Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 19 of 19

Thread: FWB Mod 65 Pistol - LM

  1. #16
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    311

    FWB 65 barrel weight

    I have one of these pistols. Bought new 1976/77 ish.
    At that time the barrel sleeve/weight was available as an optional extra. I bought one and fitted it.
    It was necessary of course to remove the foresight block by drifting out the large pin and as I recall it was tight!!
    The instructions were to use an adhesive to bond the sleeve in place!
    Ok if there is no intention to remove it. Mine is still in place and will remain so.
    At this stage given the age of the pistols and no longer the pistol of choice for serious competition my advice would be to
    leave it alone and in situ.
    The flat is indeed to facilitate the fitting of the recoil plate.
    The idea was to use it to lock the sledge system in place to give a degree of recoil in order to use the pistol as a trainer for
    centre fire pistols. to tbis end it is possible to change the trigger weight by rotating the device in front of the trigger. set at 500 grams
    for 10 metre air pistol and rotating gave a 1360 gram weight. The minimum allowed then for centre fire pistol competition, under the then international rules.
    As an aside to anyone wanting to remove a barrel weight. I would see it as something to do because it can be, but a bit of a challenge maybe?
    Bit like the "Do not remove" on the rear of Webley pistols in a way. Tell someone they can't do something and there's those that will see it as a challenge rather than
    an instruction....but that is another story!!

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Knoxville Tennessee USA
    Posts
    392
    Quote Originally Posted by Garvin View Post
    Good thinking Mike. That might be it, to make room for the recoil attachment plate.

    Here is one of the sleeves cut down for the FWB65 'shortie':

    As an aside...I lust for this pistol, LOL! the short barrel, sport grips, early short-tang frame and narrower rear sight, and barrel sleeve are to my mind just about the perfect model 65...

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Location
    Aberystwyth
    Posts
    157
    I fancied trying one without the sleeve to see how different the balance is. However if it’s glued on and not straightforward to remove I might just have to get a second one instead...

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Bruton
    Posts
    6,594
    Odd, isn’t it?

    Like Mike, I think short spurs look better and that sport grips are cool.

    If I’d have been a 10M pistol shooter in the 70s or 80s, I’d have thought exactly the opposite.

    Anyway, I only have an 80. Must resist the 65 bug. (Though they are a much more handsome pistol.)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •