With that last post of yours, you demonstrate why you are unqualified to comment (this is not just my opinion, I understand).
If you don't know your subject - leave it to those who do. (
)
Your first line / sentence is clearly rubbish.
Your second 'statement' regarding scope mounting rails ("wrong spacing") is also incorrect:
Like most airgun makers FX have used the 11mm 'dovetail' standard (perhaps with better regard to the actual '11mm'
width than some others have shown).
Responding to numerous demands from their biggest single market, the USA, asking for
weaver mount rails (
dovetails, yes but slotted and on steroids!) they went ahead and produced a set of weaver slotted rails. (all this powered by the marvellous power of the WWW).
...
Some of the 'voices' calling for "weaver mounts" actually meant
Picatinny Mounts (more properly known as 'MIL-STD-1913 rail', or Standardization Agreement 2324 rail which is a scope mounting system largely used by the US Military - a so-called system of placing different scopes/sights/etc onto weapons as required by the situation - this is an ENTIRELY MYTHICAL solution to a perceived problem (but from a military standpoint).
Here's why...
Basically, Picatinny MS 1913 does not acheive ANY accuracy gains whatsoever (quite the opposite). The military have entirely different ambitions when 'shooting' to a
responsible civilian hunter, for instance.
Both 'weaver' and Picatinny rails are 22mm wide, UGLY AS HELL, and have no
real reason to be on an airgun ... IMO.
Your comments tell
me that you are just trolling this thread.