Results 1 to 15 of 65

Thread: These new UKAHFT rules

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Barnsley
    Posts
    386
    Quote Originally Posted by simmmo View Post
    I think what a lot of people are missing is that HFT course setting is in itself a game of smoke and mirrors. 30mm especially as the no. allowed has been increased sub 40 is a great tool especially with reduced face plates. I have only set one course with 30mm out to 45yds and only one target. People missed it high go figure.

    Monkey
    I've seen plenty of 45y targets with loads of misses high, strange.

    30mm are great as they are usually uncommon (people prefer to stick 25mm out instead) and catch loads out as they are not used to them, going high.

    Course setting itself, especially for HFT, is hard to do right, it's easier just to throw targets out to get people to miss, especially since 25mm were put out to 40,

    That's why IMHO we need to make it appealing to bring targets in, not encourage more that's thrown out.
    Air Arms MPR + GINB FT1 + VIPER 10X44
    WALTHER LGU + VIPER 10X44

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Rotherham
    Posts
    1,128
    My opinion kill size/distance wise is keep it as it is or even better bring the 25mm's back in to 35yrd.

    Courses set out cleverly to the current UKAHFT rules rarely get cleared. Did any course get cleared in the UKAHFT series last year?

    There may be some clearances at club shoot level but this could easily be due to lack of course options. For example, some clubs have limited land and so it can be easy for some to become very familiar with courses there. Or it could be the course was made tame as strong winds were expected that did not materialise. Or it could be the course setters had been on a bender the night before setting a course and just couldn't be arsed!

    As for up the peg shots - I can see the need for that if children and those of a slight build are struggling and therefore been put at a dis-advantage.

    At the end of the day the sport needs to encourage new participants which is going to be much harder if we make things harder in an attempt to stop the small percentage of elite shooters clearing courses.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Chichester
    Posts
    1,191

    Moving the dificulty

    In my opinion (as a relative novice) if the management need to make the courses more difficult I think it should be weighted at the shorter ranges, it feels that recently everything is just getting smaller and further.

    I am all for 15mm from 8 yards, as Simmo says its a game of finding your best compromise and we have enough long difficulty.

    As for the short 15mm being all shot up if there are several across the course that evens the chances of getting onto one early, and if you shoot a series/league it should even out with time.

    What about the typical scenario of a morning shoot with a sheltered wooded area and an open field area, as the wind generally picks up throughout the morning there is a distinct advantage to starting in the field, again this should even its self out over a a series?

    I think there is a positive for course setters in having more small long shots - they are easier to set than that elevated, short, dark through a tiny gap mini kill
    ..."My son," said the Norman Baron...."The Saxon is not like us Normans. His manners are not so polite. But he never means anything serious till he talks about justice and right"...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Buxted County HFT Republic of Crowzilla Sussex
    Posts
    4,295
    I see making the courses shorter using the currrent format
    as actually playing into the hands of the 40yd high mount brigade. They tell me they can poke everything from 17yds to 45yds (unless you are Larkin). They therefore practice the short ones. They say they have to get the yardage bob on for the short 15mm. I think giving them an extra two or three yards to worry about may be the way forward especially as Mark suggested upping the no. allowed to 8 from 6. At the moment I am setting courses to catch people out with wind as some people are shooting not needing to rangefind the bulk of the targets currently encountered. That's why I like the option of 30mm to 45yds. I think it is becoming purely a wind game and agree with Lol where you start on the day re wind encountered has a massive input on your score. Shortening courses would possibly help balance this a bit as well

    Monkey
    Buxted HFT Garage Guns are Us. Home of Crowzilla Doppers doughnut corner and SiHFT winners 2007 2008 2009 2010 2017 2018 2019.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Basildon
    Posts
    217

    My two pence

    Really interesting thread this one. Loads of great ideas. My two pence worth.... add 2 more positionals and take the supported 25mm out to 35 yards.
    Air Arms MPR, GINB stock,MTC Mamba Lite scope

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Bishops Stortford
    Posts
    103
    Quote Originally Posted by shaun eustace View Post
    Really interesting thread this one. Loads of great ideas. My two pence worth.... add 2 more positionals and take the supported 25mm out to 35 yards.
    Or better still, just double the number of postionals from 6 to 12 and stop fiddling with the rules every year!
    .22 Winner 2014 World HFT Championships (S400)
    Recoiling Winner 2017 World HFT Campionships (HW97k)
    HFT England team 2018, 2019, 2020 (Rhino enhanced HFT500)

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Rotherham
    Posts
    1,128
    I have already given my opinion that things could simply be left as they are but I am curious as to why it is felt by some that courses need to be made more difficult?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •