Results 1 to 15 of 29

Thread: Are tap loaders inheritently less efficient?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Hsing-ee's Avatar
    Hsing-ee is offline may also be employed in conjunction with a drawn reciprocation dingle arm, to reduce sinusoidal repleneration
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    18,272
    Most pawerful tap loaders - Airsporter S, BSF S55, Original Diana 50T01 ... when 'tuned' could do over 12 fpe - but not much, a couple of fpe at most.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Very southeast
    Posts
    44,233
    Out of interest I put my borescope in the barrel of .22 Tracker and must say the tap seems like a perfect fit when closed, I can't try the 177 as borescope won't fit the bore
    Baz
    ____________________________
    Accuracy is everything!

    http://www.wildcatrifles.co.uk/

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Preston
    Posts
    3,196
    I have added o rings to the tap of one of my airsporter's, wouldn't do more than 8ft lbs before but now have it at about 11. This is done with 2 grooves around the circumstance then joined up above and below the pellet hole on both sides. The o ring is squeezed into kind of a square shape, one around each end of the pellet hole. Has worked well so far. An nc machine could do a circular seal path in a production situation I'm sure. After that and alignment there is no reason why they can't be as efficient as anything else IMO.
    Plinkerer and Tinkerer

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •