Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 58

Thread: I don't believe a TP smaller than 3.0mm ever works in a 12FP springer....

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    6,266
    It is possible to create a model to calculate flow rates. You need to go to modelling all the components, the forces between them and the air itself in the barrel and cylinder. This isn't easy but I did it about 10 years ago. There is no simple formula you can use.

    If the transfer port gets too small, the flow between the cylinder and barrel chokes as the air can't go supersonic (based upon its properties in the cylinder). This is a bad thing as the flow levels off and the pressure in the cylinder goes up a lot. The higher pressure air in the cylinder pushes on the front face a lot harder and makes the forward recoil push horrible.

    The pressure difference between the barrel and cylinder causes the choking. Smaller diameter ports have more resistance so make the pressure difference higher, which leads to choking. So do longer or rougher transfer ports.

    BB

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Retford, Notts
    Posts
    34,956
    Quote Originally Posted by BTDT View Post
    I have three formulae for transfer port diameter, and they never agree with each other

    There's too many unknowns to make such calculations reliable.
    Quote Originally Posted by cooper_dan View Post
    My bachelor's and master's dissertation were based around fluid dynamics, simulation and modelling. One on IC cylinder head flow and one on external aerodynamics. Can be very interesting, but when it comes to transfer ports I would just stick with physical testing. Too many variables and life is too short
    Yes, this.
    THE BOINGER BASH AT QUIGLEY HOLLOW. MAKING GREAT MEMORIES SINCE 15th JUNE, 2013.
    NEXT EVENT :- May 4/5, 2024.........BOING!!

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Retford, Notts
    Posts
    34,956
    Quote Originally Posted by cringe View Post
    I was thinking about making a brass insert as a transfer port, my idea is to make it tapered down from compression tube, with a convex entry, so no sharp corners, highly polished [mirror]. My theory is based on - as a youth I used to polish cylinder head ports on my motor bikes & it did improve performance - better intake/exhaust flow. just an idea at the moment?
    There has been a number of findings from experiments conducted shared with us over the years and, if I remember correctly, the short answer usually boils down to no fancy shapes / bell mouths etc required. Just a nice, parallel, smooth port with no sharp, jagged edges. I think one of the links that T20 posted onto the thread about HW80 transfer port size to the Pyramydairblog shows a few experiments with differing layouts and I'm sure I've seen plenty of others in the past. That old thread is now on page 1, by the way.. Jim has provided some brilliant information over the years on the subject in Airgun World.

    As has been said up above, all very interesting and intriguing stuff.
    THE BOINGER BASH AT QUIGLEY HOLLOW. MAKING GREAT MEMORIES SINCE 15th JUNE, 2013.
    NEXT EVENT :- May 4/5, 2024.........BOING!!

  4. #19
    look no hands's Avatar
    look no hands is online now Even better looking than a HW35
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Coventry, even closer to Tony L.
    Posts
    12,048
    Quote Originally Posted by TonyL View Post
    Yes, Pete, I also think it's brilliant that we have so many people like Jon who will put the work in, experiment etc. and then share their findings with all and sundry. Like he says, anything tighter than 3mm probably creates too much choking effect on most layouts, but I only base that comment on what I've learned from these many great people who are willing to share their knowledge.
    Indeed Tone, I've been looking at long drills now starting at 3mm and working up in increments, may have to purchase some and have a play one day, I suppose finding out what size TP my Mercs and Supersport have already would help.

    Pete
    Far too many rifles to list now, all mainly British but the odd pesky foreigner has snuck in

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    blackburn
    Posts
    277
    Quote Originally Posted by TonyL View Post
    There has been a number of findings from experiments conducted shared with us over the years and, if I remember correctly, the short answer usually boils down to no fancy shapes / bell mouths etc required. Just a nice, parallel, smooth port with no sharp, jagged edges. I think one of the links that T20 posted onto the thread about HW80 transfer port size to the Pyramydairblog shows a few experiments with differing layouts and I'm sure I've seen plenty of others in the past. That old thread is now on page 1, by the way.. Jim has provided some brilliant information over the years on the subject in Airgun World.

    As has been said up above, all very interesting and intriguing stuff.
    OK, thank's for that. so it's back to the drawing board for me!

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Near Wimbledon, SW London, or Lusaka, Zambia
    Posts
    26,399
    Quote Originally Posted by les allam View Post
    Out of interest what size TP as the AA Pro/elite got ?.
    Les..
    3.0 x 15mm, and it's too small, even when the bore is reduced down to 25mm. TOok that one out to 3.2, but the accelerometer data indicates it shoudl be opened up a little more.

    I'll be doing some experiments with my FAC one next year - I don't have all the tools and equipment with me on this trip - or even a shrono. Will also bring a machined lighter piston. However I have no doubt that 3.0 will be too small for a 30mm tube... 3.4 woudl be my guess..
    Always looking for any cheap, interesting, knackered "project" guns. Thanks, JB.

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Near Wimbledon, SW London, or Lusaka, Zambia
    Posts
    26,399
    Quote Originally Posted by look no hands View Post
    Indeed Tone, I've been looking at long drills now starting at 3mm and working up in increments, may have to purchase some and have a play one day, I suppose finding out what size TP my Mercs and Supersport have already would help.

    Pete
    a taper reamer makes things a bit easier.. just go from both sides
    Always looking for any cheap, interesting, knackered "project" guns. Thanks, JB.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Maylandsea Chelmsford Essex
    Posts
    3,577
    Quote Originally Posted by Shed tuner View Post
    3.0 x 15mm, and it's too small, even when the bore is reduced down to 25mm. TOok that one out to 3.2, but the accelerometer data indicates it shoudl be opened up a little more.

    I'll be doing some experiments with my FAC one next year - I don't have all the tools and equipment with me on this trip - or even a shrono. Will also bring a machined lighter piston. However I have no doubt that 3.0 will be too small for a 30mm tube... 3.4 woudl be my guess..
    Thanks for the reply.
    Like you,I have a reduced cylinder PE with standard TP, I am happy with the way my one performs.
    What would I gain from opening up the TP on my gun ?, reduced recoil?.
    Les..

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Near Wimbledon, SW London, or Lusaka, Zambia
    Posts
    26,399
    Quote Originally Posted by les allam View Post
    Thanks for the reply.
    Like you,I have a reduced cylinder PE with standard TP, I am happy with the way my one performs.
    What would I gain from opening up the TP on my gun ?, reduced recoil?.
    Les..
    reduced piston bounce, which then allows for less spring, and therefore less recoil (yes, there's more to it, but basically...).
    Always looking for any cheap, interesting, knackered "project" guns. Thanks, JB.

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Maylandsea Chelmsford Essex
    Posts
    3,577
    Quote Originally Posted by Shed tuner View Post
    reduced piston bounce, which then allows for less spring, and therefore less recoil (yes, there's more to it, but basically...).
    Ok,cheers for the info.
    Les..

  11. #26
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Quigley Hollow, Nuneaton
    Posts
    17,111
    The first British built Magnum springer of the 1970s, the Webley Vulcan, had a 2.5mm transfer port.

    I've used 2.5mm ports on a number of guns without problems.

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Portsmouth
    Posts
    1,709
    I go 3.5 mainly due to the fact that’s the size drill bit I’ve usually got lying about 🤣🤣
    "But we have our own dream and our own task. We are with Europe, but not of it. We are linked, but not comprised. We are interested and associated, but not absorbed."
    Winston Churchill 1930

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Dorset
    Posts
    2,871
    Quote Originally Posted by BTDT View Post
    Gasses are indeed regarded as fluids but, being compressible, will behave very differently in a transfer port.

    The flow rate link would be spot on if we filled our springer cylinders with water, though.
    A springer filled with water, I wonder what the range would be
    Hw77+7

  14. #29
    look no hands's Avatar
    look no hands is online now Even better looking than a HW35
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Coventry, even closer to Tony L.
    Posts
    12,048
    Quote Originally Posted by Shed tuner View Post
    a taper reamer makes things a bit easier.. just go from both sides
    How do you us one inside the cylinder?

    Pete
    Far too many rifles to list now, all mainly British but the odd pesky foreigner has snuck in

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Cambridge UK
    Posts
    7,070
    Quote Originally Posted by HW55T View Post
    A springer filled with water, I wonder what the range would be
    Crikey, can't resist this. When I was knee high to Ronnie Corbett I had an air rifle ... well maybe I should say 'we had' because my friend and I both used it. No idea where it came from or what it was, maybe a Wobbly Jaguar or a Diana 15/16? I remember firing nails, cocktail sticks and potato bits and ..... don't know how, but using it as a water pistol. It wasn't very good. I can't remember how we loaded it. Maybe trickled water in as we cocked it? We did suss that it needed oiling after a few shots though...
    Oh the things you do in the innocence of (very) youth.
    Cheers, Phil

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •