Results 1 to 15 of 28

Thread: Recoiless vs recoiling FWB experiment

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    City of London
    Posts
    9,774
    I think the fact the two rifles were comparably accurate says more about your shooting rather than the guns themselves, in that you are conditioned to ignoring recoil. It could be interesting if you showed the different firing characteristics in slow motion, perhaps?
    Vintage Airguns Gallery
    ..Above link posted with permission from Gareth W-B
    In British slang an anorak is a person who has a very strong interest in niche subjects.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Bruton
    Posts
    6,594
    Wondering if anyone has an archive of contemporary match scores from the 60s, which might demonstrate any edge the 150 had over the 110, or early recoilless rifles in general over the recoiling kind?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,573
    Quote Originally Posted by Garvin View Post
    I think the fact the two rifles were comparably accurate says more about your shooting rather than the guns themselves, in that you are conditioned to ignoring recoil.
    You might be right… maybe I’ll do a string of shots using good springer technique, and another string of shots gripping the rifles more tightly.
    It may be that the recoiless FWB’s gave new shooters more accurate results.

    Cheers,
    Matt

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Bruton
    Posts
    6,594
    Quote Originally Posted by ptdunk View Post
    You might be right… maybe I’ll do a string of shots using good springer technique, and another string of shots gripping the rifles more tightly.
    It may be that the recoiless FWB’s gave new shooters more accurate results.

    Cheers,
    Matt
    I think their real success was in being more forgiving of minor user errors by the better shooters over the course of a match.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Near Wimbledon, SW London, or Lusaka, Zambia
    Posts
    26,467
    you need to intruduce hold sensitivity. Bench rested using perfect technique, I'd not expect much if any difference.

    Remember this thread ?

    http://www.airgunbbs.com/showthread....tivity-testing
    Always looking for any cheap, interesting, knackered "project" guns. Thanks, JB.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,573
    Quote Originally Posted by Shed tuner View Post
    you need to intruduce hold sensitivity. Bench rested using perfect technique, I'd not expect much if any difference.

    Remember this thread ?

    http://www.airgunbbs.com/showthread....tivity-testing
    Ah, I didn’t see this.
    As you said shame you didn’t have a standard TX to compare.
    Good thread.

    Cheers,
    Matt

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Retford, Notts
    Posts
    35,216
    Nothing to add other than to agree with the above points. Many recoiling rifles will be just as accurate as their recoilless counterparts per se. It's the hold sensitivity that might separate the two. And even that may be pretty minimal in this experiment taking into account the narrow bore / light internals vs high all-up rifle weight.
    THE BOINGER BASH AT QUIGLEY HOLLOW. MAKING GREAT MEMORIES SINCE 15th JUNE, 2013.
    NEXT EVENT :- August 3/4, 2024.........BOING!!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,573
    Quote Originally Posted by TonyL View Post
    Many recoiling rifles will be just as accurate as their recoilless counterparts per se..
    Are there any other examples of a factory recoiling version of any of the match rifles? I only know of the fwb 120/150, the Diana 70/72 junior rifles and the full power TXSR.


    Cheers,
    Matt

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •