Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 32

Thread: Springer HFT - Break Barrel or Underlever?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Hsing-ee's Avatar
    Hsing-ee is offline may also be employed in conjunction with a drawn reciprocation dingle arm, to reduce sinusoidal repleneration
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    18,254

    Springer HFT - Break Barrel or Underlever?

    There is a springer shoot soon at the club.

    Does one

    1. take a nice heavy underlever to get the steady aim and subdued recoil, but pay the penalty in manoueverability and also stamina on the difficult standing shots?

    2. take a lighter but more jumpy break-barrel to give the edge on standing shots and anything that needs a bit of twisted posture?

    Ideally one would have built up one's strength with hundreds of hours of underlever practice but one has not.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2020
    Location
    Eastwood
    Posts
    1,524
    If the proportion of standing shots were to be greater than 50% I would say the break barrel but if mostly rested then the underlever.
    The more I think I know, the more I realise the less I know.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Worcester
    Posts
    22,211
    LGV.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Dunstable
    Posts
    10,417

    Thumbs up

    HW80 running a 25mm reduced piston will work wonders
    them there springer's are soooooo addictive

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Grantham
    Posts
    1,354
    Quote Originally Posted by joffy View Post
    HW80 running a 25mm reduced piston will work wonders
    I'm having the same thoughts, been invited to have a go at hft, but carrying a few injuries, so think i'll try my Paul Short reduced cylinder 80, that should do the job nicely

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Runcorn right by the bridge
    Posts
    7,569
    Quote Originally Posted by BTDT View Post
    LGV.
    is the answer

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Retford, Notts
    Posts
    35,211
    Mmmmmmm.......that'd be a toughie. Although certainly not an expert in this field, a few years ago I was fortunate enough to visit Lincs HFT Club a couple of times. On one occasion I took a 77. Another time one of the 95s. Very tough choice.....

    I think it'd be between the 77/97 and a 99 (the 99 tuned down a tad more to get it even sweeter shooting and more able to take advantage of its lighter weight and compact demeanour). I'd even once toyed with the idea of the super-sweetie little 30. But, if keeping the power lower to maintain that unbelievable cycle, it may suffer much more in windy conditions.
    THE BOINGER BASH AT QUIGLEY HOLLOW. MAKING GREAT MEMORIES SINCE 15th JUNE, 2013.
    NEXT EVENT :- August 3/4, 2024.........BOING!!

  8. #8
    Hsing-ee's Avatar
    Hsing-ee is offline may also be employed in conjunction with a drawn reciprocation dingle arm, to reduce sinusoidal repleneration
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    18,254
    Quote Originally Posted by TonyL View Post
    Mmmmmmm.......that'd be a toughie. Although certainly not an expert in this field, a few years ago I was fortunate enough to visit Lincs HFT Club a couple of times. On one occasion I took a 77. Another time one of the 95s. Very tough choice.....

    I think it'd be between the 77/97 and a 99 (the 99 tuned down a tad more to get it even sweeter shooting and more able to take advantage of its lighter weight and compact demeanour). I'd even once toyed with the idea of the super-sweetie little 30. But, if keeping the power lower to maintain that unbelievable cycle, it may suffer much more in windy conditions.
    thats basically the choice ... you think the same as me as I was thinking to take the 30 but it runs out of puff after 30 yards..

    A heavy break barrel is kind of the worst of both worlds to me. I've a HW35 Export I need to build up so I could prove myself wrong at some point.

    I'm going to take my long-stroke old school HW50 with the long barrel. Might put it in a HW99 stock to get the rubber recoil pad.

    Thanks gentlemen.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Retford, Notts
    Posts
    35,211
    Quote Originally Posted by BTDT View Post
    LGV.
    Quote Originally Posted by mallyally View Post
    is the answer
    Very, very possibly.
    THE BOINGER BASH AT QUIGLEY HOLLOW. MAKING GREAT MEMORIES SINCE 15th JUNE, 2013.
    NEXT EVENT :- August 3/4, 2024.........BOING!!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Pendlebury, Greater Manchester
    Posts
    2,640
    I can't imagine the benefits of using a light goods vehicle on the course....

    IGMC
    The Mayor: Intent? How did you establish that?
    Harry Callahan: When a man is chasing a woman through an alley with a butcher’s knife and a hard-on, I figure he isn’t out collecting for the Red Cross.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Wakefield, West Yorks
    Posts
    1,412
    Quote Originally Posted by BTDT View Post
    LGV.
    LGV for me too. They have an excellent shooting cycle and are as accurate as the fixed barrel guns.

  12. #12
    Barryg's Avatar
    Barryg is offline Registered ̶D̶i̶a̶n̶a̶ User
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Nr. YEOVIL
    Posts
    5,070
    Quote Originally Posted by S Hebby View Post
    LGV for me too. They have an excellent shooting cycle and are as accurate as the fixed barrel guns.
    The question in the OP seemed to me to be asking if the lighter break barrel would be better for standing shots, if so then the 9.3 lbs LGV would be worse than the TX at 9 lbs, also the TX is not obsolete and a far better trigger. I suppose if you want to try and win or compete at HFT you can't beat the proven TX

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Chelmsford
    Posts
    2,077
    Walking a course the lighter the better for me as Im old and beat up, Ive actually been having a few hours practicing with sticks and both my 400 Cometa’s, benched both are about the same accuracy but Im finding the shorter barrelled USC proving better off sticks for some reason.
    Im now looking at a .177 barrel for the 220compact
    bigtoe, Harry, hydroclamp, jpsnorton, gayle89, mark410, Stu83, smallholder1, wellhouse0, readingcop, sir-slots-alot, danco1987, Stevenb, DarylDiane, simpleSimon, Ratinator, Milek, Josh, Maxtich, Woodsie99, Ozzie, master_shriller, niloc, Drake267, deejayuu, shootingstars

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Bishops Stortford
    Posts
    103
    Quote Originally Posted by Dornfelderliebe View Post
    If the proportion of standing shots were to be greater than 50% I would say the break barrel but if mostly rested then the underlever.
    Nothing to consider. For HFT thiere is only 1 unsupported standing shot!!
    .22 Winner 2014 World HFT Championships (S400)
    Recoiling Winner 2017 World HFT Campionships (HW97k)
    HFT England team 2018, 2019, 2020 (Rhino enhanced HFT500)

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2020
    Location
    Eastwood
    Posts
    1,524
    Quote Originally Posted by Wheelieneilie View Post
    Nothing to consider. For HFT thiere is only 1 unsupported standing shot!!
    That would be me done for then.
    My main shooting excuse is the statins give me the shakes and as for prone, kneeling or sitting on a cushion both knees are so knackered nowadays that I cannot get down.
    The more I think I know, the more I realise the less I know.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •