Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 31

Thread: Pro Sport pretty much a TX ?

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Location
    Northwich
    Posts
    382
    I had a walnut stocked ps in .177 that I really liked the look of
    I just couldn't get used to it, nothing wrong with it I just got spoiled using the tx I think
    Sold it in the end. I would like to try one again sometime in.22
    Martin

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    350
    I've had a TX for years and love it. I also love the look of the PS and have shot several of them that mates own(ed) and loved the way they shoot. I'd buy a PS in a heartbeat if it had a very nicely grained walnut stock and either a black anodised cocking lever or a nicely blued steel one. I'd find it hard to live with the silver anodised finish on this particular rifle.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Barnsley
    Posts
    9,847
    I have a full length tx200 in a walnut stock. Fully bumerified by nikelarse and owned by him. Also a polished tx200 HC, again fully bummerified in a warren edwards walnut stock. And a PS in a walnut stock which I got at a big discount because it's previous owner couldn't get on with it. I get on with it! If I'd have been him, I'd have percy veered for longer than a fortnight.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    sunderland
    Posts
    866
    nice looking rifle prosport,never shot one im sure it be very good but i dont like way it cocks ill stick to my tx200 brill rifle.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Near Wimbledon, SW London, or Lusaka, Zambia
    Posts
    26,429
    had a PS for a while, loverly gun, but couldn't compete with the TX, so sold it. Bough another more recently, still a loverly gun, still couldn't compete with a TX, so sold it to a mate.

    If you can handle the extra (forward) weight, most ppl prefer the TX. In Walnut the PS feels nice, looks nice, shoots, nice, but as it's just not as nice to use, and a bit muzzle floaty. A walnut HC isn't much heavier, but just feels better. All IMHO of course, all are excellent guns.
    Always looking for any cheap, interesting, knackered "project" guns. Thanks, JB.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    A-9063 MARIA SAAL
    Posts
    219
    IMHO there is another substantial difference between the innards.

    Contrary to the TX which is naked the compression tube of the PS is glided by buttons at the front and a synthetic bearing at the rear.

    PS

    Sorry - no picture of the rear.

    TX


  7. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Ashby-de-la-Zouch
    Posts
    939
    The PS comp tube is 'glided' because the cocking linkage puts a lot of side load onto the comp tube, and is only held on with an M5 screw. So it needs to be lower friction to reduce stress.

    It doesn't add anything to the firing cycle or shooting characteristics

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Near Wimbledon, SW London, or Lusaka, Zambia
    Posts
    26,429
    Quote Originally Posted by cooper_dan View Post
    The PS comp tube is 'glided' because the cocking linkage puts a lot of side load onto the comp tube, and is only held on with an M5 screw. So it needs to be lower friction to reduce stress.

    It doesn't add anything to the firing cycle or shooting characteristics
    exactly...
    Always looking for any cheap, interesting, knackered "project" guns. Thanks, JB.

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Folkestone
    Posts
    515
    I opted for the PS because I find it better balanced than the front heavy TX. I also prefer the automatic and invisible anti-bear trap mechanism of the PS to the manual and external TX version. All that said, I will probably end up with a TX at some point!

    I don’t find the PS any more hold sensitive than any other springers.

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Near Wimbledon, SW London, or Lusaka, Zambia
    Posts
    26,429
    Quote Originally Posted by Saxmaniac View Post
    I don’t find the PS any more hold sensitive than any other springers.
    it's not... but the TX is less...
    Always looking for any cheap, interesting, knackered "project" guns. Thanks, JB.

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Location
    Stockport
    Posts
    398
    It’s sounding like PS = Marmite, TX = Honey.

    Cocking lever on the PS doesn’t really bother me, one stroke load pellet and it’s almost self closing, silent and out of the way.

    The TX unclip , cock , load press side button , close and re- clip and it’s noisy to cock , click , click, click , ?

    And the HC lever looks really short for repetitive shooting , dunno .

    Because I really like the P/S ( can’t put the .177 down especially ) I’ll maybe really really like the TX .

    Think I’d deffo want .177 if I go , HC or standard .. not sure . Prefer my 77K to standard 77 so ?

    Need to get a look at the TX , or just jump in as normal .

  12. #27
    Barryg's Avatar
    Barryg is offline Registered ̶D̶i̶a̶n̶a̶ User
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Nr. YEOVIL
    Posts
    5,058
    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Zodiac View Post

    And the HC lever looks really short for repetitive shooting , dunno .
    I measured my cocking effort at 28 lb for 11 ft/lbs

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Near Wimbledon, SW London, or Lusaka, Zambia
    Posts
    26,429
    Quote Originally Posted by Barryg View Post
    I measured my cocking effort at 28 lb for 11 ft/lbs
    the geometry is much more efficient than a PS.

    You can only short stroke a PS a little (I like around 90mm) - if you get it down to 83-86 medium stroke (like a mk1/2 tx), cocking effort gets a bit high - as does the load on that little bolt.
    Always looking for any cheap, interesting, knackered "project" guns. Thanks, JB.

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Location
    Stockport
    Posts
    398
    Great days shooting at home today , empty house all afternoon.

    Put half a tin of JSB express 7.87 through my PS.

    And my M5 is looking great.

    It’s a shame Tarian Marks don’t do 5mm targets .

  15. #30
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Location
    Newburgh
    Posts
    91
    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Zodiac View Post
    A Hail Mary for each one you sold .

    Did you hope you’d find a nice light one if you kept buying them ?


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •