Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 36

Thread: Why are springer repeaters not more popular these days ?

  1. #1
    Barryg's Avatar
    Barryg is offline Registered ̶D̶i̶a̶n̶a̶ User
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Nr. YEOVIL
    Posts
    5,058

    Why are springer repeaters not more popular these days ?

    I would have thought that with modern technology we could have something like a modern repeater P/S /Airsporter.

    There is not even a Diana repeater now.

    Just wondering why.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Truro
    Posts
    4,398
    Probably because multi-shot pre-charged rifles have become quite prevalent and offer more benefit in terms of ease of use.

    Also the currently available repeating spring / gas ram guns are shite.
    People who have been there focus on the fundamentals. People who sit at keyboards all day focus on the trivial and inane.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    641
    Quote Originally Posted by rockdrill View Post
    Probably because multi-shot pre-charged rifles have become quite prevalent and offer more benefit in terms of ease of use.
    Definitely this
    Quote Originally Posted by rockdrill View Post
    Also the currently available repeating spring / gas ram guns are shite.
    But this,,,, Nail, Head, Squarely Hit!!!



    Multishot is a smaller niche market within the already small niche market of Spring/ Gas Ram powered rifles I suppose,,,, (don't roast me, Im a springer shooter)
    And since the old Theoben SLR's I haven't really seen a nicely done repeater.

    The last repeater that caught my eye was the Gamo Maxxim and I think the design team were glue sniffers or something because that is one strange looking multishot system

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Rossendale, Lancashire
    Posts
    1,360
    Quote Originally Posted by Rob Anybody View Post

    And since the old Theoben SLR's I haven't really seen a nicely done repeater.
    Original BSA Goldstar?

    Cheers
    Greg

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    641
    Quote Originally Posted by Thegreg View Post
    Original BSA Goldstar?

    Cheers
    Greg
    Damn, I forgot about that one, good call
    Nice looking rifle,, Thanks Greg

  6. #6
    look no hands's Avatar
    look no hands is online now Even better looking than a HW35
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Coventry, even closer to Tony L.
    Posts
    12,064
    Quote Originally Posted by Thegreg View Post
    Original BSA Goldstar?

    Cheers
    Greg
    The rifle was fine, it was the mags that were shite.

    Pete
    Far too many rifles to list now, all mainly British but the odd pesky foreigner has snuck in

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    East Chinnock
    Posts
    650
    I've shot the gamo maxxim and I thought it pretty horrible - trigger not great and harsh shot cycle. Having said that the multishot function performed flawlessly...

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Bruton
    Posts
    6,593
    Quote Originally Posted by Rob Anybody View Post
    And since the old Theoben SLR's I haven't really seen a nicely done repeater.
    Diana 300R?

    https://www.pyramydair.com/blog/2011...rlever-part-2/

    Easy to break it, though, if you don’t treat it properly, as the article linked above shows. And, I think, only made in .177”.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Bruton
    Posts
    6,593
    Looking at reports from the SHOT show, both Crosman/Benjamin and Hatsan are bringing out new repeating break barrels along similar lines to the Gamo Maxxim.

    Not prejudging anything, but they both look like stupid useless nonsense. 😉

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Swansea
    Posts
    5,063
    Quote Originally Posted by Geezer View Post
    Diana 300R?

    https://www.pyramydair.com/blog/2011...rlever-part-2/

    Easy to break it, though, if you don’t treat it properly, as the article linked above shows. And, I think, only made in .177”.
    i had a diana 300r. found it very very front heavy and was a very long gun. the mag set up was far more robust than a goldstar but the fiddle of loading the mag then putting it in the holder and then loading it in to the gun is more time intrusive then the bsa mag set up. i have 3 goldstars at the moment and the goldstar is a far more balanced gun. the mags work ok if you use the slightly newer ones than the original ones. having had both i prefer the goldstar. id not buy another 300r thats for sure!

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    christchurch
    Posts
    7,131
    Quote Originally Posted by Frog View Post
    I've shot the gamo maxxim and I thought it pretty horrible - trigger not great and harsh shot cycle. Having said that the multishot function performed flawlessly...
    Ive got one in .22 and I agree that the multishot system deserves a better gun.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    ashington
    Posts
    348
    gimmicks!!, cheap and nasty pointless gimmicks , that's why

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Location
    Hull East Yorkshire
    Posts
    1,429
    I had a BSA Goldstar that was certainly not a gimmick.

  14. #14
    Hsing-ee's Avatar
    Hsing-ee is offline may also be employed in conjunction with a drawn reciprocation dingle arm, to reduce sinusoidal repleneration
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    18,244
    One of the attractions of a spring gun is its simplicity. Repeaters are more complex, uglier and you still have to cock the dang thing anyway, so you have to have it out of your shoulder in any case, not really any advantage to a nice simple single shot.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Ashby-de-la-Zouch
    Posts
    939
    Quote Originally Posted by Hsing-ee View Post
    One of the attractions of a spring gun is its simplicity. Repeaters are more complex, uglier and you still have to cock the dang thing anyway, so you have to have it out of your shoulder in any case, not really any advantage to a nice simple single shot.
    Nail, meet head.
    It needs taking out the shoulder and cocking still. With a pocket full of pellets its just as quick to use a break barrel.
    Ive got a 300r and a goldstar. Dont use either.

    If they put that design effort into a recoiless break barrel there would be something to be excited about

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •