Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 16

Thread: Original 24 and smaller Diana's.

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    Glenrothes
    Posts
    1,356

    Original 24 and smaller Diana's.

    I managed to pick up a 24 after a period of many years and it is just as good as I remembered. A wee delight.
    The smaller Diana's 24/26 seem very thin in the ground these days and seem to be unacclaimed. Why isn't there HW30 style love for the wee Diana's?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Bruton
    Posts
    6,616
    I like them a lot.

    I have a 24 (Webley Air Wolf), a later 26 or 28 (can't remember which and it's locked away), 25, 25D, and a 27S. The ones with the ball-sear trigger (from that list the 26/8, 25D and 27) are better - the simpler triggers on the 24 and 25 are average by youth gun standards.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    Glenrothes
    Posts
    1,356
    That's a great collection. I do agree that the 24 trigger is a bit unrefined and imagine the ball sear would suit these guns down to the ground.
    I wonder why they do not get the recognition some other small Germans get?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Pontypridd South Wales uk
    Posts
    1,850
    Quote Originally Posted by Drew451 View Post
    That's a great collection. I do agree that the 24 trigger is a bit unrefined and imagine the ball sear would suit these guns down to the ground.
    I wonder why they do not get the recognition some other small Germans get?
    I think there's a degree of herd following in regards to guns Drew. Everything right with buying guns based on the good experiences of others. But on other hand it does mean that other equally good guns a little off the beaten track are overlooked and missed.
    The concept of shooting a nice quality low power springer at close range targets is actually growing on me.
    Dave

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    Glenrothes
    Posts
    1,356
    Quote Originally Posted by jonnyone View Post
    I think there's a degree of herd following in regards to guns Drew. Everything right with buying guns based on the good experiences of others. But on other hand it does mean that other equally good guns a little off the beaten track are overlooked and missed.
    The concept of shooting a nice quality low power springer at close range targets is actually growing on me.
    Dave
    I think that makes perfect sense, Dave. I like to do the opposite from the herd as long as it doesn't mean I have to shoot crap. I think Diana's maybe just fell out of fashion, even before prices went silly.
    You won't regret getting a smaller Diana. There is a nice thread over on General Airgun extolling the virtues of wee springers.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Retford, Notts
    Posts
    37,287
    Yep, bought a mint little 24D (with the T01 trigger) three or four years ago for the bargain price of just £69.

    Lovely. The trigger, once adjusted to my taste, is lovely. Very, very easy cocking effort, the thing barely moves on firing, it's very accurate and has a lovely, precision, quality feel to it.

    Popularity.....My theory.....Back in 1977, before Airgun World was launched, many airgun users had little knowledge of the German makes. BSAs, Webleys, Relums and Milbro Dianas would have been the main staple diet. Once the magazine came out, we were introduced to wonders such as the HW35, Feinwerkbau Sport, Original 35/S, BSF B55 and the Anschutz 335. Although they all seemed rare and very exotic at the time, the '35 was featured in a very early issue, so maybe earned recognition amongst UK shooters earlier than the others?

    For a long while, I'd guess that the 35 and FWB Sport were more in the limelight and also, seemingly, more widely available?

    Then came the mighty HW80 which really boosted popularity and exposure of the Weihrauchs. The way the 80 easily made the power was a huge attraction, at a time when many rifles' outputs were not perceived as "full power".

    I can't remember if the Original 45 arrived before or after the HW77, but the 77 was a massive game changer and, quite justifiably, gained huge popularity. I guess that HW had very much become the norm by then, and it was hard for other rifles to get a look in.

    This would also have had a knock on effect of lower exposure / popularity of the Original / Diana brand. I seem to remember that marketing of the Originals was not non-existent, so would guess that poorer availability and less recognition were the reasons?
    THE BOINGER BASH AT QUIGLEY HOLLOW. MAKING GREAT MEMORIES SINCE 15th JUNE, 2013.
    NEXT EVENT :- May 17/18, 2025.........BOING!!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    Glenrothes
    Posts
    1,356
    Quote Originally Posted by TonyL View Post
    Yep, bought a mint little 24D (with the T01 trigger) three or four years ago for the bargain price of just £69.

    Lovely. The trigger, once adjusted to my taste, is lovely. Very, very easy cocking effort, the thing barely moves on firing, it's very accurate and has a lovely, precision, quality feel to it.

    Popularity.....My theory.....Back in 1977, before Airgun World was launched, many airgun users had little knowledge of the German makes. BSAs, Webleys, Relums and Milbro Dianas would have been the main staple diet. Once the magazine came out, we were introduced to wonders such as the HW35, Feinwerkbau Sport, Original 35/S, BSF B55 and the Anschutz 335. Although they all seemed rare and very exotic at the time, the '35 was featured in a very early issue, so maybe earned recognition amongst UK shooters earlier than the others?

    For a long while, I'd guess that the 35 and FWB Sport were more in the limelight and also, seemingly, more widely available?

    Then came the mighty HW80 which really boosted popularity and exposure of the Weihrauchs. The way the 80 easily made the power was a huge attraction, at a time when many rifles' outputs were not perceived as "full power".

    I can't remember if the Original 45 arrived before or after the HW77, but the 77 was a massive game changer and, quite justifiably, gained huge popularity. I guess that HW had very much become the norm by then, and it was hard for other rifles to get a look in.

    This would also have had a knock on effect of lower exposure / popularity of the Original / Diana brand. I seem to remember that marketing of the Originals was not non-existent, so would guess that poorer availability and less recognition were the reasons?
    Good post. I'm with you on all of that, Tony but I do think Frank Dyke promoted and distributed Originals pretty well. I'm not sure when Dykes ceased the concession but I do think Leslie Hewitt /RWS/ Ruag didn't do Diana's justice. It was then that marketing and availability suffered. The HW boom definitely was an issue for all the other manufactures too.
    The 45 arrived in 1978, before the 80 and well before the 77. It did well for a spell but faded. They ran til 1988 but personally, I have seen very few dated after about '82/'83.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Pontypridd South Wales uk
    Posts
    1,850
    Quote Originally Posted by Drew451 View Post
    Good post. I'm with you on all of that, Tony but I do think Frank Dyke promoted and distributed Originals pretty well. I'm not sure when Dykes ceased the concession but I do think Leslie Hewitt /RWS/ Ruag didn't do Diana's justice. It was then that marketing and availability suffered. The HW boom definitely was an issue for all the other manufactures too.
    The 45 arrived in 1978, before the 80 and well before the 77. It did well for a spell but faded. They ran til 1988 but personally, I have seen very few dated after about '82/'83.
    I also agree. I think a trawl through some of the dedicated airgun shooting press back in the day would be quite telling both in terms of the marketing profile of Diana and their price point against the competition.

    I'm heartened to see Diana doing well and long may they continue in that way. Of course we now have a new crop of low powered/ junior airguns in the range these days. I wonder how these will be viewed in years to come against their more popular higher profile stablemates?
    Dave

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Bruton
    Posts
    6,616
    Two thoughts:

    1. The 70s-80s were "power mad". I was a teenager then. We all wanted "full hunting legal limit 12 ft/lbs power" even if that meant we ended up at 14 trying to manage an HW80, and probably failing.

    2. The Original Dianas were better marketed than later (or now) but they were typically anything from the same price as a BSA Meteor (24 and Meteor both about £44-45 in 1984) to 5-10% more expensive. Those youth guns were mostly bought by dads - who (a) probably didn't want to spend more than needed to start junior shooting, (b) still had a patriotic attachment to British brands.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    Glenrothes
    Posts
    1,356
    Quote Originally Posted by Geezer View Post
    Two thoughts:

    1. The 70s-80s were "power mad". I was a teenager then. We all wanted "full hunting legal limit 12 ft/lbs power" even if that meant we ended up at 14 trying to manage an HW80, and probably failing.

    2. The Original Dianas were better marketed than later (or now) but they were typically anything from the same price as a BSA Meteor (24 and Meteor both about £44-45 in 1984) to 5-10% more expensive. Those youth guns were mostly bought by dads - who (a) probably didn't want to spend more than needed to start junior shooting, (b) still had a patriotic attachment to British brands.
    Very true. I also remember some of those with junior guns had dads who were into shooting and were gun savvy. These were often bought new. But yes, a lot of 14 year olds were wrestling with 2nd/ 3rd hand HW's, BSA Mercs or big Webleys.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Retford, Notts
    Posts
    37,287
    Quote Originally Posted by Drew451 View Post
    Good post. I'm with you on all of that, Tony but I do think Frank Dyke promoted and distributed Originals pretty well. I'm not sure when Dykes ceased the concession but I do think Leslie Hewitt /RWS/ Ruag didn't do Diana's justice. It was then that marketing and availability suffered. The HW boom definitely was an issue for all the other manufactures too.
    The 45 arrived in 1978, before the 80 and well before the 77. It did well for a spell but faded. They ran til 1988 but personally, I have seen very few dated after about '82/'83.
    Quote Originally Posted by Geezer View Post
    Two thoughts:

    1. The 70s-80s were "power mad". I was a teenager then. We all wanted "full hunting legal limit 12 ft/lbs power" even if that meant we ended up at 14 trying to manage an HW80, and probably failing.

    2. The Original Dianas were better marketed than later (or now) but they were typically anything from the same price as a BSA Meteor (24 and Meteor both about £44-45 in 1984) to 5-10% more expensive. Those youth guns were mostly bought by dads - who (a) probably didn't want to spend more than needed to start junior shooting, (b) still had a patriotic attachment to British brands.
    Thank you for that, Drew.

    And yes, Geezer, fully agree with your observations.

    And I did mean to make those points too, but brain power was fading.
    THE BOINGER BASH AT QUIGLEY HOLLOW. MAKING GREAT MEMORIES SINCE 15th JUNE, 2013.
    NEXT EVENT :- May 17/18, 2025.........BOING!!

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Dudley
    Posts
    1,365

    Diana

    I sold alot of my smaller junior diana air rifles but I did keep one that appealed to me and less seen but never the less a well made model the original model 228 and I love it's size weight and how it shoots.

    Most of the 45 models I still retain in fact had were between 78-83 stamped just a couple date stamped post 83.

    I had Been going through them few months back to reduce somewhat but struggle to let any more go.

    Still love them

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Pontypridd South Wales uk
    Posts
    1,850
    Quote Originally Posted by original45 View Post
    I sold alot of my smaller junior diana air rifles but I did keep one that appealed to me and less seen but never the less a well made model the original model 228 and I love it's size weight and how it shoots.

    Most of the 45 models I still retain in fact had were between 78-83 stamped just a couple date stamped post 83.

    I had Been going through them few months back to reduce somewhat but struggle to let any more go.

    Still love them
    So do I mate. I think it fair to say that anyone who takes an interest in the Diana threads has a soft spot for them. I always have had a focus on hunting power air rifles but these smaller Diana's are certainly catching my eye.
    Without wishing to hijack Drew's fine thread here about the smaller Diana's I want to throw a question into the mix about Diana's in general including the smaller guns :
    Taking account of all the different qualities of the marque and reflecting on the older (Original) Diana's and the modern crop of guns- which do you consider has the better quality feel to them? Old or modern?
    I'll throw my three pence in. I think the older guns have more character and slightly better quality of finish than the modern Diana offerings. I'm not saying modern Diana's are poor. I'm just saying older guns had that little something extra.
    And before I have to retreat to a bunker and take cover I think the same can be said of many other makes. Hw especially!
    Dave

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Bruton
    Posts
    6,616
    Quote Originally Posted by jonnyone View Post
    So do I mate. I think it fair to say that anyone who takes an interest in the Diana threads has a soft spot for them. I always have had a focus on hunting power air rifles but these smaller Diana's are certainly catching my eye.
    Without wishing to hijack Drew's fine thread here about the smaller Diana's I want to throw a question into the mix about Diana's in general including the smaller guns :
    Taking account of all the different qualities of the marque and reflecting on the older (Original) Diana's and the modern crop of guns- which do you consider has the better quality feel to them? Old or modern?
    I'll throw my three pence in. I think the older guns have more character and slightly better quality of finish than the modern Diana offerings. I'm not saying modern Diana's are poor. I'm just saying older guns had that little something extra.
    And before I have to retreat to a bunker and take cover I think the same can be said of many other makes. Hw especially!
    Dave

    Old is nicer. Old may not be better, but is nicer.

    My "little" Diana collection (from memory, I have not done a detailed inventory tonight ) includes:

    LP5 wood,
    LP5 grey plastic,
    LP5G
    LP6G x 2
    LP6M x 2
    LG24 (Webley)
    LG25
    LG25D
    LG26/28
    LG27S
    LG34
    LG35 (1950s)
    LG35 (1970s)
    LG36
    LG45 (.20")
    LG50 (1970s)
    LG52
    LG66

    The Giss guns (6, 66) are awesome bit of kit and I must get a 10 and a 75.

    For build/finish quality and historical charm, the wood grip 5 and the 1950s 35 are streets ahead of the rest. They don't shoot any better - sometimes less well - than the later guns. But if you like early Airsporters, or Webley Seniors or MkIIIs, then they are the Diana equivalent.

    I would love a 1950s 50. Amazing build and finish. Of course, an HW77 has a far better shot cycle and much greater accuracy.

    My oddball nomination for consideration is the 27S, which is uglier than the standard 27, but shoots excellently.

    Which means I need a 25DS and a 35S to compare!

    Sort of back on topic: I happily contend that the 25D and 27 (and the S models of both) are in contention with the obvious HWs as the best 7-9 ft/lbs "youth" springers ever made.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    Glenrothes
    Posts
    1,356
    That's quite a collection, Geezer. There must be few like it, anywhere. I must say that the "LG" / "LP" prefix adds a further touch of class or possibly anorak. I believe that older is better built and was better put out the door, so to speak. I don't think the brand is inferior to Weihrauch but generally speaking they are less deluxe/ hewn from solid if I can put it like that. But there are exceptions.

    Here's my lot: 24, 34, 35, 35S, 45 x 4, RWS45, 50 x 2, 66, 75, 280

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •