Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 61

Thread: Just been shooting my FAC Pro Elite...

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Near Wimbledon, SW London, or Lusaka, Zambia
    Posts
    26,425
    Quote Originally Posted by cooper_dan View Post
    The breech jaw/end plug and main cylinder need to be attached somehow, generally with the cylinder being female, and breech jaws/end plug being male. The length of TP can be dependent on what joining method is used (threaded/brazed etc).
    Also the longer it is, the less effect machining tolerances will have on the angle of the barrel relative to the action.
    Super short TP's are only really viable for sliding comp tube actions.

    Hw80 (12mm?) Is probably the shortest you could reasonably go. But maybe the pro elite designer favoured a longer port for an alignment or joining reason?
    you could however use a vulcan type arrangement, where the barrel protruced back from the block, and enters a keyway in the breech face, shortening the port, whilst still allowing for a decent cylinder > tube mating depth.

    Quote Originally Posted by TonyL View Post
    You working away at the moment?
    Yup
    Always looking for any cheap, interesting, knackered "project" guns. Thanks, JB.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Retford, Notts
    Posts
    35,036
    Bet it's just a tad warmer down there then, Jon.
    THE BOINGER BASH AT QUIGLEY HOLLOW. MAKING GREAT MEMORIES SINCE 15th JUNE, 2013.
    NEXT EVENT :- May 4/5, 2024.........BOING!!

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    gateshead
    Posts
    24,273
    very nice guns

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Plant City FL, 22 miles east of Tampa
    Posts
    1,453
    Had one in both calibers. They were 22 ft. lbs. in .22 and 20 ft. lbs. in .177. I sold them to fund TX200's when I got into FT heavy. I had $600 in the 2, both brand new, and I sold them for $1250. One had no stock and was bought as action only by a stock maker. He thought he was getting a .22, but it was the .177. I had a stock, so $200 was what I paid. I also had an early Beeman R1(HW80) at the time. The HW does not compare and feels flimsy and cheap next to the PE.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    pembury
    Posts
    740
    Quote Originally Posted by FPoole View Post
    Had one in both calibers. They were 22 ft. lbs. in .22 and 20 ft. lbs. in .177. I sold them to fund TX200's when I got into FT heavy. I had $600 in the 2, both brand new, and I sold them for $1250. One had no stock and was bought as action only by a stock maker. He thought he was getting a .22, but it was the .177. I had a stock, so $200 was what I paid. I also had an early Beeman R1(HW80) at the time. The HW does not compare and feels flimsy and cheap next to the PE.
    I totally agree with your comparison with the 80. The ProElite feels substantial and beautifully engineered, especially when closing the barrel ....however that shows in its weigh.
    Mine was rebuilt By the late Steve Pope (RIP) with a reduced cylinder of 25mm with a CZ Barrel in .177 flavour. It also has a .22 Barrel with matching spring to allow it to stay below 12fpe when the caliber is changed.
    Very Accurate and a pleasure to shoot and own.

    Cheers Steve

  6. #21
    Barryg's Avatar
    Barryg is offline Registered ̶D̶i̶a̶n̶a̶ User
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Nr. YEOVIL
    Posts
    5,058
    WHY was such a nice break barrel like the ProElite discontinued and sold of cheap in such a short time after two years development ?

    I have not heard a satisfying answer, its a real mystery as the 80 is such a success

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Near Wimbledon, SW London, or Lusaka, Zambia
    Posts
    26,425
    Quote Originally Posted by Barryg View Post
    WHY was such a nice break barrel like the ProElite discontinued and sold of cheap in such a short time after two years development ?

    I have not heard a satisfying answer, its a real mystery as the 80 is such a success
    whilst the 80 is definitely not optimal at 12 FP, the PE is much worse.
    THe PE does generate a fair bit more power than the 80 unrestricted, but 18-20 FP from an 80 is enough for most people.
    IIRC the PE cost a fair bit more than an 80 at the time ?

    So I guess it comes down to not enough of a power advantage to justify the extra expense (for most) - even though the quality is better, how many customers in this market would care ? Coupled with not very good at 12 FP...

    I think we sometimes forget, we relatively discerning folks on this BBS represent a tiny minority of global airgun sales.
    Always looking for any cheap, interesting, knackered "project" guns. Thanks, JB.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Chelmsford
    Posts
    6,406
    I had a very nice example running at 24ftlb, though the piston seal suctioned onto the base of the cylinder and popped off the piston at one point. Sold to Baz iirc as I needed a slot.
    "Shooters, regardless of their preferred quarry, enjoy their sport for its ability to transfer them from their day-to-day life into a world where they can lose themselves for a few hours". B Potts.

  9. #24
    Barryg's Avatar
    Barryg is offline Registered ̶D̶i̶a̶n̶a̶ User
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Nr. YEOVIL
    Posts
    5,058
    Quote Originally Posted by Shed tuner View Post
    whilst the 80 is definitely not optimal at 12 FP, the PE is much worse.
    THe PE does generate a fair bit more power than the 80 unrestricted, but 18-20 FP from an 80 is enough for most people.
    IIRC the PE cost a fair bit more than an 80 at the time ?

    So I guess it comes down to not enough of a power advantage to justify the extra expense (for most) - even though the quality is better, how many customers in this market would care ? Coupled with not very good at 12 FP...

    I think we sometimes forget, we relatively discerning folks on this BBS represent a tiny minority of global airgun sales.
    I have heard that explanation before but it still don't really make sense, Diana brought out the 350 and 460 after the PE and are still going strong, why did AA not give it more time instead of dropping them so quick and selling them off cheap, at the time I thought that they had a really big design fault but now owners are saying how fantastic they are, making me kick myself for not getting one at the time
    Surely it would have been better for AA to have made some adjustments rather than a dead loss
    Last edited by Barryg; 16-02-2021 at 12:17 PM.

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Maylandsea Chelmsford Essex
    Posts
    3,580
    I ordered a service kit for my. 22 P/E, direct from Air Arms a few years after they stopped making them.
    I asked the Lady on the phone why did they stop making the P/E?. She replied that they lost money on them and they were not cost effective.
    They where primarily set up for export.
    Les..

  11. #26
    Barryg's Avatar
    Barryg is offline Registered ̶D̶i̶a̶n̶a̶ User
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Nr. YEOVIL
    Posts
    5,058
    Quote Originally Posted by FPoole View Post
    I also had an early Beeman R1(HW80) at the time. The HW does not compare and feels flimsy and cheap next to the PE.
    LOL the HW80 Flimsy, I can agree that the AA bluing looks more expansive if if that is what you mean by cheap but just trying think where the 80 is flimsy next to the PE, it cant be the end block as that would be more robust if abused by over tightening a mount, that only leaves the breech area and I'm not sure how anyone could call that flimsy
    A nice custom 80 would compare with a PE but the PE already looks like a custom job and it's the only gun I still won't but only if I can find one that has not been messed with

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Location
    Barnsley
    Posts
    10

    Pro Elite.

    Never seen one. Always hear good things about them. Want one, but rare so don`t think I`l ever get one. Regards Ken.

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Near Wimbledon, SW London, or Lusaka, Zambia
    Posts
    26,425
    the PE breech block and jaws are very substantial.. I don't have an 80 to hand, but I'm pretty sure the PE setup is beefier. But there's really nothing wrong with the 80 - they are not flimsy, I agree - so the PE is probably over-engineered.
    Always looking for any cheap, interesting, knackered "project" guns. Thanks, JB.

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Maylandsea Chelmsford Essex
    Posts
    3,580
    After having a Hw80 and hw98 glided by V-Mach they also had the breech shims done as part of the conversion.A worth while upgrade.
    When having the same conversion on my P/e Steve pope said it was unnecessary for a breech shim modification due to the gun being so over engineered in that area.
    Les..

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    pembury
    Posts
    740
    Quote Originally Posted by les allam View Post
    After having a Hw80 and hw98 glided by V-Mach they also had the breech shims done as part of the conversion.A worth while upgrade.
    When having the same conversion on my P/e Steve pope said it was unnecessary for a breech shim modification due to the gun being so over engineered in that area.
    Les..
    Hi Les
    It already has substantial shims fitted....the breach, as you will know, closes like a safe door...
    Cheers Steve

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •