Results 1 to 15 of 42

Thread: Why not gas-rams

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Holywell N.Wales
    Posts
    1,514
    It would seem that on the whole, people who have them like them and those who don't have one don't ?
    Many parallels with those who prefer springers to pre charge maybe ?
    Horses for courses eh.
    Rust never sleeps !

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Ashby-de-la-Zouch
    Posts
    939
    I'm still planning on some HFT once I find the right HW90 to use. Not to replace my tx200, just to compare. Looking forward to trying it though

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Plant City FL, 22 miles east of Tampa
    Posts
    1,453
    Quote Originally Posted by El Garro View Post
    It would seem that on the whole, people who have them like them and those who don't have one don't ?
    Many parallels with those who prefer springers to pre charge maybe ?
    Horses for courses eh.
    Have tried them and don't like the shot cycle. I think the parallel is more like a very expensive car, no one will admit the problems they have with what they payed so much for.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    East Sussex, Nr Rye
    Posts
    17,280
    i've never had to change a spring in any of my gasrams. Nor forked out hundreds to make then a better mousetrap. In fact I never had to do anything with them other than just shoot; always been trouble free.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Newcastle-under-Lyme
    Posts
    3,636
    I had the thumbhole Olympus.

    Blueing was superb. Woodwork was really nice. Engineering impressed.

    Trigger wasn't great. Shot cycle harsh.

    I was living with all that.

    I mainly shoot in Winters. On cold days the MV was dying shot per shot and so was the POI. Couldn't live with that so I sold it. Wish I'd kept it and used it in warm weather. It went to Holland I think.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    N Ireland
    Posts
    182
    I have had several Theobens including an FAC Sirocco Classic and an Eliminator which I ran at 24 ft lbs. Superb air weapons in terms of build quality and finish with the exception of the triggers which let the guns down. I really don't get what people are saying about them being difficult to shoot compared to springers, I found the opposite. The short and quick lock time in my opinion made them easier to shoot extremely accurately when you found the right pellet. And whoever mentioned their experience with their receptionist that was my experience too LOL!!!

    Trig
    What goes around comes around. So it's in all our interests to be nice!!!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Clacton on Sea
    Posts
    183
    Anyone tried a Sig ASP 20 ? I think there was one at the Birmingham Shooting Show but the queue looked quite large so I kept walking

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Bruton
    Posts
    6,595
    Quote Originally Posted by Carl2 View Post
    Anyone tried a Sig ASP 20 ? I think there was one at the Birmingham Shooting Show but the queue looked quite large so I kept walking
    On a similar note, has anyone tried a Diana 340 or 350 N-Tec?

    Reviews I've seen from people I mostly trust suggest:

    - barrel droop;
    - potential scope creep;
    - snappy;
    - very light trigger;
    - best groups of around 10-15mm at 25/30 yards/metres. Even at 18 ft-lbs in .177".

    Which, trigger and droop aside, is very Theoben-y. And interesting. If I was in the market for a new break-barrel, I'd definitely check it out. Even though the stocks look silly (but hey, maybe they handle well?).

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •