Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 32

Thread: .177 vs .22

  1. #16
    harvey_s's Avatar
    harvey_s is offline Lost love child of David Niven and Victoria Beckham
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Norwich
    Posts
    9,328
    If I had to guess I'd suggest that gun sales fall into two catergories...

    a) Those who hunt
    and
    B) Those that don't

    Of category A there will be percentage who prefer the larger calibre for percieved 'knockdown power' ignoring any argumnet over whether that persons belief is right or wrong.

    Of category B these people tend to shoot more at iether fixed or more known/predictable distances and then .177's flatter trajectory matters far less and springers in particular are usually much 'nicer' to shoot.

    All of which limits the appeal of the 'boys' calibre and tip the odds in favour of 'mans' pellet...

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Radstock, Somerset, cider country. ...
    Posts
    21,053
    Quote Originally Posted by knighty View Post
    you need to be a good shot to use .177 the .22 is more forgiving,
    I think most airgun shooters would argue the opposite ...
    "Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life son" Dean Wormer.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    East Chinnock
    Posts
    650
    Quote Originally Posted by harvey_s View Post
    Worst argument ever.... given that that .22 pellets are 100% heavier, but .177 pellets only net a 30% saving at the top end.
    Budget brands only net a 15% saving.

    The .177's are going to have the better margin by far...
    Not so sure of that - I would guess that cost of lead is not the major component in pellet prices. Certainly .22 pellets will cost more to transport.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Location
    London
    Posts
    13
    Very interesting thread. I noticed this when looking for preowned pcps (s410). Almost everything was .22. it seems there has been a shift away from .177 which is a shame. Yep people think .22 is better for hunting but if you're accurate and shooting within your range anything within the head will knock the quarry down. I'd always hunt for headshots and anything where this isn't possible is a no no for me (just a personal thing, not claiming to be right).

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Hull
    Posts
    2,376
    I suspect that the explanation for the predominance of used .22 rifles is quite simply that the majority of "casual" (rather than informed forum members) airgun buyers - probably buying for mainly plinking and garden pest control - think that .22 is more "powerful" on the bigger is best basis. The majority probably didn't or don't understand the flatter trajectory benefits of .177. I daresay that the majority of airguns on the second hand market are also springers for similar reasons. I don't think that much has changed in the last ten years of so from my early efforts to find a secondhand .177 PCP maybe 10 years ago - there were much fewer of the smaller calibre available then too.

    The smoother shooting characteristics of .22 springers probably means that the buyers of .22 rifles for garden use may well have made the best choice for their needs too.

  6. #21
    harvey_s's Avatar
    harvey_s is offline Lost love child of David Niven and Victoria Beckham
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Norwich
    Posts
    9,328
    Quote Originally Posted by Frog View Post
    Not so sure of that - I would guess that cost of lead is not the major component in pellet prices. Certainly .22 pellets will cost more to transport.
    Really? You think labour will be the major cost of something banged out by machine at thousands an hour...and then compare this with the price of lead.

  7. #22
    harvey_s's Avatar
    harvey_s is offline Lost love child of David Niven and Victoria Beckham
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Norwich
    Posts
    9,328
    Quote Originally Posted by Kes View Post
    I think most airgun shooters would argue the opposite ...
    Not necessarily...

    I can think of more than few agreeing with the previous statement & their argument will be Yes, .177 is more forgiving trajectory-wise - but an off target shot may often wound.
    But although a .22 is more demanding to range find - an off target shot will either result in a miss or a better chance of a kill than the smaller calibre.

    Don't ask me the merits of this, my experience with live quarry is limited and either did the job for me.

    BTW I mainly shoot targets these days and nearly all of my guns are .22 except for a HW98...I must be a masochist.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Swansea
    Posts
    5,062
    Quote Originally Posted by tinbum View Post
    Most airgun users are male with man sized fingers and use airguns over traditional airgun ranges, so .22 is the obvious choice.
    So tinners you have not jumped over the gay side of the fence and had .177?

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    571
    Quote Originally Posted by Bez_01 View Post
    Very interesting thread. I noticed this when looking for preowned pcps (s410). Almost everything was .22. it seems there has been a shift away from .177 which is a shame. Yep people think .22 is better for hunting but if you're accurate and shooting within your range anything within the head will knock the quarry down. I'd always hunt for headshots and anything where this isn't possible is a no no for me (just a personal thing, not claiming to be right).
    I think your looking at it the wrong way around, the reason everything you saw for sale was .22 is because they were selling their .22 to buy .177

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    preston
    Posts
    527

    .177 or.22

    I would say .177 is more popular as most people just shoot at a range and its easier to hit spinners etc with .177. Most people just want the easy option like every thing today.
    mk2 rapid.22

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Yeovil/Moreton in Marsh
    Posts
    12,907
    Quote Originally Posted by tinbum View Post
    Most airgun users are male with man sized fingers and use airguns over traditional airgun ranges, so .22 is the obvious choice.
    WHAT !!!!!Have you been sniffing glue 😎😎😎😆
    In a battle of wits I refuse to engage with an unarmed person.
    To one shot one kill, you need to seek the S. Kill only comes from Skill

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    East Sussex, Nr Rye
    Posts
    17,212
    The .22 brigade are still sniffing snuff

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Louth
    Posts
    1,563
    I've found that shops that cater more for shotgun and firearms users tend to stock more .22 air rifles and the more specialised air gun shops have more in .177. There's still a belief among the old guard that .22 is 'more powerful' whereas the more informed have a realistic balance of what's used.

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Radstock, Somerset, cider country. ...
    Posts
    21,053
    Quote Originally Posted by harvey_s View Post

    their argument will be Yes, .177 is more forgiving trajectory-wise -
    I know. That's why I said that most airgun shooters would argue the opposite when he posted this:

    you need to be a good shot to use .177 the .22 is more forgiving,
    "Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life son" Dean Wormer.

  15. #30
    harvey_s's Avatar
    harvey_s is offline Lost love child of David Niven and Victoria Beckham
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Norwich
    Posts
    9,328
    Quote Originally Posted by Kes View Post
    I know. That's why I said that most airgun shooters would argue the opposite when he posted this:
    I think most .22 shooters would disagree and I explained - my post you quoted was removed from it's context.
    I wasn't agreeing with you...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •