My shooting partner who has a s10 now and again has a little dig at my rapid mk11,he says that for value for money you can't beat the s10 and that theobens are overpriced,and how do they justify the differ ie rapid 795 and s10 500 pounds,both reged only differ is the rapid has a walnut stock, so if you want one on the s10 extra 80 pounds,I said the quality of the rapid is abit better and a nicer looking gun but he's not having that,I 'am not knocking he's gun they both preform well in .22,now I dont the mechanical side to this long going debate so I'am asking any of you members out there your opinions on the two rifles please so that when he see's the reply maybe that might shut him up,I like theoben guns and all my rifles are theobens but I never say mines better then your ,you know things like that,but he gets he's nickers in a twist and I just let him get on with it,so any reasons as to why? thank you.