Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 46 to 47 of 47

Thread: New gun day- early Diana 34....

  1. #46
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Bruton
    Posts
    6,595
    Quote Originally Posted by andrewM View Post
    Thank you for your reply Dave. I am better informed!

    In your later comments, you referred to barrel droop. Was this really a problem for Diana and HW? It is hard to believe that their barrels would be so soft that they would succumb to fatigue after repeated cocking. Is it possible to identify the years involved for both brands and was it in the odd example or was it widespread? Has it ceased today?

    More generally, if I was marketing a brand in a particular country, I would first see what the users and customers were saying. I would also see why the competition was or was not successful. In Diana's case, I would therefore take note of the criticism of the use of plastic, in particular. I would also be wary of any agent that was selling products that might compete with my own.

    As for the Diana 280, it competes against the HW99 but is, perhaps, a little more powerful. With better open sights and some good marketing, it might do considerably better. As for your 34, I will await with keen interest your accuracy tests.

    Rgds
    A
    Droop is not about soft barrels. It’s about manufacturing. Back when airguns were either fitted with open sights on the barrel, or diopters for 6 yd or 10M Match, it didn’t matter and so no one noticed or cared. It did matter using receiver-mounted scopes for FT or hunting.

    It’s often associated with break barrels. Ironically, the only rifles I have detected droop on were both fixed-barrels. A D52 and an HW77.

    On your other points, almost everyone used plastic or alloy where appropriate. When appropriate, it’s fine. From a functional point of view.

  2. #47
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Pulborough
    Posts
    997
    Quote Originally Posted by Geezer View Post
    Droop is not about soft barrels. It’s about manufacturing. Back when airguns were either fitted with open sights on the barrel, or diopters for 6 yd or 10M Match, it didn’t matter and so no one noticed or cared. It did matter using receiver-mounted scopes for FT or hunting.

    It’s often associated with break barrels. Ironically, the only rifles I have detected droop on were both fixed-barrels. A D52 and an HW77.

    On your other points, almost everyone used plastic or alloy where appropriate. When appropriate, it’s fine. From a functional point of view.

    Thank you Geezer. I do not understand. What exactly happens with barrel droop, in terms of manufacturing?

    Rgds
    A

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •