Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 58

Thread: I don't believe a TP smaller than 3.0mm ever works in a 12FP springer....

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Near Wimbledon, SW London, or Lusaka, Zambia
    Posts
    26,403

    I don't believe a TP smaller than 3.0mm ever works in a 12FP springer....

    I just don't think it can flow properly and make the power... irrespective of length etc, I've never found anything less that 3.0mm to be efficient, and generally unless the port is exceptionally long (like an LGV), 3.2 is a more usual minimum starting point.

    Even 25mm cylinder guns with fairly heavy pistons found 3.0mm too tight, and had to open out to 3.2. And larger bores 26/28/30 3.2 is always too small.

    Discuss.
    Always looking for any cheap, interesting, knackered "project" guns. Thanks, JB.

  2. #2
    look no hands's Avatar
    look no hands is offline Even better looking than a HW35
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Coventry, even closer to Tony L.
    Posts
    12,049
    Interesting stuff, I love the way you share your many years of research and tinkering skills with us

    Pete
    Far too many rifles to list now, all mainly British but the odd pesky foreigner has snuck in

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    481
    I've always imagined that for sub 12 ft/lb there must be a maths formula you could use to determine the perfect diameter and length of port if you know how much pressure the compression tube is creating, is this flow rate calculator of any use ?

    https://www.copely.com/tools/flow-rate-calculator/

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Worcester
    Posts
    22,210
    Quote Originally Posted by Gunfun View Post
    I've always imagined that for sub 12 ft/lb there must be a maths formula you could use to determine the perfect diameter and length of port if you know how much pressure the compression tube is creating, is this flow rate calculator of any use ?

    https://www.copely.com/tools/flow-rate-calculator/
    I have three formulae for transfer port diameter, and they never agree with each other

    There's too many unknowns to make such calculations reliable.

    The flow rate calculator in the link is for fluids, not air.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    481
    Quote Originally Posted by BTDT View Post
    I have three formulae for transfer port diameter, and they never agree with each other

    There's too many unknowns to make such calculations reliable.

    The flow rate calculator in the link is for fluids, not air.
    I thought in physics fluids were considered liquid, gas (air) or plasma.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluid

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Retford, Notts
    Posts
    34,968
    Quote Originally Posted by look no hands View Post
    Interesting stuff, I love the way you share your many years of research and tinkering skills with us

    Pete
    Yes, Pete, I also think it's brilliant that we have so many people like Jon who will put the work in, experiment etc. and then share their findings with all and sundry. Like he says, anything tighter than 3mm probably creates too much choking effect on most layouts, but I only base that comment on what I've learned from these many great people who are willing to share their knowledge.
    THE BOINGER BASH AT QUIGLEY HOLLOW. MAKING GREAT MEMORIES SINCE 15th JUNE, 2013.
    NEXT EVENT :- May 4/5, 2024.........BOING!!

  7. #7
    look no hands's Avatar
    look no hands is offline Even better looking than a HW35
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Coventry, even closer to Tony L.
    Posts
    12,049
    Quote Originally Posted by TonyL View Post
    Yes, Pete, I also think it's brilliant that we have so many people like Jon who will put the work in, experiment etc. and then share their findings with all and sundry. Like he says, anything tighter than 3mm probably creates too much choking effect on most layouts, but I only base that comment on what I've learned from these many great people who are willing to share their knowledge.
    Indeed Tone, I've been looking at long drills now starting at 3mm and working up in increments, may have to purchase some and have a play one day, I suppose finding out what size TP my Mercs and Supersport have already would help.

    Pete
    Far too many rifles to list now, all mainly British but the odd pesky foreigner has snuck in

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Near Wimbledon, SW London, or Lusaka, Zambia
    Posts
    26,403
    Quote Originally Posted by look no hands View Post
    Indeed Tone, I've been looking at long drills now starting at 3mm and working up in increments, may have to purchase some and have a play one day, I suppose finding out what size TP my Mercs and Supersport have already would help.

    Pete
    a taper reamer makes things a bit easier.. just go from both sides
    Always looking for any cheap, interesting, knackered "project" guns. Thanks, JB.

  9. #9
    look no hands's Avatar
    look no hands is offline Even better looking than a HW35
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Coventry, even closer to Tony L.
    Posts
    12,049
    Quote Originally Posted by Shed tuner View Post
    a taper reamer makes things a bit easier.. just go from both sides
    How do you us one inside the cylinder?

    Pete
    Far too many rifles to list now, all mainly British but the odd pesky foreigner has snuck in

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Portsmouth
    Posts
    1,709
    I go 3.5 mainly due to the fact that’s the size drill bit I’ve usually got lying about 🤣🤣
    "But we have our own dream and our own task. We are with Europe, but not of it. We are linked, but not comprised. We are interested and associated, but not absorbed."
    Winston Churchill 1930

  11. #11
    Barryg's Avatar
    Barryg is offline Registered ̶D̶i̶a̶n̶a̶ User
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Nr. YEOVIL
    Posts
    5,049
    Quote Originally Posted by Shed tuner View Post
    I just don't think it can flow properly and make the power... irrespective of length etc, I've never found anything less that 3.0mm to be efficient, and generally unless the port is exceptionally long (like an LGV), 3.2 is a more usual minimum starting point.

    Even 25mm cylinder guns with fairly heavy pistons found 3.0mm too tight, and had to open out to 3.2. And larger bores 26/28/30 3.2 is always too small.

    Discuss.
    What is the factory 80 size?

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Maylandsea Chelmsford Essex
    Posts
    3,577
    Quote Originally Posted by Barryg View Post
    What is the factory 80 size?
    I think the 80 has a 2.8mm TP standard from the factory, two of mine do.
    Les..

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Maylandsea Chelmsford Essex
    Posts
    3,577
    Out of interest what size TP as the AA Pro/elite got ?.
    Les..

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    cambridge
    Posts
    908
    This has the makings of an interesting thread. I'd like to try & get an understanding of how the variables interact with one another.

    Noticed a comment "The flow rate calculator in the link is for fluids, not air."earlier on in the discussion but isn't air classed as a fluid? I think all gasses are regarded a fluids. They are complex in some respects as they are compressible fluids as opposed to liquid fluids which are generally regarded as incompressible.

    Looking forward to learning a bit about flow rates & fluid dynamics....

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Worcester
    Posts
    22,210
    Quote Originally Posted by trajectory View Post
    This has the makings of an interesting thread. I'd like to try & get an understanding of how the variables interact with one another.

    Noticed a comment "The flow rate calculator in the link is for fluids, not air."earlier on in the discussion but isn't air classed as a fluid? I think all gasses are regarded a fluids. They are complex in some respects as they are compressible fluids as opposed to liquid fluids which are generally regarded as incompressible.

    Looking forward to learning a bit about flow rates & fluid dynamics....
    Gasses are indeed regarded as fluids but, being compressible, will behave very differently in a transfer port.

    The flow rate link would be spot on if we filled our springer cylinders with water, though.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •