Quickload?

[Artiglio]

If you enjoy playing with it and adjust the settings to suit your actual results ( temperature, powder burn rate, mv’s) and are happy to measure case volumes , oal length etc.
The results tend to be very accurate ( or at least have been for the combinations i’ve tested), to the extent that if you combine it with “ optimal barrel timing” , load development is shortened in terms of range time though you spend ages on a pc.
I get far more enjoyment tinkering on the range than sitting at a keyboard, so i don’t get the best from it.

In terms of value for money, as for many things , make use of all it offers then yes, if you’re onlygoing to tinker it’ll be disappointing.

[Parabuteo]

Yea...see....I hate load development.

I see it as a necessary PITA because I hand load and want the best from the rifle, within limits (Cheaper, more consistant, better accuracy within the realms of CSR so 1MOA is fine although I will take better if it happens) but I HATE it

My F class days did my head in