Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Hawke Panorama old and newer scope differences?

  1. #1
    look no hands's Avatar
    look no hands is offline Even better looking than a HW35
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Coventry, even closer to Tony L.
    Posts
    12,043

    Hawke Panorama old and newer scope differences?

    Hi all,

    Just in the process of doing a scope swap and have a Hawke Panorama on it's way, it's an earlier model and checking out Googled images, I've noticed the newer ones are different, are the older ones any better lense or build quality wise or is it just cosmetic?

    Cheers

    Pete
    Far too many rifles to list now, all mainly British but the odd pesky foreigner has snuck in

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    bideford
    Posts
    2,916
    Recently changed over to Panoramas on my rifles. They're the 2-7x32 15100.

    They are superb glass
    B.A.S.C. member

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Northop Hall Flintshire North Wales
    Posts
    1,421
    found the older Panorama scopes have a better build quality than the new ones,sold an 4-12x50ev only to regret it later tried the new one ,ended up buying an old one in 4-12x50 AO with map6 the new one did,nt tick my box,s
    HW 97k s/s laminated stock.Hw 98k cs500 stock,CZ 457 varmint.Tika T3x Super Varmint 223 rem. an HW95k having sneaked back in Browning 725 12g sporter, pair of 525 sporters,SX3 Red Performance

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Ulrome Driffield
    Posts
    1,727
    Quote Originally Posted by robs5230 View Post
    Recently changed over to Panoramas on my rifles. They're the 2-7x32 15100.

    They are superb glass
    Second that, I have one and with it being 32mm parallax shift is no big deal if your'e carefull with eye placement / alignment. But, they are now out of production sadly.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Exeter
    Posts
    35,743
    Quote Originally Posted by robs5230 View Post
    Recently changed over to Panoramas on my rifles. They're the 2-7x32 15100.

    They are superb glass
    That's no longer listed on the web site the only 2-7x32 is the Airmax 13100.

    Comparing the numbers from a 2013 product book;
    the old model had a wider FOV at 3x, slightly shorter eye relief, fractionally shorter overall & a bit lighter,
    otoh the new 50mm now focuses down to 10yds rather than the old 15yds & has a slightly wider FOV at 12x,
    neither 5-15x50 or 6-18x50 existed in 2013.

    I've never used a Panorama, but I don't rate the current Sidewinder glass as good as it was in previous models.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Ulrome Driffield
    Posts
    1,727
    Quote Originally Posted by angrybear View Post
    That's no longer listed on the web site the only 2-7x32 is the Airmax 13100.
    As I understand things;

    The 1" Airmax and the Panorama AO's are the same scopes other than different reticles and also IR on the Panorama, there was never a x32 AO in the Panorama range I believe. That said, I wonder it there would have been a market for such?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    Ross
    Posts
    1,160
    No experience of this, but from what I've read the new Panoramas aren't springer friendly. The old ones were happy mounted on anything.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Accrington
    Posts
    3,585
    Don't know about quality but the newer panoramas seem more expensive. I have several early models which are excellent, also newer air max which are also excellent but without the ir can be hard to see reticle on dark targets.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •