View Poll Results: Pro-Sport Stutzen

Voters
61. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes, I'd be interested.

    45 73.77%
  • No, stupid idea.

    16 26.23%
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 32

Thread: Pro-Sport Stutzen?

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Clent/Prague/St Dogmaels
    Posts
    6,581

    Damn...

    ...Snooper beat me to it Well within GNIB's capabilities Not sure why you'd need an extended cocking link? BSA Stutzen doesn't?

    C'mon AirArmsDavid, where are you when we need you?

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Wet Cold Downtown Leicester
    Posts
    18,523
    I'd have some of that if they replaced the underlever with proper blued steel at the same time
    A man can always use more alcohol, tobacco and firearms.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Clent/Prague/St Dogmaels
    Posts
    6,581

    Now...

    ...that would be an added bonus

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Runcorn right by the bridge
    Posts
    7,571

    Wink stutter

    what about a sidelever now that would be eligant "and sack the girly checkering"

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Leicester
    Posts
    12,379
    Quote Originally Posted by Born Again View Post
    at least someone saw it was a joke

    personally i reckon the tx mk3 would be a better stutzen as the underlever arrangement is better than the PS and the underlever would drop enough to get a grip on.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Troisdorf / Germany / Europe
    Posts
    301
    Jup, the aluminum-under-lever is the big downside of the ProSport, aside the lack in availability in Germany and if you ever have cocked an Anschütz-Hakim ( an airgun made for the Egyptian army by Anschütz in the late 50s ) you know the differences between what is and what could be.

    Jochen
    Indeed she said tie me up and do what ever you like and so I did. I tied her to the bed and went out fishing

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Wet Cold Downtown Leicester
    Posts
    18,523
    Quote Originally Posted by ikarma70 View Post
    at least someone saw it was a joke

    personally i reckon the tx mk3 would be a better stutzen as the underlever arrangement is better than the PS and the underlever would drop enough to get a grip on.
    Your not quite getting this are you
    A man can always use more alcohol, tobacco and firearms.

  8. #23
    AirArmsDavid Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by sbd View Post
    ...Snooper beat me to it Well within GNIB's capabilities Not sure why you'd need an extended cocking link? BSA Stutzen doesn't?

    C'mon AirArmsDavid, where are you when we need you?
    Chris only just directed me to this thread after I mentioned I'd ordered a BSA Superstar Carbine Stutzen stock from GINB today.

    They happened to have a Superstar (and of course a Pro Sport mould for you lot) and Jamie liked the Diana 46 Stutzen so why not?

    Will have add-on/removeable non-adjustable hampster for HFT practicality, adjustable cheekpiece and butt pad, and be based on either the Diana or Antonio's own prototype (the 'dream rifle') as below.

    Which do YOU prefer. Maybe a crossbreed???

    Attached Images Attached Images

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    near rotterdam,netherlands
    Posts
    3,538
    I like the looks of stutzens, but it'll make the PS (even) more frontheavy I'm afraid.
    ATB,
    yana

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Sunderland
    Posts
    858
    Quote Originally Posted by Snooper601 View Post
    Ask Antonio at GinB, he could easily do the mods to one of his stocks and then it only needs a longer cocking arm to be made.

    Cheers

    John
    Thats a good idea,Im sure GinB would be able to do it.Certainly would get some interest, a Pro-Sport Stutzen

  11. #26
    Sam Vimes is offline Vanquished a Weihrauch evangelist with a gasram
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Richmond, North Yorkshire.
    Posts
    9,529
    Quote Originally Posted by hwtyger View Post
    I like the looks of stutzens, but it'll make the PS (even) more frontheavy I'm afraid.
    You aren't the first to say this but if the stock maker does his stuff well it shouldn't be a problem. If he doesn't the imaginative use of a drill and lead can easily change the balance of a rifle.
    Fabricatum diem, pvnc!

  12. #27
    AirArmsDavid Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by sam vimes View Post
    You aren't the first to say this but if the stock maker does his stuff well it shouldn't be a problem. If he doesn't the imaginative use of a drill and lead can easily change the balance of a rifle.
    My PS is in one of these at the moment: http://www.picturetrail.com/gallery/...81&uid=7499492

    If you take the big lump of wood from underneath and stick a smaller lump on the front end I'd say it'd still balance.


  13. #28
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Romford Essex
    Posts
    2,830
    Never been a fan of the Stutzen,i always thought they look like they should be sent back to the 1940's.A Prosport version? "Your avin a larf aincha"!

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    tunbridge wells kent
    Posts
    1,119

    Smile pro sport stutzen

    Yeah instead of sliding breech why dont they fit an inefficient tap and sticky 2stage trigger and call it the pro airsporter

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Liskeard, Cornwall
    Posts
    14,313
    I don't like Stutzens, purely personal, but what's the point? Why try and make a beautiful rifle look like an old Lee Enfield..?

    Gus
    The ox is slow, but the earth is patient.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •