Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 82

Thread: Who would not buy an Air-Arms HW99-type break-barrel after pleading for one?

  1. #1
    Hsing-ee's Avatar
    Hsing-ee is offline may also be employed in conjunction with a drawn reciprocation dingle arm, to reduce sinusoidal repleneration
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    18,244

    Who would not buy an Air-Arms HW99-type break-barrel after pleading for one?

    Air Arms must be sick to their elbows of enthusiasts bleating for a 'new break barrel', tailored for the UK market.

    The Pro-Elite was not a big seller for them, so I can see why it might put them off. A really good mid-size break-barrel, like a quality version of the HW99S, might take sales away from their TX200HC and ProSport but give them less profit per unit.

    Say they do cave in and make one, it wouldn't be difficult for them to actually do it. A piece of cake.

    But would people buy them? We have been here before; the clamouring for a reissue of the Feinwerkbau Sport, and a clamouring for Custom Stocks of Sheffield to make HW99S stocks.

    There were about 3 Feinwerkbau Sporters sold in the UK, maybe 10 in the USA. And maybe three HW99S CSS stocks sold in the UK.

    If Air Arms sell a UK market break barrel it might well be the same. It will be more expensive than the HW99S, so budget-minded people will prefer the Weihrauch; and for a bit more outlay, richer people could get the TX200 - so they will.

    It might be that only 30 are sold in the UK.... I can see why they might not judge it a good business proposition.
    Last edited by Hsing-ee; 29-05-2018 at 04:13 PM.

  2. #2
    tinbum's Avatar
    tinbum is online now Killer Vampire Lesbians on scooters
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Daarn Saaarf!
    Posts
    19,478
    Head - Nail - Wallop!
    God rest ye jelly mental men

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Long Eaton, (Derby/Notts)
    Posts
    6,188
    It’s a valid point and I guess the biggest factor will be ‘over time’

    Not so long ago probably circa 10 years+ the 99s wasn’t actually held in very high esteem many people overlooked this rifle and many dismissed it.

    There were quite a few negative reviews back in those days certainly well before the shed tuners had that chance to mooch inside and then it just flicked the lightbulb moment snowballed into something ideal over night.

    Once they started to gain popularity it was then followed by the good reviews then it was a tuners tick box and the rest is history as they say.

    I think if AA did offer something it’s hard to see what the outcome would be as it depends on so many different factors.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Cambridge UK
    Posts
    7,071
    Quote Originally Posted by oldskoolzzz View Post
    It’s a valid point and I guess the biggest factor will be ‘over time’

    Not so long ago probably circa 10 years+ the 99s wasn’t actually held in very high esteem many people overlooked this rifle and many dismissed it.

    There were quite a few negative reviews back in those days certainly well before the shed tuners had that chance to mooch inside and then it just flicked the lightbulb moment snowballed into something ideal over night.

    Once they started to gain popularity it was then followed by the good reviews then it was a tuners tick box and the rest is history as they say.

    I think if AA did offer something it’s hard to see what the outcome would be as it depends on so many different factors.
    I tend to think the above is a very pertinent post. If AA produced a mediocre break barrel that requires fettling before it becomes acceptable and competitive against the opposition then I cannot see it being a success.
    To be a success it has to meet the opposition head on and then some for quality, reliability and performance. So, no galling issues, no cut unfinished spring ends, no boings that jar your teeth (assuming you have some). Maybe the market would accept a small premium in price, but get that wrong and it will sink.
    Just my take ..
    Cheers, Phil

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    middlesbrough
    Posts
    8,854
    People would/should only buy the TX if it suits there needs. A 99 style rifle from AA would appeal to hunters and younger shooters, surely?
    LOOKING FOR A BSA ULTRA IN .177 and .25

  6. #6
    tinbum's Avatar
    tinbum is online now Killer Vampire Lesbians on scooters
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Daarn Saaarf!
    Posts
    19,478
    I can’t see the point in a 99 style rifle, it’s poorly made and struggles in .177. Now if they made a 95 style rifle with a better end block it would be a different matter.....
    God rest ye jelly mental men

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    bideford
    Posts
    2,916
    Quote Originally Posted by tinbum View Post
    I can’t see the point in a 99 style rifle, it’s poorly made and struggles in .177. Now if they made a 95 style rifle with a better end block it would be a different matter.....
    It only needs to be 99 in proportions. Just designed and made properly
    B.A.S.C. member

  8. #8
    tinbum's Avatar
    tinbum is online now Killer Vampire Lesbians on scooters
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Daarn Saaarf!
    Posts
    19,478
    Quote Originally Posted by robs5230 View Post
    It only needs to be 99 in proportions. Just designed and made properly
    With slightly more oomph!
    God rest ye jelly mental men

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Batley
    Posts
    1,527
    The problem i think they would run into is the hw99s is £185 at my local rfd and im thinking if air arms made a similar rifle but higher quality the top end price would have to be no more than £250 and im not sure air arms would price them at that or more like £300+

    To be fair i would still buy one but would someone who just wants a decent rifle choose one over a hw im not so sure.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    middlesbrough
    Posts
    8,854
    Quote Originally Posted by robs5230 View Post
    It only needs to be 99 in proportions. Just designed and made properly
    Exactly
    LOOKING FOR A BSA ULTRA IN .177 and .25

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    pembury
    Posts
    740
    Quote Originally Posted by tinbum View Post
    I can’t see the point in a 99 style rifle, it’s poorly made and struggles in .177. Now if they made a 95 style rifle with a better end block it would be a different matter.....
    From what I've experienced with my short stroked 95 & 98 ….this would be exactly the right starting point from my perspective...BUT specifically made for the 12 FPE limit.

    Cheers Steve

  12. #12
    tinbum's Avatar
    tinbum is online now Killer Vampire Lesbians on scooters
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Daarn Saaarf!
    Posts
    19,478
    Quote Originally Posted by Weasle View Post
    From what I've experienced with my short stroked 95 & 98 ….this would be exactly the right starting point from my perspective...BUT specifically made for the 12 FPE limit.

    Cheers Steve
    The 99 is 71mm and the 95/98 is 85mm, I reckon a 75mm stroke would be ideal for the uk in 26mm, but 25mm x 80mm would be better. Trouble is with the varying limits worldwide it would be a very niche market.
    God rest ye jelly mental men

  13. #13
    look no hands's Avatar
    look no hands is online now Even better looking than a HW35
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Coventry, even closer to Tony L.
    Posts
    12,064
    The only reason the 99 is so popular now is that it runs perfectly at our 12ftp power limits (I remember talking to Tony Wall about it many years ago and he said he wouldn't even touch them, different story now), if it didn't then no one would bother with it and would just stick with the 95 instead, the Pro Elite was just a glorified HW80, big, brash, powerful and made for the US market but the 80 had it's feet well under the yankee table years before, the thing is not everyone wants to carry a big lump around all day.

    I don't think that people are expecting the new AA BB to be another 99 but they want it to perform like one but would be happy with it being the size of a 95, personally I don't want AA to produce a rifle to compete with the 99 on price and performance, I want it to outperform the 99, 95, 98, in fact all of the current BB's on the markets and if I have to pay £300 for it, then so be it, as for the new FWB sport, that was just ugly and overpriced.

    Pete
    Far too many rifles to list now, all mainly British but the odd pesky foreigner has snuck in

  14. #14
    tinbum's Avatar
    tinbum is online now Killer Vampire Lesbians on scooters
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Daarn Saaarf!
    Posts
    19,478
    Quote Originally Posted by look no hands View Post
    The only reason the 99 is so popular now is that it runs perfectly at our 12ftp power limits (I remember talking to Tony Wall about it many years ago and he said he wouldn't even touch them, different story now), if it didn't then no one would bother with it and would just stick with the 95 instead, the Pro Elite was just a glorified HW80, big, brash, powerful and made for the US market but the 80 had it's feet well under the yankee table years before, the thing is not everyone wants to carry a big lump around all day.

    I don't think that people are expecting the new AA BB to be another 99 but they want it to perform like one but would be happy with it being the size of a 95, personally I don't want AA to produce a rifle to compete with the 99 on price and performance, I want it to outperform the 99, 95, 98, in fact all of the current BB's on the markets and if I have to pay £300 for it, then so be it, as for the new FWB sport, that was just ugly and overpriced.

    Pete
    I agree with all of that, but think it would be closer to £400. On the plus side it would be good looking, well made, not self destruct and the trigger would be usuable for non orangutans.
    God rest ye jelly mental men

  15. #15
    look no hands's Avatar
    look no hands is online now Even better looking than a HW35
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Coventry, even closer to Tony L.
    Posts
    12,064
    Quote Originally Posted by tinbum View Post
    I agree with all of that, but think it would be closer to £400. On the plus side it would be good looking, well made, not self destruct and the trigger would be usuable for non orangutans.
    Like you say, if it come out the box as good as a Prosport but just had a bendy barrel (not as in Chinese made bendy barrels) and didn't need threatening with a load of delrin and extra cash, then I'd happily pay double the price of a 99 for it, as most 99 owners (and 95 come to think of it) will happily pay the same again to get it to shoot straight and look better.

    Pete
    Far too many rifles to list now, all mainly British but the odd pesky foreigner has snuck in

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •