Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 27

Thread: Sightron SIII 10x44 MMD - First blush review...

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Horley
    Posts
    2,297

    Sightron SIII 10x44 MMD - First blush review...

    I received my new Sightron SIII 10x44 MMD this morning and thought i'd post a "first blush" review.

    Any product experience begins with purchasing, this is especially true with high-end items, and the experience with AIM fieldsports was as good as one could hope; the lady who aswered the phone was polite and helpful and John is clearly a subject matter expert who listened to my questions and answered them well.

    The scope arrive really well packaged, with a cap, a sunshield and the usual cleaning/storing cloths.

    I'm going to compare this scope to my current favorite, the Lightstream 4.5-14x44, which is a fan-bloody-tastic scope in it's own right!

    The finish is a bit different, the Lightstream has a semi-gloss finish whilst the Sightron has what appears to be a much thicker matt finish. The Lightstream finish looks like it might be a dip/paint whereas the Sightron appears anodized - I use these terms to describe their appearance not how the actual finish is applied.

    The overall heft and finish on both scopes is first class and I for one would find it difficult to discern which is "better" - they are different in their approaches but each is executed really well. I would say that the clicks of the turret adjustments are more precise and solid on the Sightron.

    Setting the Lightstream to 10x I compared the performance of the glass between the two. It should come as no real surprise that a top quality fixed power has better performance than a vari-power scope but lets talk some specifics.

    To MY EYES (note the shouty text... ) the Sightron provides not only a brighter image but also truer color seperation and presentation that makes details easier to see. It's field of view seemed to be a bit narrower to me but the image crisper edge-to-edge.

    It's PX adjustment is to the rear of the scope and is very nicely executed, in fact I think I prefer it to AO and not having Side focus means the scope's a tad less clunky. It works really well and is smooth and reassuring, also pretty darn close to dead-on too.

    The Lightstream, being a FFP mil-dot vari, does have a reticule that looks more substantial at 10x than the Sightron and it doesn't have 1/2 mil marks either. That said it does have the distinct advantage of being a vari-power with a broad range of mags that make it more generally useful for close range to long range applications. A fixed 10x is probaby not a best choice for ratting in a barn

    I bought the Sightron to go on the SFS Spectre that I have being built, the 1/2 mil will be useful given it's a .22 and I fancied a quality fixed power...well....just because really!

    On balance it's tough to pick between the two, the Sightron is definitely the better scope at a fixed power but the Lightstream has the benefit of more utility. Pays your money, takes you choice

    (and I might end up putting the Lightstream on the Spectre and the Sightron on my .177 Airwolf to complete the "tactical look")

    I hope this is of some use to those considering nice glass for their pride and joys. I will say that, also owning MTC-priced scopes that you do get what you pay for with glass but, much like true high-end HiFi, there are price/value brackets (<100, 150-250, 500, 1G) and that moving from the first to the second provides a bigger performance jump than from the 3rd to the 4th but it has ever been so, that last 10% costs 10x as much

    Russ.
    I think and therefore...... I refuse to steal someone else's quote to try to sound more erudite or profound than I actually am.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    BOLTON
    Posts
    60
    Nice review Russ. I think FFP is the way to go in .22. The Spectre is deadly accurate, but a little hold sensitive. The half mil dot really comes in useful as you start to stretch the range out to what the rifle is capable of. I'd be interested to see how you get on. PM if you prefer

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Dalkeith
    Posts
    322
    Good review, Fella.

    I've also got a Lightstream, which is markedly better than anything else I've ever looked through – so I'll have to check out the Sightron, now.

    rangetime.tumblr.com

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Formby
    Posts
    3,278
    Bottom line for me is that I get far less parallax error using the Sightron. Both great scopes, but the Sightron edges it for me.

    Andy
    Member, the Feinwerkbau Sport appreciation Society (over 50's chapter)
    http://www.rivington-riflemen.eu/ Andy, from the North !

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Doncaster
    Posts
    2,379
    I have found very little PX error at all, and the clarity is superb. If you could lock the turrets it would be the perfect scope.
    I think I will be looking for another soon for a second HFT/SFT back up rig.
    The other thing that I really like is that it is very easy to get good head alignment with very quickly, which gives confidence, especially prone when you don't always contact the cheek piece.
    Dean.
    BASC

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Antwerp Belgium
    Posts
    330
    I bought one this weekend , allready set up on my Steyr LG110
    allways used MTC or Hawke scopes for HFT , in my everlasting quest for the holy scope I decided to try better glass for a change , I'm not saying MTC or Hawke is bad , they are great value for the money
    more expensive as the above but image is much clearer , the half mildot ret is very usefull
    depth of view is ok , 15-35 meters clear , longer and shorter is blurry , I hope this will improve my poor rangefinding ...
    have to get used at 10x allways shot at 7x or 8x with 25 mm tube
    head alignment is indeed easy , eye relief seems to be a bit longer than on other scopes I have used
    haven't noticed px error , moving the head it gives clear image only on one place
    it looks well built , is compact and not heavy at all
    I also would like a way to lock the turrets , they click very easy
    the afternoon I tried it it looks good but I realise the scope won't take away my errors ...

    Peter
    Last edited by Petervw; 13-08-2013 at 04:23 AM.

  7. #7
    Tommo's Avatar
    Tommo is offline You're never alone with a .308.
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Castletown, Isle of Man
    Posts
    6,430
    Nice review.. I have the SIIISS 6-24x50 LRMOA which I use to great effect from 50 to 1000m. As said it gives a great clear, crisp image with excellent colour rendition. Turrets are firm but extremely positive with great feel to them. The quality of the build is evident right out of the box. I am delighted with mine.

    It has to be said that purchasing anything with nearly a £1000's worth of value to it is not to be taken lightly but, as said, John goes out of his way to accommodate all Q&A a prospective buyer might have. And it's not just down to 'high end' value scopes. I have an AIM drag bag and buttstock pouch costing way less than the Sightron but the service was just as good when I bought them.

    Well done Sightron, well done AIM FEILDSPORTS, well done John.
    .308 HS Precision HTR Custom Rem 700 .308 Parker-Hale Scout + P8 mod .243 Ruger M77 + P8 mod, Ruger 10/22, .22 CZ, 12g Hatsan Escort, 12g Lincoln No2, 12g Mossberg 500 12g Laurona sxs, Caesar Guerini Magnus 12g NRA RCO

  8. #8
    leadpig is offline sheet lead welder extraordinaire
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    isle of man
    Posts
    5,404
    +1 i have the 6-24x50lrmd fantastic scope

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    great yarmouth
    Posts
    43
    I have a 10x44, nothing I would want too change it for .

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Antwerp Belgium
    Posts
    330
    first shoot with the 10x42 yesterday
    it was a clear day and it did the job, consistent in clear/blurry and the combination of rangefinding by eye and checking with the scope worked fine
    it didn't help on the standers though

    Peter

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    5,072
    Quote Originally Posted by Petervw View Post
    first shoot with the 10x42 yesterday
    it was a clear day and it did the job, consistent in clear/blurry and the combination of rangefinding by eye and checking with the scope worked fine
    it didn't help on the standers though

    Peter
    What does, Peter, what does?


  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Horley
    Posts
    2,297
    I can confirm that this scope is a great option for a .22 springer, mine being the SFS Specter - the 1/2 mill reticule and a range finder really help with a loopy .22 and I've got it nicely mapped from a zero of 25 yards, 30, 35, 40, 43, 46 and 50 yards.

    Great clarity and a good weight/size.

    Only ask I could possible have is perhaps an illuminated reticule option would be nice for dark-woods scenarios.
    I think and therefore...... I refuse to steal someone else's quote to try to sound more erudite or profound than I actually am.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Formby
    Posts
    3,278
    Is it just me, or has anybody else resorted to taping up their scope turrets? Very easy to move them if removing/replacing the gun into a carrier during competition I am afraid. Apart from that, the Sightron remains the best scope I have used to date, and is, to my eyes, the best I have used with the ability to blur the image with minimal parallax alterations, allowing reasonably accurate HFT ranging. Mine is set at 21yards.

    Andy
    Member, the Feinwerkbau Sport appreciation Society (over 50's chapter)
    http://www.rivington-riflemen.eu/ Andy, from the North !

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Doncaster
    Posts
    2,379
    Quote Originally Posted by Amac View Post
    Is it just me, or has anybody else resorted to taping up their scope turrets? Very easy to move them if removing/replacing the gun into a carrier during competition I am afraid. Apart from that, the Sightron remains the best scope I have used to date, and is, to my eyes, the best I have used with the ability to blur the image with minimal parallax alterations, allowing reasonably accurate HFT ranging. Mine is set at 21yards.

    Andy
    I have not taped mine but I do zero the turrets to keep an eye on them. I have turned mine a couple of times putting it in an out of the bag. Fantastic scope apart from this, and I have owned and used most scopes out there for HFT. I started counting the number of scopes that I had owned for hunting and HFT over the years, and I stopped a over 40. These are quality though.
    Dean.
    BASC

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Formby
    Posts
    3,278
    Now moved my parallax setting out to just over 28 yards as getting the odd miss at 40 plus with it set at 20.
    Member, the Feinwerkbau Sport appreciation Society (over 50's chapter)
    http://www.rivington-riflemen.eu/ Andy, from the North !

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •