Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Questions on HW30S for Gunsmiths

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Aberdeen
    Posts
    653

    Questions on HW30S for Gunsmiths

    I have an HW30S. It is the most enjoyable gun to shoot that I own. I’ve been shooting paper targets, 6-10m standing unsupported with it recently. Yesterday I thought I’d try the HW110 and the Mk4is - they are so heavy compared to the HW30S that I was shite. That got me thinking - would a bullpup, with the weight further back be any better? The more interesting thought though, can I lighten the HW30S, while not moving the centre of gravity forward? The obvious (in my mind) is to cut 3” or so off the barrel, has anyone done this? If no one’s done it, what is the opinion of the gunsmiths on the forum? Or maybe add some weight to the butt (not weight saving, but moving the CoG)? Would either of these changes reduce muzzle stability though?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Ulrome Driffield
    Posts
    1,727
    Not so much a cure for your situation but I find that the K version of the HW30s shoots better, (for me), when unsupported than the standard length version does.

    I think that the weight loss on the shorter barrel is made up by the the muzzle weight but the c of g is moved back somewhat, and the muzzle weight helps with any flip.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Nuneaton, Warwickshire
    Posts
    6,792
    If you are talking mainly about free standing unsupported target shooting then you are thinking the wrong way. It is all down to mass and inertia. The heavier the rifle the more input from you it has to have to move, therefore it is steadier than a light rifle which a slight gust of wind or your own bodies natural movement will alter the point of aim.


    Neil
    Current airguns:- Steyr LG110: Steyr LP10: Air Arms HFT500: Weihrauch97 fully customised.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    wigan
    Posts
    123
    I agree with zephyr. I have tried both versions and bought the k. Found the shorter barrel much better balanced for off hand shooting.
    Air Arms HFT 500. HW100 FSB. HW99 (.22) HW99 (.177) HW30 (.177) HW97K (.177) Gamo GX40 (.22)

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Location
    Aberdeen
    Posts
    80
    Hi Zephyr.

    As you know, I've been tweaking my HW30S for a while now and have come to the conclusion that it needs weight adding to it to both dampen recoil and keep it on target more steadily. I talked with a knowledgeable chap on another forum about this and it's relatively easy to add weight at the rear by drilling down into the stock from the butt pad end and packing lots of used pellets inside but the opinion was that this upset the balance of the gun.

    There's not a lot of meat up front on the stock to allow for compensation in a similar style so, short of machining up barrel weights or a heavy shroud, there's not a lot of neat solutions. The chap I spoke to got round this by using lead stick-on car wheel balancing weights stuck to the stock - not aesthetically pleasing but simple, cheap, practical and effective.

    Like most things, it's all about striking the right balance (sorry.) The beauty of the '30S is it's light weight which means you can plink for ages with it but once you really concentrate on standing 10m groups with it, the absence of weight starts to count against it in my opinion.

    Of course, if Weihrauch would take a gamble and make a heavier, more target orientated stock then that would make life much easier. I think there'd be a demand for a simple, inexpensive 10m starter rifle like the target variants of the old HW55 but based on the HW30S action.

    Go on, HW - grow a pair and test the waters with a limited run of such a gun. I bet they'd fly off the shelves.
    PS Just make sure they don't gall first.
    Ignoring is bliss.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Andover
    Posts
    404
    Are you asking for a answer from a self taught unqualified supposed gun smith or a fully qualified and trained gun smith ?.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •