mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm lets c this one
In post 99, Gary C said I was contemplating shooting rabbits at 100yds. If he had read the last sentence of the first paragraph of post 95 he would have known that this was not the case.
I dont shoot live quarry any more at any range, and would never attempt to shoot anything but paper and tagets at long range.
I don't need preaching to by anyone, I just want to enjoy my shooting and do it to the best of my ability.
ATB. Neil.
Last edited by sniper-wolf; 23-08-2007 at 12:02 PM.
Sorry Kenny, Don't think i can make Sunday. If i can i will come along. I dont have a gun, sold up my hft rig so gunless, so will have to watch. All the best.
Regards
George
Should be attending JG on Sunday....looking forward to giving it a go in the wee windless valley.
Anybody putting up £20 if it gets done there?
As far your challenge, 94 yards from sitted at the bench and my lucky bunny as support.....and no wind may take ya up on that
Had a wee blast again yesterday up at Kypeside, will let Zico post his thoughts on it.
http://pccures.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/pics/windy.jpg
http://pccures.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/pics/range1.jpg
http://pccures.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/pics/range2.jpg
http://pccures.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/pics/target.jpg
In post 99, Gary C said I was contemplating shooting rabbits at 100yds. If he had read the last sentence of the first paragraph of post 95 he would have known th this was not the case.
he has a way of making things suit his arguement
Richard, there is one thing that you don't seem to have taken into account and that's the different stabilisation methods of pellets versus bullets.
Pellets are by and large (boat-tailed bullet type designs) have drag stabilisation as a large component of the total stabilisation (as the Cardews showed). Spin does come into it or we'd all be shooting smooth bores but drag stabilisation is very important. Needless to say I'd expect that to be a significant factor in the differences between a bullet and a diablo shaped pellet.
The effect of the different shapes on the wind's effects has got to be a factor too.
I don't think you can compare pellets to bullets. Especially when the bullets are being shoved along at 4000 fps!
A major problem with airgun accuracy at long range is the trajectory. If a pellet travels 20" above line of sight then canting the rifle 90degrees will result in a 40+" windage error. OK, nobody is going to accidentaly cant the rifle by 90degrees but you can see the point. If an HMR had 1" drop over the same distance the maximum error would be 2". Take those figures down to a realistic 2-3degrees and you can see that the HMR will be in one hole, the airgun much larger.
A large cross type target gives you something to align your crosshairs on, for consistency, and is the best type to use.
Note: this simplistic explanation does not take scope height into consideration.