Results 1 to 15 of 36

Thread: Why are springer repeaters not more popular these days ?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Barryg's Avatar
    Barryg is offline Registered ̶D̶i̶a̶n̶a̶ User
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Nr. YEOVIL
    Posts
    5,073

    Why are springer repeaters not more popular these days ?

    I would have thought that with modern technology we could have something like a modern repeater P/S /Airsporter.

    There is not even a Diana repeater now.

    Just wondering why.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Truro
    Posts
    4,398
    Probably because multi-shot pre-charged rifles have become quite prevalent and offer more benefit in terms of ease of use.

    Also the currently available repeating spring / gas ram guns are shite.
    People who have been there focus on the fundamentals. People who sit at keyboards all day focus on the trivial and inane.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    645
    Quote Originally Posted by rockdrill View Post
    Probably because multi-shot pre-charged rifles have become quite prevalent and offer more benefit in terms of ease of use.
    Definitely this
    Quote Originally Posted by rockdrill View Post
    Also the currently available repeating spring / gas ram guns are shite.
    But this,,,, Nail, Head, Squarely Hit!!!



    Multishot is a smaller niche market within the already small niche market of Spring/ Gas Ram powered rifles I suppose,,,, (don't roast me, Im a springer shooter)
    And since the old Theoben SLR's I haven't really seen a nicely done repeater.

    The last repeater that caught my eye was the Gamo Maxxim and I think the design team were glue sniffers or something because that is one strange looking multishot system

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Rossendale, Lancashire
    Posts
    1,360
    Quote Originally Posted by Rob Anybody View Post

    And since the old Theoben SLR's I haven't really seen a nicely done repeater.
    Original BSA Goldstar?

    Cheers
    Greg

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    645
    Quote Originally Posted by Thegreg View Post
    Original BSA Goldstar?

    Cheers
    Greg
    Damn, I forgot about that one, good call
    Nice looking rifle,, Thanks Greg

  6. #6
    look no hands's Avatar
    look no hands is offline Even better looking than a HW35
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Coventry, even closer to Tony L.
    Posts
    12,149
    Quote Originally Posted by Thegreg View Post
    Original BSA Goldstar?

    Cheers
    Greg
    The rifle was fine, it was the mags that were shite.

    Pete
    Far too many rifles to list now, all mainly British but the odd pesky foreigner has snuck in

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    East Chinnock
    Posts
    650
    I've shot the gamo maxxim and I thought it pretty horrible - trigger not great and harsh shot cycle. Having said that the multishot function performed flawlessly...

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Eastbourne, East Sussex
    Posts
    3,326
    Quote Originally Posted by look no hands View Post
    The rifle was fine, it was the mags that were shite.

    Pete
    Yeah right there, a right pain in the seating area.
    John Darling JD (1946-2004) was my inspiration to be the best i can and enjoy the sport i love. R.I.P
    A dedicated HW80 Fanatic and owner since 1986 to present.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Bruton
    Posts
    6,595
    Quote Originally Posted by Rob Anybody View Post
    And since the old Theoben SLR's I haven't really seen a nicely done repeater.
    Diana 300R?

    https://www.pyramydair.com/blog/2011...rlever-part-2/

    Easy to break it, though, if you don’t treat it properly, as the article linked above shows. And, I think, only made in .177”.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Bruton
    Posts
    6,595
    Looking at reports from the SHOT show, both Crosman/Benjamin and Hatsan are bringing out new repeating break barrels along similar lines to the Gamo Maxxim.

    Not prejudging anything, but they both look like stupid useless nonsense. 😉

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Swansea
    Posts
    5,070
    Quote Originally Posted by Geezer View Post
    Diana 300R?

    https://www.pyramydair.com/blog/2011...rlever-part-2/

    Easy to break it, though, if you don’t treat it properly, as the article linked above shows. And, I think, only made in .177”.
    i had a diana 300r. found it very very front heavy and was a very long gun. the mag set up was far more robust than a goldstar but the fiddle of loading the mag then putting it in the holder and then loading it in to the gun is more time intrusive then the bsa mag set up. i have 3 goldstars at the moment and the goldstar is a far more balanced gun. the mags work ok if you use the slightly newer ones than the original ones. having had both i prefer the goldstar. id not buy another 300r thats for sure!

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Yeovil/Moreton in Marsh
    Posts
    12,908
    Quote Originally Posted by Barryg View Post
    I would have thought that with modern technology we could have something like a modern repeater P/S /Airsporter.

    There is not even a Diana repeater now.

    Just wondering why.
    2 reasons as i see it. Manufacturers dontvsee a viable market andvwhats the advantage....you still have to break position and make big movements.
    The other...PCPs do multi shot a thousand times better than any springer has or could.
    In a battle of wits I refuse to engage with an unarmed person.
    To one shot one kill, you need to seek the S. Kill only comes from Skill

  13. #13
    Barryg's Avatar
    Barryg is offline Registered ̶D̶i̶a̶n̶a̶ User
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Nr. YEOVIL
    Posts
    5,073
    Quote Originally Posted by Steyr View Post
    2 reasons as i see it. Manufacturers dontvsee a viable market andvwhats the advantage....you still have to break position and make big movements.
    The other...PCPs do multi shot a thousand times better than any springer has or could.

    I don't think that AA manufactured the Prosport for its practicality when they already had the TX

    In the same way a nicely engineered repeating Prosport with a improved cocking lever might appeal to those liking a no nonsense self contained attractive airgun, something that might be a thousand times better than any PCP

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Ashby-de-la-Zouch
    Posts
    939
    How about a modern take on the browning airstar.
    Brushless motor, modern batteries. Stick it on a sledge system and add an electrically cycled magazine.

    Possibly the best a repeating springer could be. But still heavier and more expensive than an s410

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •