Quote Originally Posted by Terry D View Post
Not a lecture about firearms law, delivered by the GTA to the HO, then? Surely, given the complexity of this issue, the HO would need detailed explanation of the 'various categories of firearm' in order to decide 'how the law pertains to each'? This is just my take on it.

You claimed I either made something up, or I know more than I'm saying. Neither is true.
You said,

...ALL attendees were discussing how the law is applied to the examples involved.
The HO state that the meeting was "a demonstration" and "a lecture" by the GTA. They declined to give names of attendees under the FOI regulations on the basis that it was not a discussion.

Please think before you make untrue allegations about me in future.
It doesn't require much thought to see that the HO version is different from yours. You seem to be making rather a lot of assumptions based on a very flaky press release, that's all.