W. H. B. Smith & his argument for the superiority of CO2 rifles

[cringe]

Hence the latest .68 bore Umarex T4E HDS 68.


Baz

To 45flint I apologise if I am interfering with your thread, and I am looking forward to your reviews [re spring verses co2].
this for attention of Baz, I googled that Umarex blar blar ! pistol and I am gob smacked! is that legal? it looks like a sawn of shotgun! they are promoting this as a weapon for self/home defence! I thought pistols were limited to 6ft/pounds in UK?
perhaps I spent too much of my time in the 1970's
kind regards Al

[45flint]

To 45flint I apologise if I am interfering with your thread, and I am looking forward to your reviews [re spring verses co2].
this for attention of Baz, I googled that Umarex blar blar ! pistol and I am gob smacked! is that legal? it looks like a sawn of shotgun! they are promoting this as a weapon for self/home defence! I thought pistols were limited to 6ft/pounds in UK?
perhaps I spent too much of my time in the 1970's
kind regards Al

I am fascinated by that sawn off shotgun. All good. Not sure my review will be much of one, lol. The biggest difference so far is the Mark 3 is almost silent and the 160 has such a crack that I really can’t risk shooting it much in the back yard. You can drum down the power on the 400 to back yard friendly but your plinking not hunting. But a 10 round mag makes it a lot of fun.

All three are more accurate than I am. Put the three on the table and have to choose which one to take home? I’m grabbing the Mark 3.