Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456
Results 76 to 80 of 80

Thread: Which calibre do you use for hunting

  1. #76
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Radstock, Somerset, cider country. ...
    Posts
    21,056
    Quote Originally Posted by Rustam Bana View Post
    From the H&N website.

    Zero range is 22 yards and sight height is 1.5" for both calibres.

    [IMG][/IMG]
    .177" cal. H&N FTT at 12 ft.lbs.


    [IMG][/IMG]
    .22" cal. H&N FTT at 20 ft.lbs.

    The trajectories look fairly similar to me for the usual airgun ranges.
    Except that for FAC hunting and the ranges involved, the zero range is unlikely to be 22 yards. That range proves the similarity of the two trajectories, sure, but I took Muskett's question to be asking what will give the flattest trajectory at FAC ranges. Most FAC airguns in .22 calibre are set (at factory level anyway) closer to the 30 ft lb mark than 20. Unless the rifle in question has only a small reservoir.
    "Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life son" Dean Wormer.

  2. #77
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    takeley /Bishops Stortford Herts
    Posts
    6,726
    Quote Originally Posted by knightrider View Post
    This is not a calibre debate...I’m just interested to see which calibre you use for hunting
    TBH, I hunt with all calibres from .177 , .20, .25, .303
    and all types of guns, my most used airgun is my daystate huntsman in .20
    I enjoy them all .
    atb brian

  3. #78
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    plainville
    Posts
    48
    Started w/.177 Years ago in FAC but switched to the Mighty .22 because of Pass through's and Runner's Shooting Gray Squirrel's using .177 w/light or heavy Pellets don't mater, .177 not up for the Job of Killing Gray's Cleanly w/Body Shots.....Franky

  4. #79
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Devizes
    Posts
    5,032
    .22 at 32 ft-lb
    Thanks for looking

  5. #80
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Nuneaton
    Posts
    636
    Both, and here's the rationale.

    You see all this pellet testing in the magazines with 6 inches of clean putty / gel telling us that .177 leaves as big a channel as .22 but I'm yet to find a pigeon with a 6 inch deep head or a furless, bald rabbit.

    What would you rather - Be shot through the head with a golf ball or a cricket ball? Answer: neither because either way you would be stone dead.

    So back to the point - for 12 ft lb and for fixed, known, short ranges such as barn, feeder, rat shooting .177 provides no advantage over .22 as I zero at 25 yards so I use .22 and I find the .22 has a slight advantage in pinning quarry down (particularly pigeons).

    For variable, estimated, medium ranges such as field work, woods, stalking and particularly night shooting the flatter .177 provides a significant advantage in accurate shooting and with a 35 yards zero mirrors the .22 aim points between primary and secondary zeros.

    In my tool box I have a claw hammer and a lump hammer. I use either for different jobs. Same is true of my rifles and calibre. The more important point is accurate shot placement which has more to do with shooter skill, range estimation and trigger quality these days than calibre. The calibre only helps in these areas.
    Last edited by Simply Simon; 17-05-2019 at 07:27 PM.
    Good Deals with: Gazza, Fred, muts65, Brian747, wombat100, Tweaky (BSAOG), the wizard, delboy, craigy, skygrowler, JTH71, pgm112, Doger21, shootingmad, PHOBUS, bhill22, pmcb, pablo19, BobSki, Petay, Double Tap, Geoff555, Wild dogman, Multijet, BANANAMAN, RapidNick

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •