Quote Originally Posted by 45flint View Post
John will probably correct me if I’m wrong but I have read John’s book on the double sear model way too many times since I got this. Lol I think at the time of the double sear they realized 22 was more efficient thus no double sear 25s? And caliber determined length?
Spot on Steve. That's certainly my understanding.

Interesting point though. I wonder if BSA would have accommodated an order for a .25 if a customer was insistent.

And yes, as far as I know, the 43 inch were all .177 and 45 were .22 Stevegv8.

Kind regards,

John