I would look through the Bushnell, then Vortex, then Zeiss Conquest lines.
You really need to know exactly what you want to achieve when going to even higher grades of scopes like Swaro and Zeiss Victory ranges. (Swaro has the best glass and builds lighter than Zeiss. The features on Swaro aren't ideal for target use; Zeiss do a little better. I do fancy a Swaro, a very specific one, for a Blaser though.)
I have kept a Zeiss Conquest HD5 because it is not big, has locking target turrets, and pretty bright. The only annoying thing is side parallax starts at 50m. This is important if you intend at some point to put a NV Add On, such as a WDV or Pard 007, behind the scope, as these require parallax under 50m, possibly as low as 20m. Many higher end scopes don't go down far enough. Its why I have several Bushnell Legend Ultras because they have this feature (no longer made but they should have something similar.)
1.5x is bayonet range low (Roe deer in the woods?). x6 on a .222Rem isn't going to do a Magpie at 300m which this cartridge can do. Now my gamedealer only wants head shot rabbits I use x10 and above mag on my .22LR and .17HMR. X6 is best for solid hit vermin control.
With so many models its hard to suggest anything much. Plus built in luck means one person has a great time and another a heap of grief, can't get on with it., both having the same scope.
Again match what you need from the scope, its real use not some "every feature fantasy" (which we all do.) Match its scale to the rifle too; sporting, culling, or battleship gun.