I don't believe these were fitted with a sight where your diopter is fitted. Mine doesn't have one. I reckon I paid around 300 for it, but it was a while ago.
Manufactured 1954.
Dave
IMG_20210618_154259.jpg
IMG_20210618_154309.jpg
World pork pie juggling champion three years straight
I don't believe these were fitted with a sight where your diopter is fitted. Mine doesn't have one. I reckon I paid around 300 for it, but it was a while ago.
Manufactured 1954.
Dave
IMG_20210618_154259.jpg
IMG_20210618_154309.jpg
Smell my cheese
professional hookaduck ringer
No, just to be clear, I put the diopter on because the rear sight blade is missing, so no, it is not original, and yes, these were made by anschulz in the 50s for the EgyptiansOriginally Posted by Unframed Dave
Morally flawed
Registered User
I paid £400 for an honest one a couple of years ago. Using that, Holts' price and maybe a search on this site should give you a rough idea of value.
The missing rearsight blade and faux charger guide will reduce value slightly but this is still a nice rifle that ought to sell if priced appropriately.
Kind regards,
John
Currently looking for Baikal Makarov pistols with the following prefixes to the serial number: 98, T01, T09, T21, T22
Prefer boxed or cased but will consider loose examples too.
Dodgy Diana User
The sticky up thing isn’t a fake charger guide. It’s a fake spent case deflector.
Not a lot of people know that.
Registered User
Yes that's absolutely right - my bad!
John
Currently looking for Baikal Makarov pistols with the following prefixes to the serial number: 98, T01, T09, T21, T22
Prefer boxed or cased but will consider loose examples too.
The collector formerly known as micky
l sold mine for £360 in 2016 if that helps.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote