Results 1 to 15 of 32

Thread: HW98 or 99

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Near Wimbledon, SW London, or Lusaka, Zambia
    Posts
    26,475
    if you don't want the weight of the TX, you defo don't want a stupidly front heavy 98 with that drainpipe on the front...

    Walnut stocked TX200 HC is suprisingly light and well balanced..
    Always looking for any cheap, interesting, knackered "project" guns. Thanks, JB.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Lincoln
    Posts
    807
    Now you mention it, I had a few shots a year or so ago with someones TX200hc & I don't remember it being ridiculously heavy, extremely accurate too.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    worthing
    Posts
    3,333
    Two very different rifles, Neil. If you like the 99s, go for another...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Lincoln
    Posts
    807
    I love the 99s, my problem is I always think I might like something else even more!
    My 30s & 99s are my favorite rifles, that's why I'm wondering if a 57 might be a good buy? It's basically an underlever version of the 99 right?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Liverpool
    Posts
    225
    Quote Originally Posted by NeilnrLincoln View Post
    I love the 99s, my problem is I always think I might like something else even more!
    My 30s & 99s are my favorite rifles, that's why I'm wondering if a 57 might be a good buy? It's basically an underlever version of the 99 right?
    Tbh id try the HW80 mate. As stated above the 98 is a heavy bugger and not much difference to a 99 sort from price. The 57 gets alot of bad press but I can't comment as I've never fired one

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    nr burnley ,lancashire
    Posts
    1,643
    the 95 bit bigger than the 99 ,comes with a mod very nice checking excellent gun about 320 ish price

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Location
    Sheffield
    Posts
    44
    99 is brilliant and light, but for longer range accuracy I would go with the 98. 99 has a tendency to eat it's own piston too

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    bideford
    Posts
    2,917
    The 98 is way heavier than the 99.
    If you're happy with the 99 get another. If you're happy with the 99, then no its not worth the extra money at all.

    An inbetweener would be the HW95. Same action as the 98 so essentially the same rifle without the window dressing and weight penalty.

    The 57's a handy little rifle. Similar cocking linkage to the 99 with similar issues relating to that.
    The marmite issue is down to the pop up breech. Earlier ones with plastic breech blocks had issues. Later ones are metal. Its just down to whether you find the pop up breech ok. Personally I liked it.
    Thin barrel and can be noisy when running on song as they have a fair crack especially in .177. Ugly front sight unit is probably its worst feature. If they made the forend like a 97 I have one again.
    B.A.S.C. member

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Newquay
    Posts
    517
    Quote Originally Posted by Rincewind666 View Post
    Tbh id try the HW80 mate. As stated above the 98 is a heavy bugger and not much difference to a 99 sort from price. The 57 gets alot of bad press but I can't comment as I've never fired one
    verything

    It could not be more different that the 99. stick wiyh the 99 it can do everything that the 80 can do except reach fac levels hence the problem with the 80 at sub 12ft lbs.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •