Both, and here's the rationale.
You see all this pellet testing in the magazines with 6 inches of clean putty / gel telling us that .177 leaves as big a channel as .22 but I'm yet to find a pigeon with a 6 inch deep head or a furless, bald rabbit.
What would you rather - Be shot through the head with a golf ball or a cricket ball? Answer: neither because either way you would be stone dead.
So back to the point - for 12 ft lb and for fixed, known, short ranges such as barn, feeder, rat shooting .177 provides no advantage over .22 as I zero at 25 yards so I use .22 and I find the .22 has a slight advantage in pinning quarry down (particularly pigeons).
For variable, estimated, medium ranges such as field work, woods, stalking and particularly night shooting the flatter .177 provides a significant advantage in accurate shooting and with a 35 yards zero mirrors the .22 aim points between primary and secondary zeros.
In my tool box I have a claw hammer and a lump hammer. I use either for different jobs. Same is true of my rifles and calibre. The more important point is accurate shot placement which has more to do with shooter skill, range estimation and trigger quality these days than calibre. The calibre only helps in these areas.
Last edited by Simply Simon; 17-05-2019 at 07:27 PM.
Good Deals with: Gazza, Fred, muts65, Brian747, wombat100, Tweaky (BSAOG), the wizard, delboy, craigy, skygrowler, JTH71, pgm112, Doger21, shootingmad, PHOBUS, bhill22, pmcb, pablo19, BobSki, Petay, Double Tap, Geoff555, Wild dogman, Multijet, BANANAMAN, RapidNick