Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Valuation sought - Original Model 52 Sidelever

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Doncaster
    Posts
    4,875

    Valuation sought - Original Model 52 Sidelever

    An old mate surprised me this afternoon by revealing that he'd had this stashed away for about 30 years and could only remember firing it once. It's a .22 with both Tasco and open sights. He's considering selling it and wonders what it might be worth. It's too modern for my reference books so I'm trying to help him on here. I'd describe it as mint.......

    I have never been able to post photos on here but will happily email them to anyone interested enough to ask by PM. It will probably be tomorrow afternoon before I send them as I'm off to bed for a 0145 start. If I've time then I'll fire photos off.

    Thanks in advance, Mick
    When guns are outlawed only outlaws will have guns .

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    693
    I cant say for certain but I have seen them listed for between £200 and £350. If it is as mint as you say, I guess you could be looking at £300 plus.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Quigley Hollow, Nuneaton
    Posts
    17,112
    Thought I'd just move this for a wider audience, Mick.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    leeds
    Posts
    574
    Theres a battered one for sale for £120 so sounds about right at £200 plus if the condition is good.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Cambridge
    Posts
    747
    I would agree £250-£300, but it should be noted that at 12ft/lbs they are very harsh shooters!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    bideford
    Posts
    2,917
    The age of the 52 would mean it has a T01 trigger unit which is not as good as a current T06.
    Though still a useable rifle, its technically not a classic.
    I'd say value would be less than an equivalent model with a T06 trigger so probably £200 tops. Not an easy rifle to sell at any price as its rather unsuited to sub12
    B.A.S.C. member

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Pontypridd South Wales uk
    Posts
    1,848
    Quote Originally Posted by Jenny Dipple View Post
    I would agree £250-£300, but it should be noted that at 12ft/lbs they are very harsh shooters!
    Hmmm. I have shot most springers from that period- either having owned them or having tried them as being owned by a mate and I have to say I would never ever have described them as very harsh shooters. Indeed the spring on my 88/89 (cant recall which) 52 Firebird is akin to the spring out a Bic biro.
    Nope there are other suspects I would put in front of a 52 in those stakes.
    Having a potential of 25ft llbs plus across the pond does mean its tickling along at 12ft llbs and maybe not hugely suited to that level. In the days when power was everything it was designed to match the HW80, and it was more than capable in that respect of smoking an 80.
    Dave

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Doncaster
    Posts
    4,875
    Quote Originally Posted by T 20 View Post
    Thought I'd just move this for a wider audience, Mick.
    Thank you. Much appreciated.

    I should have given the serial number: 960451.

    Perhaps someone will be able to date it?

    Thanks again, Mick
    When guns are outlawed only outlaws will have guns .

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Quigley Hollow, Nuneaton
    Posts
    17,112
    Quote Originally Posted by walnutfarmmick View Post

    I should have given the serial number: 960451.

    Perhaps someone will be able to date it?

    Thanks again, Mick

    If you look at the rear left hand side of the action between stock and scope rail, you should find the production date stamped there by the smallest stamps known to mankind, Mick.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •