Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Slamming or bouncy

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Melton Mowbray
    Posts
    2,042

    Slamming or bouncy

    Dear all

    I did some power testing with light and heavy pellets on a couple of spring rifles. Both produced more power with lighter pellets.
    What should I be aiming for? Pun intended.

    Equal power with both heavy and light.
    Close on power but tending toward higher with light.

    Or am I completely barking up the wrong tree.
    Repariere nicht, was nicht kaputtist.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Retford, Notts
    Posts
    35,124
    I know others may tune with a more focused approach to this, Neil, but as long as I am happy with the power output overall and as long as the gun is safely under the limit with its most efficient pellet and I'm happy with the manners, it's job done for me.
    THE BOINGER BASH AT QUIGLEY HOLLOW. MAKING GREAT MEMORIES SINCE 15th JUNE, 2013.
    NEXT EVENT :- May 4/5, 2024.........BOING!!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Retford, Notts
    Posts
    35,124
    To qualify my previous post a little, so much depends on how much time you have and how much importance you place on the power output being similar with a wide range of pellets and differing weights. For those willing to experiment and devote the time, we're playing with factors like transfer port diameter, piston weight, piston momentum, spring rate / force / preload, piston seal fit etc. Is a rifle that is "balanced" to shoot different weight pellets at similar energy levels any better than one that doesn't? To my mind, no. There can only ever be one truly 100% perfect individual set-up between rifle and pellet and, to my mind, we accept the compromise when it comes to differing performance with different pellets. As I'm sure you do, I'd always put far more emphasis on accuracy.
    THE BOINGER BASH AT QUIGLEY HOLLOW. MAKING GREAT MEMORIES SINCE 15th JUNE, 2013.
    NEXT EVENT :- May 4/5, 2024.........BOING!!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Near Wimbledon, SW London, or Lusaka, Zambia
    Posts
    26,451
    pellets are very different to one another.. so many variables it may not be telling you anything. lead mix, hardness, skirt thickness, size, profile, starting pressures all vary and affect power.

    However, JSB 7.3, 7.9 and 8.44 are about as similar as you can possibly get, except for the weight variable.
    In larger bored .22s, RWS Hobby and Superdome are pretty similar too (we don't care about shape). JSB 13.43s and 15.9s grains are similarish, but the lighter pelles have much thinner skirts.

    So in short, unless the pellets are very similar in other aspects, there's too much variablity to draw any useful conclusions.
    Also, using pellets way out of the "envolope" for a 12 Fp springer, i.e. 10+ grain .177s or 18+ grain .22 is not useful. Stick with 7-9 and 12-16 respectively.

    OTOH, when they are similar, I find the data very insightful...
    Always looking for any cheap, interesting, knackered "project" guns. Thanks, JB.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Melton Mowbray
    Posts
    2,042
    With the lighter pellets, the power is too close to 12 for comfort. So instead of lopping off the spring I could increase piston weight or open the TP slightly.
    But which is it?
    According to the information I read my rifle is a little bouncy.
    Repariere nicht, was nicht kaputtist.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Retford, Notts
    Posts
    35,124
    Quote Originally Posted by Neil54 View Post
    With the lighter pellets, the power is too close to 12 for comfort. So instead of lopping off the spring I could increase piston weight or open the TP slightly.
    But which is it?
    According to the information I read my rifle is a little bouncy.
    Mmm, depending on other factors also, Neil, increasing piston weight or opening the TP might cause it to produce even more power.. Unless the TP is already at its upper size limit, in which case creating that bit more lost volume might help drop the power.

    I'd be tempted to source a different, softer spring, or to shorten the existing one a little (although the latter approach will make the spring stiffer). Either way will also result in easier cocking. If you already have minimal preload, I'd definitely go longer / softer spring, as too little preload will likely result in increased piston bounce.
    THE BOINGER BASH AT QUIGLEY HOLLOW. MAKING GREAT MEMORIES SINCE 15th JUNE, 2013.
    NEXT EVENT :- May 4/5, 2024.........BOING!!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Near Wimbledon, SW London, or Lusaka, Zambia
    Posts
    26,451
    Quote Originally Posted by Neil54 View Post
    With the lighter pellets, the power is too close to 12 for comfort. So instead of lopping off the spring I could increase piston weight or open the TP slightly.
    But which is it?
    According to the information I read my rifle is a little bouncy.
    Notwithstanding my caveats earlier in this thread, yes. Opening out the port or increasing the piston weight will both tend to move the rifle towards favouring heavier pellets from it's current bias for light. So, BTW, will fitting a longer, softer mainspring, which is what I'd actually be more tempted to do.

    In order to decide, what are the current specs - bore and stroke, calibre, TP dia and length, piston weight, spring rate ideally but wire guage and dia if not, and amount of preload for each please.
    Always looking for any cheap, interesting, knackered "project" guns. Thanks, JB.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •