Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 32

Thread: Its NOT C.O.AL. it is....

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    8,331

    Its NOT C.O.AL. it is....

    C.O.L. CARTRIDGE OVERALL LENGTH. Overall is one word.

    I know I'm being picky but incorrect terminology has a habit of being picked up and used too often.

    Bullet heads, are bullets.
    Recoil shield is the breech face,

    I can't think any others at the moment!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    SW Birmingham (Rubery Rednal)
    Posts
    1,670
    May I venture to add "muzzle brake" (NOT "break"), and "coup de grace" (NOT "coup de gras")?

  3. #3
    Turnup's Avatar
    Turnup is offline Dialling code‎: ‎01344
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Crowthorne
    Posts
    5,491
    ft/lbs when meaning ft-lbs (admittedly I see it used less often since a certain airgun magazine mended it's ways)
    True freedom includes the freedom to make mistakes or do foolish things and bear the consequences.
    TANSTAAFL

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Devizes
    Posts
    5,031
    Quote Originally Posted by enfield2band View Post
    C.O.L. CARTRIDGE OVERALL LENGTH. Overall is one word.

    I know I'm being picky but incorrect terminology has a habit of being picked up and used too often.

    Bullet heads, are bullets.
    Recoil shield is the breech face,

    I can't think any others at the moment!

    Best email trump and let him know it should be USOA!

    Anyhoo I'm off to order some heads, I need to get some loading done
    Thanks for looking

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Hertford
    Posts
    1,519
    Quote Originally Posted by Turnup View Post
    ft/lbs when meaning ft-lbs (admittedly I see it used less often since a certain airgun magazine mended it's ways)
    Technically speaking, seeing as we are being pedantic, it is ft.lb (sometimes ft.lbs or ft.lbf), not ft/lbs or ft-lbs (or even ft/lbf or ft-lbf) and never in this context lbf.ft
    Good deals with: Muskett, Dreben, roger.kerry, TALL, Helidave1, Chelseablue, Leeroy7031, Mousemann, pnuk, Practical, NEWFI, HOOGS, Webb22, lazybones1416 and deanw5262 among others. Thanks Guys.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Buckley, Flintshire.
    Posts
    1,075
    C.G.A.F
    Personally, I couldn't give one.... I'd rather be shooting!
    HuMa regulated S200 .22...
    Artemis PP800 .177...
    Weihrauch HW45 .177

  7. #7
    Turnup's Avatar
    Turnup is offline Dialling code‎: ‎01344
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Crowthorne
    Posts
    5,491
    Quote Originally Posted by sarge4318 View Post
    Technically speaking, seeing as we are being pedantic, it is ft.lb (sometimes ft.lbs or ft.lbf), not ft/lbs or ft-lbs (or even ft/lbf or ft-lbf) and never in this context lbf.ft
    Depends on which schools you went to. and I believe both are correct. The . and the - are interchangeable in this context and sometimes the - is preferable as in Newton-metre or kilowatt-hour. I think we are agreed that ft/lb is always wrong.
    True freedom includes the freedom to make mistakes or do foolish things and bear the consequences.
    TANSTAAFL

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Tenterden, Kent
    Posts
    1,024
    Quote Originally Posted by enfield2band View Post
    Recoil shield is the breech face,
    No, the recoil shield is the raised area of a revolver frame at the rear of the cylinder that prevents the cartridges in the cylinder from being dumped out of the chambers from the recoil of a round firing....

  9. #9
    Parabuteo is offline My Chrony has bought it a couple of times...
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Southampton
    Posts
    6,061
    FFS Really
    I'm a maggot in another life you know

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Aotearoa
    Posts
    1,811

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Huntingdon
    Posts
    9,253
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Gain View Post
    May I venture to add "muzzle brake" (NOT "break"), and "coup de grace" (NOT "coup de gras")?
    Ah, 'coup de grace', French for lawn mower. Also, 'apéritif' - a 'set of dentures', and finally 'pas de deux', 'father of twins'.

  12. #12
    Parabuteo is offline My Chrony has bought it a couple of times...
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Southampton
    Posts
    6,061
    It amazes me that you lot dont self anethatize...the winter evenings are just going to fly by
    I'm a maggot in another life you know

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Banbury, Oxon
    Posts
    2,995

    Thumbs up

    Quote Originally Posted by tacfoley View Post
    Ah, 'coup de grace', French for lawn mower. Also, 'apéritif' - a 'set of dentures', and finally 'pas de deux', 'father of twins'.
    That made me chuckle!

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Wandsworth, London
    Posts
    892
    I may aswell vent that I hate it when people talk about “kick back” in reference to recoil.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    23, Glen Close, Kirkdouglas, Dundee.
    Posts
    1,415
    Quote Originally Posted by sarge4318 View Post
    Technically speaking, seeing as we are being pedantic, it is ft.lb (sometimes ft.lbs or ft.lbf), not ft/lbs or ft-lbs (or even ft/lbf or ft-lbf) and never in this context lbf.ft
    Ah! but that depends on what you mean by pedantic
    Big Ears AKA BE.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •