Results 1 to 15 of 17

Thread: thoughts on HW95k NEW MODEL against OLD MODEL

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Northop Hall Flintshire North Wales
    Posts
    1,421

    thoughts on HW95k NEW MODEL against OLD MODEL

    Having not purchased any air rifles for a good few years and moved onto clays and rimfire/center fire due to the closures of ranges and clay shooting grounds I found the urge to buy a three month old HW95k.The HW95 was my first weihrauch followed by every model they made bar for the 57,My thoughts on the new model being slightly lighter but something is missing or is it me.I still have a 97k and a HW80k both heavier rifles And both having been fitted with when they were available V Mach tuning kits which I found the best.What thoughts have other members have on this rifle bearing in mind it will take me a bit to get used to a springer all over again.
    HW 97k s/s laminated stock.Hw 98k cs500 stock,CZ 457 varmint.Tika T3x Super Varmint 223 rem. an HW95k having sneaked back in Browning 725 12g sporter, pair of 525 sporters,SX3 Red Performance

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Location
    Cary, NC, USA
    Posts
    318

    Hw95l

    I put an ARH kit & piston seal in my 9 month old HW95L .22 after the FPS had dropped. I had about 2K/3K shots through the rifle before the tune. This is a pic of the Weihrauch seal that was burned and damaged.


    This is the shot sound after the kit install.
    https://youtu.be/zhb_S0BVevs

    This is the crono data after the tune.
    Created: 05/11/21 10:53 AM
    Description:
    Notes 1:
    Notes 2:
    Distance to Chrono(FT): 4.00
    Ballistic Coefficient: 0.021
    Bullet Weight(gr): 14.66
    Temp: 60 °F Partly cloudy
    BP: 1020.46 inHg
    Altitude: 495.00
    # FPS FT-LBS PF
    10 707 16.27 10.36
    9 709 16.37 10.39
    8 709 16.37 10.39
    7 712 16.50 10.44
    6 707 16.27 10.36
    5 708 16.32 10.38
    4 710 16.41 10.41
    3 712 16.50 10.44
    2 710 16.41 10.41
    1 718 16.78 10.53
    Average: 710.2 FPS
    SD: 3.3 FPS
    Min: 707 FPS
    Max: 718 FPS
    Spread: 11 FPS
    Shot/sec: 0.0
    True MV: 721 FPS
    Group Size (in): 0.00

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Retford, Notts
    Posts
    34,969
    I do have a newer version of the 95 but haven't used it extensively as yet. I have one of the very earliest versions in .177 which I love to bits and which is one of my most favourite rifles. I cannot imagine any reason why the later ones should be any less enjoyable or effective. I find them accurate and easy to use and would say to go right ahead. After a period of usage and getting to know the rifle inside-out, be led by your experiences and wants as to which tuning route (if any) to take. Take the time to get to know how this excellent springer wants to be handled and you will be rewarded by reliable and enjoyable long service.
    THE BOINGER BASH AT QUIGLEY HOLLOW. MAKING GREAT MEMORIES SINCE 15th JUNE, 2013.
    NEXT EVENT :- May 4/5, 2024.........BOING!!

  4. #4
    tinbum's Avatar
    tinbum is online now Killer Vampire Lesbians on scooters
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Daarn Saaarf!
    Posts
    19,462
    I have an early Mk1 full length in .22 and it's fabulous! I prefer the longer barrel and muzzle weight, but the modern screwcut ones have plenty of benefits too.

    It's the second from bottom here:

    [IMG][/IMG]

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Location
    Winsford
    Posts
    673
    Quote Originally Posted by tinbum View Post
    I have an early Mk1 full length in .22 and it's fabulous! I prefer the longer barrel and muzzle weight, but the modern screwcut ones have plenty of benefits too.

    It's the second from bottom here:

    [IMG][/IMG]
    Nice collection

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Northop Hall Flintshire North Wales
    Posts
    1,421
    Quote Originally Posted by Desmond.22 View Post
    Nice collection
    its a pleaure to see a fine collection,hope they get used, Having not had a chance till now to crono the hw95 found it more than a little low at 9.65ft/lbs with superdomes which is a little disappointing but first chance will strip and see what we can do to raise it a little.Have a mk2 HW 80k and that's only running 10.90ft/lbs but is as sweet as a nut.You do not need to be running 11.99ft/lbs with every rifle its to easy to creep up un noticed
    Last edited by davymole; 15-05-2021 at 10:38 PM.
    HW 97k s/s laminated stock.Hw 98k cs500 stock,CZ 457 varmint.Tika T3x Super Varmint 223 rem. an HW95k having sneaked back in Browning 725 12g sporter, pair of 525 sporters,SX3 Red Performance

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Near Wimbledon, SW London, or Lusaka, Zambia
    Posts
    26,406
    Quote Originally Posted by Desmond.22 View Post
    Nice collection
    Nice rifles, but that's not a collection
    Always looking for any cheap, interesting, knackered "project" guns. Thanks, JB.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •