Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 48

Thread: Hard and Soft Pellets

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Worcester
    Posts
    22,208
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil Russell View Post
    Very interesting comments. Many years ago I used .177 Superdomes in my 77K and later, when I got a s/h S400 I switched to 8.4 AAF for both rifles. I found accuracy with both rifles to be very good. I did need a new zero for the 77k though.
    Sometime later I had a dodgy tin of AAF (well it seemed that way ... poor accuracy that was then corrected by opening a new tin) and moved on to JSB 8.4. I admit I have not trawled through several other pellet makes in search of anything better.
    But, to get to the point: the comments about soft and hard are very interesting but would it be possible to rank pellet makes in order of hardness? A few have been mentioned but the differentiation between hard and soft seems a bit subjective. Is there a definitive test that produces actual values e.g 1mm deformation at a force of X? A list of pellets according to hardness could be useful.
    Maybe it is a case of searching back through Jim's publications ... or even getting Gary Wain to compile a list?
    Cheers, Phil
    I have never directly tried to measure pellet hardness, Phil, but I did measure start pressures of JSB and other pellets, and the JSBs were all 200psi or less, the rest just under twice that (H&N FTT) or greater.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Cambridge UK
    Posts
    7,068
    So we have to start somewhere: Gleaned from this post

    HARD: wasp
    Silhouette
    Meisterkugeln
    R10
    H&N FTT
    Barracuda FT
    Cross Premier
    Hobby
    Superdome

    SOFT: AAF
    JSB


    The order of pellets in the list is not a measure of 'how hard' or 'how soft' so comments are welcome to fine tune the list or add new types. Indeed I always thought AAF were quite hard?

    Could it be tested? What if, a big 'if', say 10 pellets were melted into a cube or whatever and a known weight/pointy implement dropped onto/into the cube? The impression left could be measured for depth which would give a comparison between pellets but not a truly scientific measure.
    Or would the hardness change due to melting? I can't see why it would other than due to separation of the components ..

    Oh the things we do in Lockdown.
    Cheers, Phil
    Last edited by Phil Russell; 23-11-2020 at 03:01 PM. Reason: New Info

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Worcester
    Posts
    22,208
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil Russell View Post
    So we have to start somewhere: Gleaned from this post

    HARD: wasp
    Silhouette
    Meisterkugeln
    R10
    H&N FTT
    Barracuda FT
    Cross Premier

    SOFT: AAF
    JSB
    Hobby
    Superdome

    The order of pellets in the list is not a measure of 'how hard' or 'how soft' so comments are welcome to fine tune the list or add new types. Indeed I always thought AAF were quite hard?

    Could it be tested? What if, a big 'if', say 10 pellets were melted into a cube or whatever and a known weight/pointy implement dropped onto/into the cube? The impression left could be measured for depth which would give a comparison between pellets but not a truly scientific measure.
    Or would the hardness change due to melting? I can't see why it would other than due to separation of the components ..

    Oh the things we do in Lockdown.
    Cheers, Phil
    Hobby and Superdome are in the wrong list, Phil.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Cambridge UK
    Posts
    7,068
    Quote Originally Posted by BTDT View Post
    Hobby and Superdome are in the wrong list, Phil.
    Have put Hobby and Superdome in the Hard list. But this is only leaving 2 examples in the soft ....

    New idea for testing: Thin sheet of pellet material. Tube with a 1mm (?) punch in it, punch end at open end of tube. Tube has a threaded top end e.g. M6 with a screw through it to push punch down. Dial gauge on top of tube, small torque wrench on M6 screw. Record depth at which punch goes into the pellet material for a set torque.
    Oh the things we think of ... ... but I do not have a wrench. ... I have a 1/2" drive one from motor maintenance days but that is most likely too big.

    Cheers, Phil

  5. #20
    Murphy is offline Cooee! Chase me you naughty boys!
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Wigan
    Posts
    22,358
    Heavy prems where made out of some kind of stone lead!
    Master Debater

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Retford, Notts
    Posts
    34,748
    Quote Originally Posted by BTDT View Post
    Hobby and Superdome are in the wrong list, Phil.
    Yep.

    And, re measuring them, Phil, a much more fun way will be to shoot and retrieve the pellets. Short range with low to medium powered guns or long range with higher powered guns will be fine. The amount of deformation will give a good idea. I've found that pellets retrieved from a pellet trap are very malleable and give a good clue as to the hardness. Not definitive, of course, but certainly gives an idea.

    And you're very right, maybe Uncle Terry could entask Mr Wain to do some more measured testing?
    THE BOINGER BASH AT QUIGLEY HOLLOW. MAKING GREAT MEMORIES SINCE 15th JUNE, 2013.
    NEXT EVENT :- May 4/5, 2024.........BOING!!

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Cambridge UK
    Posts
    7,068
    Good idea. I have been toying with taking a pellet, standing it on its skirt and then dropping a weight on it. Measure the deformation. Might work. Might try it tomorrow.
    Cheers, Phil

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Retford, Notts
    Posts
    34,748
    Excellent idea, Mr Russell.

    I shall look forward to reading your observations.
    THE BOINGER BASH AT QUIGLEY HOLLOW. MAKING GREAT MEMORIES SINCE 15th JUNE, 2013.
    NEXT EVENT :- May 4/5, 2024.........BOING!!

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Worcester
    Posts
    22,208
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil Russell View Post
    Good idea. I have been toying with taking a pellet, standing it on its skirt and then dropping a weight on it. Measure the deformation. Might work. Might try it tomorrow.
    Cheers, Phil
    The problem is the very thin and fragile JSB pellet skirts, I'm afraid, Phil. The idea is to measure the lead rather than the design.

    I can't see an alternative to melting pellets down into a mould, sizing it precisely, then applying a force and measuring distortion.

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Cambridge UK
    Posts
    7,068
    Quote Originally Posted by BTDT View Post
    The problem is the very thin and fragile JSB pellet skirts, I'm afraid, Phil. The idea is to measure the lead rather than the design.

    I can't see an alternative to melting pellets down into a mould, sizing it precisely, then applying a force and measuring distortion.
    As Mainwaring would have said, 'I wondered who would spot that ...'.
    You are quite right. A similar criticism applies to using a rifle (sorry TonyL) in that the rifle power / pellet velocity becomes a variable. I wonder if this factor could be reduced by, in effect, squashing the head of the pellet so bypassing the skirt effect. The extra variability introduced might be far less. But for a definitive answer:
    I think I need to find some small moulds ...

    Cheers, Phil
    PS I have some oak strip. I wonder if that could be used ... easy to make a multiple mould.

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Yeovil/Moreton in Marsh
    Posts
    12,900
    There is a guage that measures how soft lead is. I prefer softer lead.
    Antimony is added to make lead harder among other things but in certain barrels it can lead to flyers as the barrel gets a skin after each shot that is then picked up by another pellet somewhere down the line. It tends to be a pedictable pattern as to when a flier appears but not always.

    IIRC JSB includes antimony in their production but the % may of course be tweaked depending on various factors.

    There is no need to use a phosphur bronze brush on airgun barrel. A brush like that is to deal with burnt powder residues and fouling from copper jacketed bullets. It does nothing apart from wreck probe o ring seals.

    Some barrels like to be clean. Some dirty. Do a 5 to 10 shot group and keep it to compare later at a distance that begins to challenge ypur group size but alloes you to be consistant in placement. Too close and you wont see the group change. Too far and your errors disguise the real grouping potential.

    Pull trough the barrel with .22 lr patches making sure NOT to touch the crown. The chordd can very easily damage the crown the most vital bit of a barrel.

    Usually, a barrel might need to lead up again. This might be 40 shots or so either way. Do another 10 and see if the group has tightened or loosened it will say if the barrel likes to be clean or run in with lead.

    Every 100 or 200, do another test string to see if its still tightening, staying the same or loosening again. You will work out how many shots you can get away with and how many shots you can shoot before another clean is necessary.
    In a battle of wits I refuse to engage with an unarmed person.
    To one shot one kill, you need to seek the S. Kill only comes from Skill

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Watford
    Posts
    1,472
    It's interesting reading these comments, but to be honest what difference does it really make.
    I use H&N's in all my Weihrauchs as the accuracy is brilliant, and I use JSB in my R10's for the same reason.

    If the rifles are grouping spot on with whatever pellet you use, then does it really matter if they are hard or soft.

    Maybe I am missing something from this thread, but I really don't get what the issue really is or why it matters.
    When ever I pellet test, I always put about ten through aiming at spinners or something, I then shoot two
    groups of five.

    I just thought the difference in the groups was the makers manufacturing rather than hard or soft lead. Am I
    understanding this better now.

    Ade
    Shooting Air Rifles is like being a pubic hair on a toilet seat.
    Eventually someone comes a long and P's you off.
    They usually have a PCP

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Retford, Notts
    Posts
    34,748
    Quote Originally Posted by Steyr View Post
    There is a guage that measures how soft lead is. I prefer softer lead.
    Antimony is added to make lead harder among other things but in certain barrels it can lead to flyers as the barrel gets a skin after each shot that is then picked up by another pellet somewhere down the line. It tends to be a pedictable pattern as to when a flier appears but not always.

    IIRC JSB includes antimony in their production but the % may of course be tweaked depending on various factors.

    There is no need to use a phosphur bronze brush on airgun barrel. A brush like that is to deal with burnt powder residues and fouling from copper jacketed bullets. It does nothing apart from wreck probe o ring seals.

    Some barrels like to be clean. Some dirty. Do a 5 to 10 shot group and keep it to compare later at a distance that begins to challenge ypur group size but alloes you to be consistant in placement. Too close and you wont see the group change. Too far and your errors disguise the real grouping potential.

    Pull trough the barrel with .22 lr patches making sure NOT to touch the crown. The chordd can very easily damage the crown the most vital bit of a barrel.

    Usually, a barrel might need to lead up again. This might be 40 shots or so either way. Do another 10 and see if the group has tightened or loosened it will say if the barrel likes to be clean or run in with lead.

    Every 100 or 200, do another test string to see if its still tightening, staying the same or loosening again. You will work out how many shots you can get away with and how many shots you can shoot before another clean is necessary.
    Excellent input. Thank you.
    THE BOINGER BASH AT QUIGLEY HOLLOW. MAKING GREAT MEMORIES SINCE 15th JUNE, 2013.
    NEXT EVENT :- May 4/5, 2024.........BOING!!

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Retford, Notts
    Posts
    34,748
    Quote Originally Posted by BTDT View Post
    Unless you give each pellet, especially softer ones, the opportunity to create its own leading from scratch, you'll never know whether you've found the most accurate pellet for your barrel.
    Quote Originally Posted by StellaArtois Sr View Post
    It's interesting reading these comments, but to be honest what difference does it really make.
    I use H&N's in all my Weihrauchs as the accuracy is brilliant, and I use JSB in my R10's for the same reason.

    If the rifles are grouping spot on with whatever pellet you use, then does it really matter if they are hard or soft.

    Maybe I am missing something from this thread, but I really don't get what the issue really is or why it matters.
    When ever I pellet test, I always put about ten through aiming at spinners or something, I then shoot two
    groups of five.

    I just thought the difference in the groups was the makers manufacturing rather than hard or soft lead. Am I
    understanding this better now.

    Ade
    As per Jim's comment, sir.

    Like you, a few of my rifles seemingly prefer H&Ns, so I'll more than likely stick with them. At least for the time being.

    I have FAR too many, really. A few of my "plinkers" get fed RWS Hobby. Including a very tatty looking Supersport. It may get used as a ratter one day and, as it will one-hole all day long at up to around 20 yards or so, I'll probably never look beyond the Hobby for that rifle.
    THE BOINGER BASH AT QUIGLEY HOLLOW. MAKING GREAT MEMORIES SINCE 15th JUNE, 2013.
    NEXT EVENT :- May 4/5, 2024.........BOING!!

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Cambridge UK
    Posts
    7,068
    Quote Originally Posted by StellaArtois Sr View Post
    It's interesting reading these comments, but to be honest what difference does it really make.


    Ade
    To me I guess very little. But it stimulated curiosity as to which pellet was in which class. Musing on topics like this just keeps the little grey cells working.
    Cheers, Phil

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •