Difficult to tell as mine all preffered FTT's, but the Fenman, in my experience, has almost no hold sensitivity so I would expect it to group better in most hands
https://i.postimg.cc/65tsHvZT/Fenman-and-hw80k.jpg
Both .22 and testing same pellet AA field
I'll answer later.
Difficult to tell as mine all preffered FTT's, but the Fenman, in my experience, has almost no hold sensitivity so I would expect it to group better in most hands
could not say my self
The metal spring always trumps the rammer
My Fenman does tighter than both those. Its a .177
Only going from experience, my .22 Fenman could outshoot my .22 HW80 all day, every day. But here’s the rub, I sold the Fenman and kept the HW80, the Fenman was difficult to cock and the shot cycle just far too snappy
Whichever shot the group at the bull clearly likes them and is zeroed for them. The other rifle doesn't and isn't and should be fed a different diet!
Rich.
WANTED: Next weeks winning lottery numbers :-)
maybe irrelevant but what is the distance?
Who did you get to shoot them ?
Always looking for any cheap, interesting, knackered "project" guns. Thanks, JB.
Presumably the Fenman is the group in the bull.
The lower group has issues, suggesting there is something not quite right in the rifle/sight/pellet/user combination.
The Fenman shot the bull group. Distance was 17 yards rested. I shot both groups. No Bic biro was involved I found it quite remarkable the Fenman gave such group as said before, it's quite snappy, like a fire cracker going off in your hands.
I had a .177 Evolution. Tried to get along with the gun for many years, replaced seals, relubed, and tried several power levels.
But the weight, size, cocking stroke and slammy firing, plus its tendency to throw shots made me trade it for a close to mint late 80's HW85.
Which was a good trade in my opinion.
I’m surprised by some of the comments. My Fenman is 0.20 and, while it is quite ‘snappy’, it is insanely accurate. A lot of fun to shoot.