There's quite a lot wrong with the 95 out of the box.

The factory setup is pretty poor. They've just bunged a spring in with the hope of it being safe at sub12 (once the factory lube has burned off). But before the lube has all been combusted, the efficiency of the factory seal will have reduced, by it being hardened by the combustion.
Inefficient seal - harsh shot cycle. Thats if the seal hasn't already been compromised on assembly, by being rammed past the razor sharp cutouts in the cylinder, by some bloke in the factory.

Barrel length - now 310mm. Supporting the now accepted fashion for silencers on springers, and also compromising efficiency, with the shorter barrel producing less power.
The 410 barrel with the muzzle weight, being more efficient can produce a far softer shot cycle.

Lots of methods have been commonly used and described on here to "tame" the 95. Most just masking symptoms and making them appear better.
Obviously a set of well fitting guides will reduce twang. Short stroking quickens the shot cycle by reducing the amount of air available to be compressed (at the expense of increased preload needed to make power back up, possibly increasing the harshness of the shot cycle).
Piston sleeves. Another way of reducing noise, often used to calm a badly fitted spring.
Over lubing. Slap it all over, and boy can it feel smooth. It will shake off, migrate to the compression chamber and start shagging the seal all over again, so back to point 1.

The factory swept volume. Not ideal, but no disaster by any means.

The factory plank. Slack rake of pistol grip compromises any kind of decent trigger control, from what is a very good trigger.
Crap comb height for scope use, just about tops the lot off.

So in summary, out of the box, you end up with a harsh, boingy item, thats ergonoically poor.

But its all sortable

https://flic.kr/p/2kvQ8Hk