just you.Back on topic. Tap-loader, anyone? Surely it's not just me?
Any system where the pellet isn't seated in the barrel = Pants.
And I'm including the Steyr 5 in that.
I have a couple of accurate pistols that are gate loaders, one of them like the Steyr, and also a Hammerli tap-loader rifle that was egregiously more accurate than the others of its time. I am going to test it with modern pellets once I have overhauled it and got the odd size scope mounts it needs from the post office, where I get most of my kit.
I also have an Original 50 which has been converted by an amateur to direct-breech loading, but it has been done rather imperfectly, giving 2 fpe which I do not think is an improvement on the original Original Diana power. I have yet to strip it to see how it has been achieved, I think it might have been by putting a huge lump of metal in front of the piston which slides back and forth. This combines a shorter stroke with a massively long transfer port.
Overall, I don't like non-direct-loading systems though, they are just not robust enough - how can it be consistent?