Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 51

Thread: Check out this unusual Westley Richards

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Wooster
    Posts
    3,530
    Look pretty crusty so at least the time period? They look factory made but who knows who put them on? But we have a factory brochure saying they would put custom sights on. I think the easy answer may be the right one? Would someone really go to all the trouble to make these?






  2. #17
    ccdjg is online now Airgun Alchemist, Collector and Scribe
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    2,057
    I have made a quick comparison of the grip plates against those of the first and second version pistols, and you can see below that the checkering on the mystery pistol grips is coarser than on the second version and the WR logo is slightly different to that on the first version, but even so they are professionally done and IMO almost certainly original to the pistol.

    Given the very low serial number of the mystery pistol, this suggests (to me) that both the front sight and the grip plates are original, and the gun may have been an experimental pre-issue model. I can understand why the front sight was never commercialised, but not why the checkered vulcanite grip plates were downgraded to smooth horn, if only for a short period. Unless it was just a cost issue.

    This is a good example of a pistol that should have been left as found and not subjected to excessive restoration.



  3. #18
    micky2 is offline The collector formerly known as micky
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    boston
    Posts
    2,156
    Quote Originally Posted by 45flint View Post
    Look pretty crusty so at least the time period? They look factory made but who knows who put them on? But we have a factory brochure saying they would put custom sights on. I think the easy answer may be the right one? Would someone really go to all the trouble to make these?





    Hi Steve, now having seen the photos of the front sight, l have to agree with you that the pitting fits in with the rest of the pistol, l wonder if W.R ever fitted that front sight to any of their other guns. which would be nice to confirm.

  4. #19
    micky2 is offline The collector formerly known as micky
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    boston
    Posts
    2,156
    Quote Originally Posted by ccdjg View Post
    I have made a quick comparison of the grip plates against those of the first and second version pistols, and you can see below that the checkering on the mystery pistol grips is coarser than on the second version and the WR logo is slightly different to that on the first version, but even so they are professionally done and IMO almost certainly original to the pistol.

    Given the very low serial number of the mystery pistol, this suggests (to me) that both the front sight and the grip plates are original, and the gun may have been an experimental pre-issue model. I can understand why the front sight was never commercialised, but not why the checkered vulcanite grip plates were downgraded to smooth horn, if only for a short period. Unless it was just a cost issue.

    This is a good example of a pistol that should have been left as found and not subjected to excessive restoration.


    Hi John, l have to agree with you on the above comments, and for me as well it should have been left as found.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Wooster
    Posts
    3,530
    Quote Originally Posted by ccdjg View Post
    I have made a quick comparison of the grip plates against those of the first and second version pistols, and you can see below that the checkering on the mystery pistol grips is coarser than on the second version and the WR logo is slightly different to that on the first version, but even so they are professionally done and IMO almost certainly original to the pistol.

    Given the very low serial number of the mystery pistol, this suggests (to me) that both the front sight and the grip plates are original, and the gun may have been an experimental pre-issue model. I can understand why the front sight was never commercialised, but not why the checkered vulcanite grip plates were downgraded to smooth horn, if only for a short period. Unless it was just a cost issue.

    This is a good example of a pistol that should have been left as found and not subjected to excessive restoration.


    For the record I have the pistol and the grips are vulcanite.

  6. #21
    ccdjg is online now Airgun Alchemist, Collector and Scribe
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    2,057
    Quote Originally Posted by 45flint View Post
    For the record I have the pistol and the grips are vulcanite.
    Very interesting. This writes a new bit of history to the Highest Possible, which is not bad considering the guns have been around for more than 100 years.

    What really puzzles me is that the information turned up in the USA!

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Wooster
    Posts
    3,530
    These grips are also much thicker than the later ones and actually give a much better grip of the pistol. I wonder if they are more in line with the profile of the horn grips? There is a positive of the breakup of the Beeman collection, the guns are out in the public eye again? Shame a airgun museum was never created but heirs tend to like the money.




    Last edited by 45flint; 25-10-2023 at 03:19 PM.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    City of London
    Posts
    9,756
    They look better than the later grips. I've always felt they weren't thick enough for a decent hold.
    Vintage Airguns Gallery
    ..Above link posted with permission from Gareth W-B
    In British slang an anorak is a person who has a very strong interest in niche subjects.

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Wooster
    Posts
    3,530

    Never over till it’s over

    Was working on leather seal of serial #5 and look what was starring up at me. It’s serial #45 which may change the narrative? The serial number on the main frame was badly rusted and only a very faint 5 was visible which the auctioneer used. Serial #45 would make sense that this may have been the first prototype of a new vulcanite grip and they decided to go with something less elaborate for the later pistols. May make the front sight a little more perplexing? But maybe this sight like the grips was the first attempt to change the original sight but they decided to go with the curved adjustable rear sight?

    Last edited by 45flint; 27-10-2023 at 01:59 AM.

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Wooster
    Posts
    3,530
    For those that like to look inside I took apart the pistol and found the person reworking this pistol fashioned a modern piston seal. Looks like everything else is original. Old flat wound spring. Cleaned out all the dried up grease and relubed it. Works much better now but leather breech seal needs to be replace. Even after that I expect not great velocity, but it will be a good pistol to demo operation. After looking at the pistol I am sure this was at one time a rusty mess? The refinishing job was superb, though certainly at the price of lettering and crisp edges. I would rather have it like this without question even though that goes against my grain.





    Last edited by 45flint; 27-10-2023 at 10:47 PM.

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,568
    Quote Originally Posted by 45flint View Post
    Cleaned out all the dried up grease and relubed it.
    Did you reblue it?

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Wooster
    Posts
    3,530
    Quote Originally Posted by ptdunk View Post
    Did you reblue it?
    ?? In the quote I relubed the piston and spring? I bought it reblued, professionally done by someone who knew what they were doing. I would assume Beeman had it done, I think many older collectors tended to not have as many issues about refinishing? I know Ingvar Alm refinished.
    Last edited by 45flint; 27-10-2023 at 10:53 PM.

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,568
    Quote Originally Posted by 45flint View Post
    ?? In the quote I relubed the piston and spring? I bought it reblued, professionally done by someone who knew what they were doing. I would assume Beeman had it done, I think many older collectors tended to not have as many issues about refinishing? I know Ingvar Alm refinished.
    Ok, wasn’t clear from your post.
    Awesome variation on the H.P, glad it was acquired by a forum member.,

    Cheers,
    Matt

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Wooster
    Posts
    3,530
    New breech seal, shooting some air out the barrel now. Doubt the fps will set any records but it’s working. Just put a hole in paper with quite a pop! Never thought it would shoot when I got it.

    Last edited by 45flint; 28-10-2023 at 01:27 AM.

  15. #30
    micky2 is offline The collector formerly known as micky
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    boston
    Posts
    2,156
    Yes it is great to get a old airgun working again.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •